Jim Hoagland claimed in his Washington Post column that Saddam Hussein 'respects only force and will respond to nothing else.'
Christopher Hitchens noted in Harper's (January 1991) that the New York Times characterized Iraq as 'pragmatic' and 'cooperative,' attributing these virtues to Saddam Hussein's 'personal strength.'
Forrest Sawyer reported on ABC's Nightline on August 3, 1990, that tens of thousands of Iraqi troops were massed along the Saudi Arabian border and that there was fear Saddam Hussein would carry his blitzkrieg across Saudi territory.
Jim Hoagland claimed that the base of support for Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein was too narrow and shaky to withstand a sharp, telling blow.
James Atkins, a former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia, stated in In These Times (August 29, 1991) that the U.S. deployment was unnecessary because Saddam Hussein was a rational person who would have known that an invasion of Saudi Arabia would trigger a swift U.S. military response due to the Carter Doctrine.
Jim Hoagland criticized CBS for interviewing Jordanians who were sympathetic to Saddam Hussein and opposed U.S. military intervention.
Saddam Hussein stated regarding the Iraqi intervention in Kuwait: "as soon as the situation settles down and the evil grip is loosened on Arab Kuwait."
On August 3, 1990, King Hussein of Jordan visited Saddam Hussein in Baghdad, where the Iraqi President indicated he was prepared to make major compromises, including a potential withdrawal from Kuwait, and stated he had signed a nonaggression pact with Saudi Arabia.
In August 1984, Peter Galbraith, an aide to Senator Claiborne Pell, submitted a staff report warning that Saddam Hussein was operating a neo-Stalinist state, though the Reagan administration ordered the report to be watered down.
The August 7, 1990, edition of the Washington Post aggressively promoted a military solution to the Gulf crisis while demonizing Saddam Hussein.
Presidential press secretary Marlin Fitzwater claimed that during a meeting with U.S. chargé d'affaires Joseph Wilson, Saddam Hussein indicated he had no intention of leaving Kuwait.
A front-page story in the Washington Post concerning a meeting between Saddam Hussein and Joe Wilson, which alleged Iraq's refusal to negotiate or leave Kuwait, was used to legitimate U.S. policy.
Mary McGrory referred to Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein as a 'beast' in her Washington Post column, which the author Douglas Kellner characterizes as a dehumanizing epithet.
Jim Hoagland stated in his Washington Post column that the United States must use military force against Saddam Hussein to save oil fields and preserve American influence in the Middle East.
Mary McGrory's columns demonizing Saddam Hussein were republished in the September 3, 1990, issue of Newsweek, which is owned by the Washington Post Company.
Government officials generally did not believe that Saddam Hussein intended to invade Saudi Arabia, although the narrative of an imminent invasion was used to build public support for the U.S. war effort.
In a 1987 report, the Congressional Committees Investigating the Iran/Contra Affair noted that President Ronald Reagan viewed Saddam Hussein as a 'expletive'.
The Washington Post's August 7, 1990, edition featured a banner headline stating 'Saddam says Seizure of Kuwait Is Permanent.'
Saddam Hussein communicated to U.S. chargé d'affaires Joseph Wilson that Iraq was interested in establishing normal relations with the United States and denied reports of Iraqi military deployments along the Saudi border, characterizing them as fabrications intended to justify aggression against Iraq.
Saddam Hussein told UN Secretary General Pérez de Cuéllar in Baghdad that he would withdraw from Kuwait on August 5, 1990, provided that a mini-summit planned for August 4 in Jeddah was successful.
Washington Post columnist Jim Hoagland criticized Saddam Hussein's claim that dispossessed Arabs would profit from the seizure of Kuwait's oil in an August 9, 1990, article.
Saddam Hussein stated regarding the Gulf: "a graveyard for those who think of committing aggression."
The Boston Globe, Newsday, the Jerusalem Post, the New York Times, the Daily Telegraph, the Toronto Star, The Times (of London), and the Washington Times published the false account of the meeting between Saddam Hussein and Joseph Wilson.
Mary McGrory claimed in her Washington Post column that Saudi Arabia was in imminent danger of being invaded by Saddam Hussein.
Douglas Kellner argues that the U.S. State Department's justification for refusing to negotiate with Iraq was questionable because the Bush administration continued to refuse negotiations even after Saddam Hussein agreed to release all hostages.
