Amr Hamzawy argues that the only viable path toward stability and security in the Middle East is through fostering dialogue, coordinated initiatives, and joint diplomacy among the region's influential states.
Limited partnerships based on ad hoc alliances among subsets of regional states are a potential alternative to full cooperation in the Middle East.
Major global powers, including the United States and China, appeared resigned to the inevitability of prolonged instability in the Middle East.
Amr Hamzawy proposes that a regional security initiative in the Middle East should prioritize restoring the Palestinian cause as a matter of self-determination and the right to an independent state.
Efforts to establish collective security in the Middle East are hindered by regional actors' continued reliance on military tools, support for armed militias, and interference in the internal affairs of other states.
Israel is increasingly isolated in the Middle East, which highlights the difficulty of achieving regional dominance through militarized policies.
The ongoing conflict in the Middle East has caused human suffering and material destruction, which has drained regional resources and eroded stability, making peace and sustainable development increasingly unattainable.
Türkiye seeks to redefine its regional role by balancing assertive military actions in Syria with diplomatic efforts to foster stability in Palestine and the Middle East.
The Hamas attacks on October 7, 2023, and Israel's subsequent military response recentered the Middle East's conflicts on Palestine and led to an escalation of direct and proxy wars involving Israel, Iran, Türkiye, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Syrian factions.
The author urges key stakeholders in the Middle East—including Israelis, Palestinians, Iran, and Gulf countries—to commit to the cessation of conflicts, the de-escalation of arms races, and the advancement of peace and justice.
The Middle East is currently characterized by a protracted war of attrition, extensive destruction, the repeated collapse of nation-states, and stagnant economic, social, and political development.
Amr Hamzawy serves as a senior fellow and the director of the Carnegie Middle East Program, with research focusing on governance in the Middle East and North Africa, social vulnerability, and the roles of governments and civil societies.
Systemic injustice has been the principal driver of wars, displacement, and chronic instability across the Middle East since 1948.
The Middle East is currently characterized by relentless violence, extensive destruction, the collapse of nation-states, and stagnant economic, social, and political development.
The interplay between Iran and Israel has entrenched the Middle East in a protracted war of attrition, characterized by mutual escalations that perpetuate instability and a cycle of violence.
Between 2011 and 2023, the Islamic Republic of Iran utilized military tools, both directly and through proxies, to secure strategic gains and solidify its role as a power broker in the Middle East by exploiting the instability of the Arab Spring uprisings.
In 2011, widespread uprisings in the Middle East toppled regimes in Tunisia and Egypt, caused civil wars in Libya, Syria, and Yemen, and increased pressure on Jordan and Morocco to implement reforms.
Russia and the European Union are currently focused on salvaging their remaining stakes in the Middle East while grappling with diminishing regional influence.
Prior to the October 2023 Gaza war, the Middle East was experiencing a cycle of wars and armed conflicts that had resisted military and political resolution for decades.
The Middle East's instability is fueled by its status as a battleground for direct and proxy conflicts, specifically Israel's rivalry with Iran and a broader regional arms race.
Naguib Mahfouz, a Nobel laureate and chronicler of Egypt's and the Middle East's twentieth-century history, emphasized that a just and comprehensive peace is the singular path to salvation amid conflict.
The responsibility for ending conflicts and establishing stability in the Middle East rests on major regional actors, specifically Tel Aviv, Tehran, Ankara, Cairo, Riyadh, and Abu Dhabi.
The author argues that the Middle East's stability and security depend on collaborative regional efforts and joint diplomacy among influential Middle Eastern states, rather than relying on external powers like the United States.
Türkiye participated in regional and international conferences to promote a ceasefire in Palestine and Lebanon, advocate for a two-state solution, and mitigate hostilities across the Middle East.
Türkiye scaled back military operations in Iraq and reduced financial and military support for Islamist groups across the Middle East and North Africa, leading to improved relations with Gulf countries, Iraq, and Iran.
Türkiye engaged in regional and international conferences to promote a ceasefire in Palestine and Lebanon, advocate for a two-state solution, and mitigate hostilities across the Middle East.
The proposed regional security grouping for the Middle East would operate under five commitments: (1) Noninterference: Respect for the sovereignty of states and adherence to noninterference in internal affairs; (2) Peaceful Conflict Resolution: Adoption of dialogue, negotiation, and consensus-building to resolve tensions and conflicts; (3) End to Militarism: A commitment to cease direct and proxy military interventions, halt support for armed militias, and refrain from employing force as a policy tool; (4) Support for Self-Determination: Efforts to end occupation, dismantle settlements, and lift blockades to enable peoples seeking self-determination to achieve it within realistic frameworks; (5) Nation-State Building and Consolidation: Initiatives to rebuild and stabilize fragmented or collapsed states across the Middle East and to end the presence of militarized nonstate actors and terrorist militias.
