Türkiye
Also known as: Turkey, Republic of Turkey
Facts (92)
Sources
A Status Quo Power in a Changing Region: Iran's Regionalism in ... cambridge.org Dec 1, 2025 55 facts
claimIran has been motivated to advance the International North–South Transport Corridor (INSTC) through Armenian territory as a counter-measure to Turkey's promotion of transit routes like the Trans-Caspian East-West-Middle Corridor.
claimIran is concerned that Turkey aims to marginalize Iran from transit and energy routes in the South Caucasus.
measurementTrade volume between Iran and Turkey declined from $10 billion in 2016 to $5.6 billion in 2019, and further to $3.3 billion in 2020, a trend attributed to American sanctions against Tehran.
measurementTurkey’s trade volume with Azerbaijan and Georgia exceeded 10 billion dollars.
claimTurkey and the European Union share a mutual interest in developing the Middle Corridor, with the European Union aiming to diversify energy sources and improve supply chain resilience.
claimIran's foreign policy toward northern neighbors in Central Asia and the South Caucasus aimed to counterbalance the regional influence of Turkey and Russia.
claimIran's policy toward the South Caucasus is currently a passive measure primarily aimed at mitigating the strategic advancements of Turkey and Azerbaijan.
claimTehran is concerned that the de facto alliance between Israel, Turkey, and Azerbaijan in the South Caucasus mirrors US efforts to contain Iran in the Middle East.
perspectiveTurkey views the Middle Corridor as a key strategic component for reducing the dependency of Turkic nations on Russia and Iran.
perspectiveTehran regards the Zangezur Corridor as part of a broader strategy by Turkey and its NATO allies to destabilize Iran, as it would reduce Iran's geopolitical options by increasing its isolation in the South Caucasus.
claimIran perceives its influence in the South Caucasus as diminishing due to the growing influence of Turkey.
claimTurkey's robust alliance with Azerbaijan and its support for Azerbaijan's territorial claims against Armenia make a significant Turkish compromise unlikely, potentially straining Iran-Turkey relations.
claimThe Turkey-Azerbaijan alliance is becoming more influential, disrupting the long-standing equilibrium in the South Caucasus that Iran had been accustomed to.
claimRussia, Turkey, and Western nations are keen on sidelining Iran from the geoeconomic dynamics of the South Caucasus, specifically regarding East-West energy transfers.
claimTehran historically viewed increased Russian involvement in the South Caucasus as a factor that implied reduced activism by the USA, Turkey, and Israel in the region.
perspectiveIran views Turkey's ambition to create a link to the Caspian Sea and Central Asia via the Zangezur Corridor as a move to sever connections with Armenia, labeling the project as 'NATO’s Turanist corridor.'
claimTurkey is positioning itself as a potential mediator in the South Caucasus to enhance its geostrategic influence throughout the region.
claimIran may utilize the South Caucasus as a new front for its deterrence policy against regional rivals such as Turkey and Israel.
claimIran faces a strategic dilemma regarding Turkey: while a Turkey that is less reliant on NATO aligns with Iranian interests, Turkey's independent and bold regional approach causes concern in Tehran.
claimIran is concerned that Azerbaijan might be drawn into a 'Balkanization trap' against Iran, with support from Turkey and Israel.
perspectiveIran is concerned that Azerbaijan's strengthening relationships with Turkey and Israel could transform Azerbaijan into a strategic foothold for adversarial powers aiming to extend their influence into northern Iran.
perspectiveTehran perceives Turkey's pan-Turkic ambitions along Iran's northern border as a rising security threat, and believes that Azerbaijan and Turkey's efforts to invoke pan-Turkic sentiments are supported by Israel.
claimIran fears that Turkey's increasing geopolitical influence among Turkic peoples could destabilize Iran's Azeri-majority northern regions and threaten its territorial integrity.