Yasir Arafat delivered a letter from Saddam Hussein to a Palestinian businessman with White House contacts, addressed to George Bush, which confirmed that Iraq was ready to withdraw from Kuwait provided that its problems with Kuwait were resolved first.
ABC White House correspondent Brit Hume reported on August 7, 1990, that Saddam Hussein told the U.S. chargé d'affaires that he intended to claim Kuwait as his own and that intelligence reports indicated an 'imminent threat to Saudi Arabia' from Iraqi forces.
Edward Herman stated in Z Magazine that the U.S. mass media's failure to debate the issues surrounding the U.S. failure to constrain Saddam Hussein is 'prime evidence of their irresponsibility to the public and service to the state.'
The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) asserted that Saddam Hussein was prepared to invade Kuwait prior to the actual invasion, yet the George H.W. Bush administration did not take action.
Following the end of the Iran-Iraq war in August 1988, Iraqi President Saddam Hussein continued to build up his military machine with assistance from the West.
A Washington Post story indicated that Saddam Hussein was not prepared to negotiate a settlement to the Gulf crisis.
On August 3, 1990, George Will attacked Saddam Hussein as the 'Wolf of Babylon,' while Washington Post Op-Ed writers discussed Iraq's 'Nuclear Specter,' Charles Krauthammer criticized a 'festival of appeasement,' and a Washington Post editorial condemned the 'Aggression in the Gulf' and Saddam Hussein.
On July 31, 1990, Defense Intelligence Agency analyst Pat Lang wrote a memo warning top policy makers that Saddam Hussein intended to invade Kuwait, which he intended as a 'thunderclap' but which drew virtually no reaction.
Former national security adviser Robert McFarlane cited a Washington Post story as evidence that Saddam Hussein was not going to leave Kuwait and that U.S. military intervention in Saudi Arabia was necessary.
The transcript of the August 6, 1990, conversation between Joseph Wilson and Saddam Hussein supports the Iraqi version of events and suggests that the Washington Post version of the conversation was fabricated by the Bush administration and transmitted by the Post.
A business article in the Washington Post claimed that Saddam Hussein had become 'OPEC's Most Important Member' and controlled world oil prices.
The London-based Mideast Mirror reported that King Hussein of Jordan brought a peace proposal from Iraq to President George H.W. Bush, in which Saddam Hussein expressed willingness to negotiate a withdrawal of Iraqi troops from Kuwait, provided that U.N. sanctions were lifted and the U.S. military buildup in Saudi Arabia ended, with the exception of the restoration of the al-Sabah clan in Kuwait.
The Los Angeles Times and the Sunday Times of London presented the meeting between Saddam Hussein and Joseph Wilson as a turning point indicating Iraq would not negotiate a solution to the crisis.
United Press International reported on December 13, 1990, that Algerian President Chadli Benjedid was one of the few Arab leaders maintaining communication with both Saddam Hussein and the Saudi Arabian leadership, noting his history of successful mediations, such as the release of U.S. hostages in Iran in 1980.
Douglas Kellner characterizes the Washington Post's reporting on Saddam Hussein's threats as 'sheer disinformation' and argues the newspaper merely repeated Bush administration claims as fact.
Karsh and Rautsi (1991) reported on an August 6 meeting between Saddam Hussein and U.S. diplomat Joe Wilson: "During the [August 6] meeting [with Joe Wilson], Hussein was far more affable than in his bellicose encounter with Ms. Glaspie a fortnight earlier. 'Iraq is firmly willing to respect the United States' legitimate international interests in the Middle East,' he told Mr."
Emery (1991) claims, based on interviews with King Hussein of Jordan and other Arab sources, that Saddam Hussein was prepared to negotiate a solution to the Gulf crisis and withdraw from Kuwait, but the United States blocked these early negotiation attempts.
King Hussein of Jordan argued that if Saddam Hussein had intended to invade Saudi Arabia, he would have moved immediately when the Saudi army was small and untested.
Edward Herman expressed his view in Z Magazine that the Bush administration invited Saddam Hussein into Kuwait through 'sheer incompetence,' but also saw an opportunity to set him up as a 'naked aggressor who must be taught a lesson.'
The Bush administration continued to provide aid and favored treatment to Iraq despite Saddam Hussein's atrocious human rights record and the brutal suppression of Kurds in northern Iraq.