Some ruling elites and civil society groups in the Middle East believe that global powers, specifically the United States, China, Russia, and the European Union, should intervene to stabilize the region.
Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Türkiye have provided humanitarian relief to affected Palestinian and Lebanese populations and coordinated diplomatically to press global powers to intervene in the violence across the Middle East.
Major regional players in the Middle East must shift their roles toward fostering collective security to end conflicts and initiate peaceful settlements.
Amr Hamzawy proposes that a new regional security initiative in the Middle East should prioritize collective security to resolve entrenched conflicts and promote sustainable development.
Türkiye seeks to redefine its regional role by balancing assertive military actions in Syria with diplomatic efforts to foster stability in Palestine and the wider Middle East.
Systemic injustice has been the primary driver of wars, displacement, and chronic instability across the Middle East since 1948.
Israel and Iran are key regional powers whose ambitions are driving the current war and its resulting devastating consequences in the Middle East.
Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition lacks regional partners willing to endorse his “good versus evil” paradigm for the Middle East.
Great powers, including the United States, China, Europe, and Russia, often prioritize strategic interests over humanitarian and developmental considerations in the Middle East, which perpetuates and exacerbates regional instability.
Amr Hamzawy argues that a regional security framework in the Middle East should aim to shape the future of Syria to be free from the dominance of armed groups and external military interventions.
Israel's military-dominated posture remains a defining factor in Middle Eastern regional dynamics.
Between 2015 and 2023, Israel's Middle East policy utilized a dual strategy of aggressive stances by far-right and religious governments toward Palestinians and Iranian allies, combined with calculated openness toward select regional actors.
Amr Hamzawy characterizes the current situation in the Middle East as an apartheid system that targets Palestinian populations in Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem.
The ongoing conflict in the Middle East, driven by the ambitions of Israel and Iran, has resulted in significant human suffering, material destruction, and the erosion of regional stability, hindering prospects for peace and sustainable development.
Israeli actions before 2011 perpetuated regional instability and weakened the ability of Tel Aviv to establish diplomatic and security agreements across the Middle East and North Africa.
The necessity of sustaining military strikes to prevent the 'axis of resistance' from resuming rocket and drone attacks perpetuates instability in the Middle East.
The proposed regional security grouping for the Middle East would operate under five commitments: (1) Noninterference: Respect for the sovereignty of states and adherence to noninterference in internal affairs; (2) Peaceful Conflict Resolution: Adoption of dialogue, negotiation, and consensus-building to resolve tensions and conflicts; (3) End to Militarism: A commitment to cease direct and proxy military interventions, halt support for armed militias, and refrain from employing force as a policy tool; (4) Support for Self-Determination: Efforts to end occupation, dismantle settlements, and lift blockades to enable peoples seeking self-determination to achieve it within realistic frameworks; (5) Nation-State Building and Consolidation: Initiatives to rebuild and stabilize fragmented or collapsed states across the Middle East and to end the presence of militarized nonstate actors and terrorist militias.
The unexpected collapse of the Assad regime in Syria destabilized the region and forced the United Arab Emirates to confront the resurgence of armed militias aligned with political Islam, an ideology the United Arab Emirates considers the greatest security threat to the Middle East.
A regional framework for security in the Middle East should be based on principles of peace, respect for sovereignty, noninterference, the containment of armed militias and violent nonstate actors, and opposition to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
The author argues that Middle Eastern populations, governments, and civil society organizations should assume collective accountability to address regional crises and prioritize regionalizing security, stability, and peace.
The article argues for regionalizing security, stability, and peace in the Middle East by calling on populations, governments, and civil society organizations to assume collective accountability for addressing multifaceted crises.
Global powers including the United States, China, Russia, and the European Union have adopted fragmented and reactive approaches to Middle Eastern conflicts, often prioritizing immediate interests or crisis management over structural resolution.
Israel has emerged as a strategic winner in the current Middle East conflict, having substantially weakened Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, and their allies.
The Middle East is currently characterized by direct and proxy conflicts, including the rivalry between Israel and Iran and a regional arms race, which fuel instability.
A burgeoning youth population in the Middle East, deprived of human security and prospects, is increasingly driven toward radicalism, violence, or illegal migration.
Between 2020 and 2023, the government of Türkiye recalibrated its Middle East policies, taking steps to rebuild diplomatic and economic ties with Arab governments and Iran, and initiated a partial retreat from its unilateral support for armed Islamist groups in Syria.
A regional security framework in the Middle East must be grounded in fair and enforceable principles and include all countries from Iran in the east to Morocco in the west to foster trade, promote good neighborhood practices, and leverage regional resources.
The United States is currently unable or unwilling to lead a collective regional security initiative in the Middle East, which creates an urgent need for regional players to assume this responsibility.
The relationship between Iran and Israel has resulted in a protracted war of attrition in the Middle East, characterized by mutual escalations and instability.
