The human role in climate change is considered 'unequivocal' and 'incontrovertible'.
Nearly all actively publishing climate scientists agree that humans are causing climate change.
The Union of Concerned Scientists publishes activist resources and explainers regarding climate change.
In a survey regarding whether climate change is occurring, 67.1% of respondents very much agreed, 26.7% agreed to a large extent, 6.2% agreed to a small extent, and 0% disagreed.
In a 2013 survey of 283 scientists, 43% very much agreed that most of recent or near future climate change is or will be a result of anthropogenic causes, 28.5% agreed to a large extent, 16.6% agreed to a small extent, and 2.5% did not agree at all.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) presents reports summarizing the strength and extent of consensus on climate change and its various aspects to the member states of the United Nations.
A study published in Environmental Research Letters and reported by the Cornell Chronicle found that more than 99.9% of studies agree that humans caused climate change.
In a survey of scientists, 41.8% agreed very much that climate change poses a very serious and dangerous threat to humanity, 23.2% agreed to a large extent, and 3.5% did not agree at all.
Surveyed scientists rejected the notion that there was too much uncertainty to justify taking immediate action regarding climate change, with a mean rating of 5.6 out of 7.
In a 2013 survey of 283 scientists, 74.7% of respondents indicated they very much agreed (on a 7-point scale) that climate change, whether natural or anthropogenic, is occurring now, while 2.9% were neutral and 2.1% disagreed.
In the 5th International Survey of Climate Scientists (2015-2016), 79.3% of respondents indicated they were very convinced that climate change is occurring, while 2.1% were not convinced.
Some organizations with members in extractive industries hold non-committal positions on climate change, and some have attempted to sow doubt in the scientific consensus by persuading the public that climate change is not happening or is not caused by human influence.
Among 79 climatologists who published over half of their peer-reviewed research on climate change, 76 agreed that mean global temperatures had risen compared to pre-1800s levels, and 75 described human activity as a significant factor.
In a survey regarding whether recent or near-future climate change is a result of anthropogenic causes, 34.6% of respondents very much agreed, 48.9% agreed to a large extent, 15.1% agreed to a small extent, and 1.35% did not agree.
Naomi Oreskes analyzed the abstracts of 928 scientific papers on 'global climate change' published between 1993 and 2003.
Of the 928 scientific papers on global climate change analyzed by Naomi Oreskes, 75% explicitly supported the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change or accepted it as a given, while 25% focused on research methods or paleoclimate analysis; no abstract explicitly rejected the consensus.
A 2018 US government report warned that climate change will shrink the US economy and cause thousands of deaths.
In the 2007 Harris Interactive survey of American Meteorological Society and American Geophysical Union members, 41% of scientists described the likely severity of climate change effects over the next 50–100 years as catastrophic, 44% as moderately dangerous, and 13% as having relatively little danger.
John Cook examined 11,944 abstracts from peer-reviewed scientific literature published between 1991 and 2011 that matched the topics 'global climate change' or 'global warming'.
In a survey regarding the extent to which respondents agree that climate change is mostly the result of anthropogenic causes, the average agreement score shifted from 4.17 to 3.62 between 1996 and 2003.
In a survey regarding whether climate change poses a serious and dangerous threat to humanity, 34.6% of respondents very much agreed, 27.6% agreed to a large extent, and 1.1% did not agree at all.
In the 5th International Survey of Climate Scientists (2015-2016), 47.7% of respondents very much agreed that recent or near-future climate change is a result of anthropogenic causes.
Of the 928 scientific papers on 'global climate change' analyzed by Naomi Oreskes, 75% explicitly supported the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change or accepted it as a given, while 25% focused on research methods or paleoclimate analysis; no abstract explicitly rejected the scientific consensus.
The Policy Institute of King's College London published a report titled 'Public perceptions on climate change' in June 2022 as part of the PERITIA Trust EU project.
A 2021 study by Mark Lynas, Benjamin Z. Houlton, and Simon Perry found that greater than 99% of peer-reviewed scientific literature agrees that climate change is human-caused.