Patrick Tyler reported in the Washington Post: "Saddam called in the ranking U.S. diplomat in Baghdad, and told him categorically that Kuwait now belongs to Iraq and there was no going back, according to Administration officials. 'It's a done deal,' one U.S. official said, characterizing Saddam's message. Another official said Saddam appended a specific warning that if Saudi Arabia shuts down the Iraqi crude oil pipelines that cross the Saudi desert to the Red Sea, Iraq will attack the kingdom. The warning further stated that if American forces intervene in the region, Iraq will 'embarrass' the United States, the official said."
The United States government rejected Saddam Hussein's proposal for an Arab-only resolution to the Kuwait crisis, despite the United States' own historical policy of opposing outside interference in Latin America and the Caribbean.
John Kelly's statements were broadcast on the World Service of the BBC [British Broadcasting Corporation] and were heard in Baghdad. At a crucial hour, when war and peace hung in the balance, Kelly had sent Saddam Hussein a signal that could be read as a pledge that the United States would not intervene.
A National Security Council White Paper prepared in May 1990 asserted: "Iraq and Saddam Hussein are described as 'the optimum contenders to replace the Warsaw Pact' as the rationale for continuing cold war military spending and for putting an end to the 'peace dividend'."
In an August 9, 1990 editorial titled 'The U.S. Stands Up. Who Else?', the New York Times supported President George H.W. Bush's decision to commit U.S. forces to Saudi Arabia, stating: 'President Bush has drawn a line in the sand, committing U.S. forces to face down Saddam Hussein....On balance, he has made the right choice in the right way.'
Patrick Tyler wrote in a Washington Post summary article: "The initial move to seize Kuwait was relatively painless. But the next step that Saddam reportedly threatened yesterday--a possible invasion of Saudi Arabia--would pose immense difficulties for the Iraqi leader, forcing his army to operate far from home, at the end of long supply lines, in the intense summer heat of the desert" (p. A9).
Patrick Tyler, a writer for the Washington Post, shifted his characterization of Saddam Hussein from a 'pragmatic' Arab leader on May 13, 1989, to a 'brash and brutal leader' who terrorized neighbors and threatened chemical retaliation on August 3, 1990.
Following the invasion of Kuwait, Saddam Hussein threatened to turn the Gulf into "a graveyard for those who think of committing aggression" while simultaneously emphasizing the temporary nature of the Iraqi intervention.
On August 7, 1990, State Department spokesperson Margaret Tutweiler described Iraqi troops as massing on the border and presented Joseph Wilson's meeting with Saddam Hussein negatively, reinforcing the narrative that Iraq would not leave Kuwait, would not negotiate, and was about to invade Saudi Arabia.
Saddam Hussein miscalculated the international response to the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, believing that Western powers would allow the seizure because they had previously provided military support, technology, and economic arrangements to Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War.
A senior Central Command officer stated after the Persian Gulf War: "We still have no hard evidence that he ever intended to invade Saudi Arabia. We believe that he did. But none of the captured documents or prisoner debriefs has come up with anything hard [indicating an attack on the Saudi oil fields]."
U.S. Ambassador to Iraq April Glaspie told Saddam Hussein that the United States had 'no opinion' on the border dispute and other disputes between Iraq and Kuwait.
On August 19, 1990, Saddam Hussein proposed that the status of Kuwait be resolved exclusively by Arab states without external interference, citing the Syrian occupation of Lebanon and Morocco's actions in Western Sahara as precedents.
Saddam Hussein's political record demonstrates an instinctive inclination to appease rather than confront, and to defuse tensions rather than escalate, whenever he faced overwhelming opposition.
In a Washington Post column titled 'Force Hussein to Withdraw,' Jim Hoagland asserted that Saddam Hussein had gone to war to gain control of the oil fields of Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.
Saddam Hussein, in a speech at a meeting of the Arab Cooperation Council in Amman, Jordan, on February 24, 1990, advised Arab nations to stop investing money in the United States and instead invest in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union.
George Bush used the Gulf War crisis to divert attention from domestic economic problems by scapegoating Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait for rising oil prices and economic instability.
By 1990, the U.S. State Department had compiled a report on human rights abuses in Iraq, though the report did not significantly influence U.S. policy toward Saddam Hussein and Iraq.
The transcript of the meeting between Wilson and Saddam Hussein suggests that Hussein was willing to negotiate a solution to the Gulf crisis and had no intention of invading Saudi Arabia.