Iran is increasingly vulnerable and isolated in the Middle East due to the erosion of its ideological and political narrative.
There is a growing consensus among regional actors that enduring stability in the Middle East is best achieved through regional-led mediation, negotiation, and cooperation rather than military actions.
The impact of the war in the Middle East remains palpable and the threat of continued violence persists, even after a ceasefire has been signed.
The ideological and political appeal of the narrative previously used by Iran has eroded, leaving Iran increasingly vulnerable and isolated in the Middle East.
In 2011, the Middle Eastern political landscape was characterized by widespread uprisings and the rise of Islamist groups that supported Palestinian resistance factions, including Hamas and Islamic Jihad, and utilized anti-Israeli rhetoric.
The collapse of the Assad regime in Syria destabilized the region and forced the United Arab Emirates to confront the resurgence of armed militias aligned with political Islam, an ideology the UAE considers the greatest security threat to the Middle East.
Before the outbreak of the Gaza war in October 2023, the Middle East was already struggling to endure a cycle of volatile and disruptive conflicts that had defied military and political resolution for decades.
Prior to the 2011 Arab Spring, the Middle East faced instability due to the aftermath of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, the regional war on terror, stalled Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations, the Gaza blockade, settlement activity in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and escalations between Israel and Palestinian factions.
Collective security arrangements among regional powers like Tel Aviv, Tehran, Ankara, Cairo, Riyadh, and Abu Dhabi could serve as a foundation to reduce tensions, mitigate conflicts, and foster long-term stability in the Middle East.
The burgeoning youth population in the Middle East is increasingly vulnerable to radicalism, violence, and illegal migration due to a lack of essential human security and limited future prospects.
The Syrian civil war, which began in 2011, continued without resolution alongside other regional crises in the Middle East.
Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Türkiye, Israel, and Iran possess significant political, military, economic, and diplomatic influence that allows them to impact regional stability in the Middle East.
The Middle East's path toward stability and security depends on collaborative regional efforts, dialogue, coordinated initiatives, and joint diplomacy among influential states rather than reliance on external powers like the United States.
Between 2011 and 2023, Iran solidified its role as a power broker in the Middle East by leveraging the unstable environment created by the Arab Spring uprisings to secure strategic gains through direct military action and proxy groups.
Amr Hamzawy asserts that the Middle East currently maintains an apartheid system that targets Palestinian populations in Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem.
Israel, Iran, Türkiye, and the United Arab Emirates continue to wield military capabilities in ways that perpetuate cycles of violence and delay meaningful collective action in the Middle East.
Amr Hamzawy asserts that the only viable path toward stability and security in the Middle East is through fostering dialogue, coordinated initiatives, and joint diplomacy among the region's influential states.
A proposed regional security framework for the Middle East should include all countries from Iran to Morocco and focus on fostering trade, promoting good neighborhood practices, and leveraging regional resources to enhance security and prosperity.
The Palestinian cause has been increasingly overshadowed by broader turmoil in the Middle East and the shifting dynamics introduced by the Abraham Accords.
Amr Hamzawy proposes that a regional security framework in the Middle East should aim to shape Syria’s future to be free from the dominance of armed groups and external military interventions.
Israel, Iran, Türkiye, and the United Arab Emirates continue to wield military capabilities in ways that perpetuate cycles of violence and delay meaningful collective action in the Middle East.
Amr Hamzawy argues that the first test of a regional security grouping in the Middle East should be to restore the Palestinian cause as a matter of self-determination and the right to an independent state.
Benjamin Netanyahu and his far-right coalition lack the means to bring the conflicts they have perpetuated to a conclusive end, leaving Israel increasingly isolated in the Middle East.
Türkiye's ability to assert influence and shape the emerging Middle Eastern order depends on its ability to harmonize partnerships with regional powers and balance competing interests.
The absence of a balanced power structure and effective international leadership has left the Middle East trapped in a cycle of violence, resulting in humanitarian consequences and implications for global security.
Israel has emerged as a strategic winner in the current Middle East conflict, with Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, and their allies substantially weakened, though the country remains in a precarious position.
The responsibility for ending conflicts and establishing stability in the Middle East rests on the region's major actors, specifically Tel Aviv, Tehran, Ankara, Cairo, Riyadh, and Abu Dhabi.
The United States and China primarily manage crises in the Middle East through piecemeal, temporary measures aimed at safeguarding their immediate interests rather than resolving structural challenges.
The inability or unwillingness of the United States to lead a regional security initiative in the Middle East creates an urgent need for regional players to assume this responsibility.
Efforts to establish collective security in the Middle East are hindered by regional actors' continued reliance on military tools, support for armed militias, and interference in the internal affairs of other states.
Major regional players in the Middle East must shift their roles toward fostering collective security to end conflicts and initiate peaceful settlements.
By the beginning of 2014, Egypt's foreign policy regained momentum, but encountered a Middle East characterized by unprecedented threats and dangers.