claimIf the southern route of the Zangezur corridor is activated through Armenia’s province of Sivnik, Turkey could gain direct access to the Caspian Sea through Azerbaijan, bypassing Georgia, and from there to Central Asia.
claimThe proposed creation of the Zangezur corridor is a critical point of dispute because it would strengthen the Turkey-Azerbaijan alliance at the expense of Iran.
claimIran is more susceptible to the repercussions of local disputes in the South Caucasus than Turkey, Russia, or Georgia due to its geographic proximity.
claimIran advocates for a '3+3' regional framework for the South Caucasus, which would include the three South Caucasus countries alongside Russia, Iran, and Turkey.
claimThe underlying threat perception regarding Turkey's potential actions in the South Caucasus remains a critical factor driving the regional rivalry between Iran and Turkey.
claimTurkey has attempted to divert the China-Central Asia transit route away from Iran by establishing the Middle Corridor and the Caspian Corridor.
claimIran and Turkey have managed to navigate their disagreements in Syria and Iraq without resorting to direct confrontation.
claimRussia, Turkey, and Iran (the founders of the 'Astana Format') have sought to apply collaborative conflict management approaches used in Syria to the South Caucasus.
claimTurkey's principal objective is to foster a 'path-dependency' in its relationships with neighboring countries and regions by positioning itself as a central hub in East-West energy and transit corridors.
claimThe 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war and the ongoing Ukraine war have shifted regional power balances, allowing Turkey to strengthen strategic ties with Central Asian Turkic states and Azerbaijan through the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route and the Organization of Turkic States.
claimTurkey's goal of becoming a central hub for East-West energy and transit corridors requires active involvement on the ground, including military presence, in areas pivotal for transit corridors extending from China to Europe.
claimIran interprets Turkey's pan-Turkic initiatives in the South Caucasus as part of a broader strategy by Ankara to reinvigorate the Turkic world, specifically through the Organization of Turkic States, which includes Turkey, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, and Azerbaijan.
referenceRussia and Turkey have expanded their influence in the South Caucasus over the past decade, positioning the region as a key element within a geopolitical chessboard extending from the Mediterranean to the Caspian Sea.
claimThe expanding roles of Turkey and Israel, in partnership with Azerbaijan, have increased Iran's strategic concerns regarding the South Caucasus.
claimIf Turkey successfully normalizes ties with Armenia and establishes the Zangezur Corridor, it could geopolitically sideline Iran by directly connecting Turkey and Azerbaijan, thereby circumventing Iran and reducing its importance as a regional transit route.
claimBoth Iran and Russia prioritize maintaining friendly relations with Turkey to prevent Ankara from strengthening ties with the West and NATO.
claimThe establishment of the Middle Corridor would diminish the influence of Russia, Iran, and China in the South Caucasus and Central Asia, while simultaneously elevating the roles of Turkey and the European Union in Eurasian geoeconomic affairs.
claimThe operationalization of the Turkey-Nakhchivan-Baku route could position Turkey as a favored partner for China in West Asia, sidelining Iran in the South Caucasus transit dynamics.
referenceThe war in Ukraine has highlighted the geostrategic significance of the Middle Corridor as an alternative Eurasian transit route linking Asia and Europe through Central Asia, the Caspian Sea, and Turkey, according to Eldem (2023).
claimTurkey, Israel, and European states are asserting their influence more forcefully in the South Caucasus, contributing to growing complexities for Iran.
claimIran's failure to achieve its objectives in the South Caucasus has left it exposed to Turkey's regional ambitions.
claimThe potential collapse of Bashar al-Assad's regime in Syria and shifts in the Middle Eastern geopolitical landscape have tilted the balance of power to the detriment of Iran and Russia, while strengthening Turkey's position.
claimRussia's declining dominant position in the South Caucasus is allowing other actors, specifically Turkey and China, to increase their influence in the region.
claimThe relationship between Iran and Turkey is witnessing an intensified direct and indirect rivalry in the South Caucasus.