The New York Times reported on August 5, 1990, that an Arab mediation summit was postponed, noting that President Saddam Hussein was not prepared to attend and Saudi Arabia feared meeting without him would be perceived as an anti-Baghdad initiative.
The Washington Post's version of the meeting between Saddam Hussein and Joe Wilson was widely disseminated by Reuters and published in newspapers including the Toronto Star, USA Today, and Newsday.
During a visit to the United States on August 15, 1990, King Hussein of Jordan reportedly delivered a peace message from Saddam Hussein to President George H.W. Bush at his Kennebunkport vacation home.
In 1990, U.S. senators visited Iraq for Saddam Hussein's birthday and advised him that his negative international image was merely a product of Western media that could be corrected with a better public-relations policy.
The Bush administration compared Saddam Hussein to Hitler and accused Iraq of lying regarding its intentions.
The conversation between Joseph Wilson and Saddam Hussein on August 6, 1990, is documented in Salinger and Laurent (1991, pp. 137-147) and Sciolino (1991, pp. 284-293).
John Bulloch and Harvey Morris argued in 1991 that an Iraqi invasion of Saudi Arabia never seemed likely, despite public discourse regarding Saddam Hussein's plans to attack the kingdom.
The United States may have allowed Saddam Hussein to remain in power after the Gulf War because his continued presence created a climate that facilitated further U.S. arms sales and military intervention in the region.
Bush administration officials disseminated false information regarding a meeting between Saddam Hussein and the U.S. chargé d'affaires in Baghdad to mainstream media outlets.
On July 25, 1990, U.S. Ambassador to Iraq April Glaspie met with Saddam Hussein and expressed sympathy for his desire to raise oil prices to rebuild Iraq after the war with Iran.
Jim Hoagland believed that Saddam Hussein was so hated at home that his defeat by foreign forces would be greeted as deliverance by the Iraqi nation and much of the Arab world.
Edward Herman argued in Z Magazine that the U.S. failure to constrain Saddam Hussein diplomatically 'reflects either staggering incompetence or a remarkably sophisticated conspiracy to entrap him.'
The New York Times published several articles on August 5, 1990, critical of Iraq and Saddam Hussein, including headlines such as 'Arab of Vast Ambition--Saddam Hussein,' 'Iraq Makes Its Bid to Run the Show in the Middle East,' 'Stopping Saddam's Drive for Dominance,' and 'Stop Hussein with Force if Necessary.'
Diplomatic sources claimed in a December 18, 1990, United Press International report that Algerian President Chadli Benjedid attempted to arrange a meeting between Saddam Hussein and King Fahd of Saudi Arabia, but the Saudi kingdom discouraged the effort by failing to invite Benjedid to Riyadh.
Patrick Tyler published an article in the Washington Post on May 13, 1989, describing Saddam Hussein as pursuing the 'politics of pragmatism' and moderating Iraq's radical tradition in favor of friendly overtures to Arab moderates and the West.
In her March 1991 testimony, U.S. Ambassador April Glaspie claimed she had taken a tough approach with Saddam Hussein and that transcripts of her conversation with him omitted passages where she emphasized a 'vital' U.S. relationship with Kuwait and warned against settling disputes through non-peaceful means.
The Report of the Congressional Committees Investigating the Iran/Contra Affair documents that Oliver North told Iranian officials that the United States would help promote the overthrow of the Iraqi government led by Saddam Hussein.
On August 5, 1990, Saddam Hussein instructed Yasir Arafat to contact the Saudis to communicate that Iraq was ready to negotiate.
During a PBS discussion on August 7, 1990, co-anchor Judy Woodruff stated that Saddam Hussein was quoted in a Washington Post story as saying the invasion of Kuwait was irreversible and permanent.
CBS coverage justified President George H.W. Bush's refusal to negotiate and his militarist gestures by framing the situation as one where Bush held the strongest hand and saw no need to offer Saddam Hussein hope for a peaceful settlement.
Salinger and Laurent argue that U.S. officials April Glaspie and John Kelly inadvertently or intentionally gave Saddam Hussein a 'green light' to invade Kuwait.
Senator Alan Cranston charged that April Glaspie deliberately misled Congress regarding her role in the events leading to the Persian Gulf War after Senators reviewed the cable she sent to Washington following her conversation with Saddam Hussein.
Mary McGrory claimed in her Washington Post column that Americans were emotionally invested in removing Saddam Hussein due to concerns over high oil prices and potential hostage situations.