The post-purchase phase remains underexplored in neuromarketing because capturing neural and physiological responses related to long-term emotions like satisfaction, loyalty, or regret is difficult in controlled environments.
Interdisciplinary fields such as neurophilosophy, neuroeconomics (Sanfey et al., 2006), neurofinance, and neuromarketing have emerged to address the limitations of traditional research approaches, which often describe what is happening but fail to explain why or how it occurs, as noted by Medina et al. (2021).
Neuromarketing techniques measure variables including affective responses, emotional valence, arousal, cognitive load, and other cognitive processes.
Horst Stipp (2015) documented the evolution of neuromarketing research from a novelty to a mainstream practice, specifically focusing on how neuro research tools improve knowledge about advertising.
Neuromarketing provides a valuable approach for creating more targeted, personalized, and effective marketing strategies in a market characterized by short attention spans and plentiful consumer options.
The systematic review of neuromarketing literature by the authors contributes to empirical research, commercial applications, and theory development by establishing a standardized definition for neuromarketing and addressing its definitional ambiguity.
The neuromarketing literature lacks a systematic analysis comparing the effectiveness of neurometric and non-neurometric tools in measuring psychological variables across different domains, as noted by Harris et al. (2018).
Oliveira P. M. et al. (2022) found that many foundational theories remain relevant and robust when applied to modern neuromarketing tools and techniques.
Mordor Intelligence provides market research and company insights regarding the size, growth, share, and analysis of the neuromarketing industry.
The article 'Neuro-insights: a systematic review of neuromarketing perspectives across consumer buying stages,' authored by Raveena Gupta, A.P. Kapoor, and H.V. Verma, was published in Frontiers in Neuroergonomics, volume 6, on July 11, 2025.
Song et al. (2025) published 'The neuromarketing: bridging neuroscience and marketing for enhanced consumer engagement' in IEEE Access, which discusses the integration of neuroscience and marketing.
Rancati G., Nguyen T. T. T., Fowler D., Mauri M., and Schultz C. D. (2024) applied a multidisciplinary neuromarketing approach to study customer experience in coffee stores, published in the Journal of Consumer Behaviour.
Christophe Morin (2011) published 'Neuromarketing: the new science of consumer behavior' in the journal Society, which frames neuromarketing as a new scientific approach to understanding consumer behavior.
Heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) are used in neuromarketing as indicators of attention and arousal, with heart rate acceleration indicating increased arousal and heart rate deceleration indicating increased attention and interest.
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is unlikely to be used in future consumer neuroscience and neuromarketing research because it requires participants to ingest radioactive substances.
The NeuroTypology 3 × 3 framework integrates insights from neuromarketing and consumer decision-making literature, utilizing these as 'method theories' to offer new perspectives on each stage of the purchase process.
Neuromarketing is defined as an interdisciplinary area which applies neuroscience and cognitive neuroscience to business, focusing on creating brain-friendly content or communication to understand how consumers react at a non-conscious level in real time, based on brain operating principles, with responses measurable by various neuro-metric or non-neuro metric techniques.
Nemorin (2017) published 'Neuromarketing and the “poor in world” consumer: how the animalization of thinking underpins contemporary market research discourses' in Consumption Markets & Culture, which explores how the animalization of thinking influences market research.
Previous neuromarketing literature has identified gaps including the need to clarify the definition of neuromarketing, investigate emerging subfields, and assess the effectiveness of various neuromarketing tools.
The authors of the review introduce a 2 × 3 typology for neuromarketing that combines decision-making processes (conscious vs. unconscious) with three buying stages (pre-purchase, purchase, and post-purchase).
Neuromarketing is defined as the integration of neuroscience into consumer behavior research to provide insights into the neural mechanisms driving consumer actions.
L. Cardoso, M. M. Chen, A. Araújo, G. G. F. de Almeida, F. Dias, and L. Moutinho (2022) assessed the scientific performance of neuromarketing research, identifying research gaps and emerging topics.
Oikonomou et al. (2023) published 'A sparse representation classification scheme for the recognition of affective and cognitive brain processes in neuromarketing' in the journal Sensors, which introduces a classification scheme for identifying brain processes.
Lin, M. H., Jones, W., and Childers, T. L. (2024) utilized neuromarketing as a tool for scale validation to understand individual differences in affective judgments based on the style of processing scale, as published in the Journal of Consumer Behaviour.
Yüksel (2023) investigated the performance of a web-based eye-tracking system under different lighting conditions for the purpose of neuromarketing.
Smidts (2002) published 'Kijken in Het Brein: Over De Mogelijkheden Van Neuromarketing' (Looking into the Brain: On the Possibilities of Neuromarketing) as an ERIM Report Series reference.
Neuromarketing can have positive implications for both society and consumers, an aspect often overlooked in ethical discussions surrounding the field.
Stanton, Sinnott-Armstrong, and Huettel (2017) examined the ethical implications of using neuromarketing, including its potential for misuse, in the Journal of Business Ethics.
Hsu and Chen (2020) utilized EEG (electroencephalography) to study the effects of subliminal advertising on hotel selection in a neuromarketing context.
Marques dos Santos, J. P. and Marques dos Santos, J. D. (2024) conducted an fMRI study on brand perception using explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) in the field of neuromarketing, published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.
Recent neuromarketing research includes studies by Tan and Lee (2024) using fMRI and questionnaires; Ülker et al. (2025) using GSR, PPG, and questionnaires; Xu and Liu (2024) using EEG; Zhang et al. (2024) using fMRI and questionnaires to study consumer wellbeing; Adalarasu et al. (2025) using EEG and questionnaires to study emotional intelligence; Khubchandani and Raman (2025) using eye-tracking (ET) and questionnaires to study SOR Theory; Lopez-Navarro et al. (2025) using EEG, EDA, and questionnaires to study perception; Marques et al. (2025) using EDA and FEA to study the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM); Šola et al. (2025) using eye-tracking (ET) to study the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM); and Yu et al. (2025) using fNIRS to study anthropomorphism and pro-social behavior.
Neuroscience offers tools for studying attention, attitudes, emotions, and memory-based decision-making that can be leveraged in neuromarketing.
Most neuromarketing research has focused on pre-purchase factors such as branding, advertising, and packaging design, while neglecting immediate cognitive and emotional responses at the point of sale.
Lim, W. M. (2018) published 'Demystifying neuromarketing' in the Journal of Business Research, volume 91, pages 205–220.
Neuromarketing studies conducted in controlled laboratory environments often lack ecological validity, which limits the generalizability of the findings to real-life consumer contexts.
The purchase stage of consumer behavior remains underexplored in neuromarketing research compared to earlier stages like information search and evaluation, as stated by Yun et al. (2021).
Neuromarketing research can help product managers, brand managers, retailers, and advertisers gain a more accurate understanding of consumer feelings toward products by linking brain activity and emotional responses to stimuli, rather than relying on potentially biased self-reported data.
Neuromarketing research is limited by a focus on immediate consumer reactions rather than long-term behavioral and emotional outcomes.
Most current neuromarketing studies are conducted in controlled laboratory environments, which may limit their ability to capture real-world consumer behavior.
Neuromarketing has the potential to address social marketing challenges, including excessive drinking, drug use, and climate change.
Many neuromarketing studies oversimplify consumer behavior by focusing primarily on neural or emotional responses while neglecting complex factors such as cultural, social, and cognitive influences.