claimRussia and Turkey played decisive roles in the South Caucasus following the 2020 Karabakh war, while Iran was sidelined in the region's emerging geopolitical dynamics.
claimIran is apprehensive that Turkey may seek to establish the Zangezur Corridor, which would open a new front in the South Caucasus.
claimThe Belt and Road Initiative's proposed Northern Corridor would traverse Iranian territory, stretching from China through Central Asia and Iran to Turkey or the Mediterranean.
claimIran views Turkey as its primary competitor in the South Caucasus regarding geoeconomics.
claimVelayati linked recent events in the South Caucasus to American efforts to extend its strategy of containing Iran to the north, positioning the Turkey-Azerbaijan alliance as a proxy.
claimThe Middle Corridor links China to Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan via the ports of Aktau and Kurik in the Caspian Sea, extending to Turkey through Georgia.
claimTurkey is unlikely to escalate the situation in the South Caucasus as long as instability persists in Syria, because unpredictable developments in the Levant prevent Turkey from shifting its focus entirely to another front.
claimIran's primary concern regarding Baku's rhetoric is the escalating pan-Turkic ideology promoted by Turkey and Israel, rather than an immediate hard security threat.
Regional Powers Still Matter! - Giga- Hamburg giga-hamburg.de 12 facts
claimThe interest of Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey in Africa is not a new development, nor is it limited solely to the Horn of Africa.
referenceŞaban Kardaş authored 'Turkey: A Regional Power Facing a Changing International System' in Turkish Studies (2013).
claimThe scope of regional powers research has expanded to include countries such as South Korea, Turkey, Egypt, Indonesia, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, and Iran, as these nations have come to play a major role in shaping their respective regions.
claimThe interest of Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey in Africa is neither new nor limited to the Horn of Africa.
claimWhile Brazil and South Africa have experienced a loss of influence in recent years, Saudi Arabia and Turkey are actively striving to achieve regional power status.
referenceCountries such as Turkey, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, and Iran are increasingly categorized as regional powers due to their growing power capabilities and increased political activism (Kardaş 2013, Ogunnubi et al. 2017).
claimThe competition for regional leadership between Saudi Arabia and Iran, Turkey's increased foreign-policy activism, and the persistence of territorial disputes in the South China Sea indicate the growing salience of regions in world politics.
claimTurkey exerts major influence in the Black Sea, the Caucasus, the Middle East, and the Balkans.
claimTurkey is currently distancing itself from Europe while attempting to revive its historical Ottoman sphere of influence.
claimPopulism is on the rise among both traditional and non-traditional regional powers, with India under Narendra Modi and Turkey under Recep Tayyip Erdoğan serving as notable examples.
claimRecent endeavors by Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey in the Horn of Africa have raised concerns that the Middle Eastern struggle for hegemony might be replicated in that region.
claimThe recent endeavours of Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey in the Horn of Africa have raised fears that the Middle Eastern struggle for hegemony will be repeated in a region of vast geostrategic importance.
Tracing the geopolitical influence and regional power dynamics in ... link.springer.com Oct 22, 2025 11 facts
claimUnder President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Turkey implements Central Asian policies through cultural and educational programs, including the expansion of Turkish educational institutions and the provision of scholarships to Central Asian students.
claimNeorealism as a theoretical framework underplays soft power elements, such as Turkey’s cultural ties or Iran's networks, revealing its limitations in fully capturing multilayered interactions in Central Asia.
claimThe 'multi-vector' foreign policy model allows Central Asian countries to maintain equal partnerships with Russia while simultaneously developing alliances with China, Turkey, and Western powers.
accountFollowing the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union, Turkey pursued a policy of cooperation with Muslim republics in the Caucasus that possessed Turkish ethnicity, a goal scholars termed the 'lost Turkish dream.'
claimFollowing the start of the Russia-Ukraine war, Turkey developed the Southern Gas Corridor and the 3300 km Nabucco pipeline, a project valued at $5.6 billion intended to supply gas to Western Europe.
claimThe Organization of Turkic States (OTS), established in 2009, is being reinvigorated to bolster Turkey's influence in Central Asia by facilitating cooperation on economic development, energy, and transportation networks.
claimIndia, Iran, Turkey, and Afghanistan have utilized new opportunities arising from the rise of traditional powers to strengthen their presence in the Central Asian strategic region.
claimTurkey's foreign policy toward Central Asia combines historical objectives with modern practical goals.
claimTurkey faces limitations in regional expansion and seeks economical energy supplies from the Caucasus and Caspian Sea areas to meet future gas demands.
referenceMustafa Aydın analyzed Turkey's role in Central Asia in a 2024 book chapter titled 'Türkiye in Central Asia' within the volume 'Central Asia in a multipolar world'.
claimGreat powers, including the US, China, Russia, Turkey, and the EU, influence Central Asia through military cooperation, investments in energy and transportation corridors, and diplomatic initiatives to incorporate the region into geoeconomic frameworks like the Eurasian Economic Union or the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).
Experts react: How the US war with Iran is playing out around the ... atlanticcouncil.org Mar 1, 2026 6 facts
claimTurkey hosts the Küreçik radar station and İncirlik Air Base as a NATO member.
measurementTurkey's inflation rate was approximately 31 percent as of early 2026.
perspectiveThe Turkish presidential office announced that Turkey is not allowing the Küreçik radar station or İncirlik Air Base to be utilized for offensive attacks against its neighbors.
measurementIran provides approximately 15 percent of Turkey’s natural gas supply.
measurementTurkey shares a 330-mile border with Iran.
measurementTurkey currently hosts over 3.5 million Syrian refugees.
The Expanding Iran War - ISPI ispionline.it 2 facts
claimTurkey fears that a resurgent Kurdish insurgency or Iranian state fragmentation could derail ongoing talks regarding the disarmament and dissolution of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK).
perspectiveTurkey condemns the US-Israeli strikes on Iran while simultaneously criticizing Iran for widening the war by targeting Gulf states.
Iranian proxy network in Middle East is in disarray, experts ... jpost.com Jan 27, 2025 1 fact
claimDonald Trump's 'Cotton Road' initiative is a project that seeks to isolate Iran by fostering stronger economic ties among Saudi Arabia, India, and other key regional players, while sidelining Iran and potentially Turkey.
Power Transition in the Middle East: The Intersection of US Global ... populismstudies.org Mar 15, 2026 1 fact
claimIsrael, Greece, and Cyprus have developed an institutionalized trilateral framework for security, maritime coordination, energy cooperation, connectivity, and technological partnership that excludes Turkey.
We Bombed the Wrong Target Iran's Proxy Network Strategy irregularwarfare.org Mar 10, 2026 1 fact
claimSpain, Chile, Russia, China, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Egypt have voiced concern or condemnation regarding U.S. unilateral coercive action against Iran's proxy network.
The EU's Open Strategic Autonomy and the challenge of ... globalpolicyjournal.com Aug 27, 2025 1 fact
claimThe European Union's leadership through the Carbon Border Adjustment Measure (CBAM) has prompted competitive approximation by China, gradual adjustment by the United States (pre-Trump II), and diplomatic openings for joint schemes with Canada, the United Kingdom, and Türkiye.
How to Handle Iran's Nuclear Ambitions - New Lines Institute newlinesinstitute.org Jul 23, 2025 1 fact
claimIf Iran proliferates nuclear weapons, Israel's nuclear posture may shift dramatically, and regional proliferation may become more likely as actors such as Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, and Egypt have expressed interest in nuclear deterrence.
United States and Iran on the Brink: What's at Stake? - CSIS csis.org 1 fact
claimThe Turkish government is concerned that a collapse of the Iranian state could lead to an influx of millions of Iranian refugees into Turkey, similar to events during the Iran-Iraq War.