In an October 2011 survey of 489 actively working scientists regarding the likely effects of global climate change in the next 50 to 100 years, 13% of respondents rated the effects as trivial/mild (1-3 on a 10-point scale), 44% as moderate (4-7), 41% as severe/catastrophic (8-10), and 2% did not know.
Surveyed scientists agreed there was substantial uncertainty about how strongly climate change impacts will affect society and that many changes would likely be necessary to adapt.
Researchers identified 28 papers that presented alternative hypotheses regarding the cause of climate change after explicitly searching the entire dataset for such alternatives.
Studies of scientific opinion on climate change have been undertaken since the 1970s, and they have established widespread consensus since the 1990s, with the level of agreement increasing over time.
In the 2007 Harris Interactive survey of scientists, 56% described the study of global climate change as a mature science, while 39% described it as an emerging science.
In a survey regarding the occurrence of climate change, 67.1% of respondents very much agreed it is occurring, 26.7% agreed to a large extent, 6.2% agreed to a small extent, and 0% did not agree at all.
In the 5th International Survey of Climate Scientists, 47.7% of respondents 'very much agreed' that recent or near-future climate change is a result of anthropogenic causes, while 1.9% did not agree at all.
Human activities causing global warming include fossil fuel combustion, cement production, and land use changes such as deforestation, with a significant supporting role from other greenhouse gases such as methane and nitrous oxide.
The overall split in agreement regarding anthropogenic causes of climate change shifted from 41% agreement and 45% disagreement in 1996 to 56% agreement and 30% disagreement in 2003.
In a survey regarding whether recent or near-future climate change is a result of anthropogenic causes, 34.6% of respondents very much agreed, 48.9% agreed to a large extent, 15.1% agreed to a small extent, and 1.35% did not agree at all.
The small percentage of scientific papers that disagreed with the consensus on climate change often contained errors or could not be replicated.
In the 1991 Center for Science, Technology, and Media survey, 58 scientists agreed that the effects of climate change were expected to be substantial by the scientific community as a whole, while 36 disagreed and 21 remained neutral.
Slade surveyed 21 climate scientists, finding that 17 of them expressed a strong belief in the reality of significant climate change.
In the 2007 Harris Interactive survey of American Meteorological Society and American Geophysical Union members, 56% described the study of global climate change as a mature science and 39% as an emerging science.
In the 5th International Survey of Climate Scientists (2015-2016), 46% of respondents very much agreed that climate change poses a very serious and dangerous threat to humanity.
Marianne Lavelle reported in U.S. News & World Report on 23 April 2008 that surveys track growing concern among scientists regarding climate change.
In a survey regarding whether climate change poses a serious and dangerous threat to humanity, 34.6% of respondents very much agreed, 27.6% agreed to a large extent, and 1.1% did not agree.
Of the 928 scientific paper abstracts on global climate change analyzed by Naomi Oreskes, 25% focused on research methods or paleoclimate analysis.
In the 2021 study led by Krista Myers, the level of agreement that human activity causes climate change was lowest among scientists who identified Economic Geology as one of their fields of research, at 84%.
Naomi Oreskes analyzed the abstracts of 928 scientific papers on global climate change published between 1993 and 2003.
When asked about the likely effects of global climate change in the next 50 to 100 years on a scale of 1 (trivial) to 10 (catastrophic), 13% of respondents in an October 2011 survey of scientists replied 1 to 3, 44% replied 4 to 7, 41% replied 8 to 10, and 2% did not know.
Individual scientists, universities, and laboratories contribute to the scientific opinion on climate change via peer-reviewed publications, while scientific bodies of national or international standing summarize collective agreement and relative certainty in synthesis reports.
A 2021 study led by Krista Myers surveyed 2780 Earth scientists and found that agreement that human activity causes climate change ranged from 91% among all scientists to 100% among climate scientists with high levels of expertise (20+ papers published).
In the 5th International Survey of Climate Scientists (2015-2016), 75.8% of respondents reported that uncertainty in climate science had decreased since 1996, and 75.7% reported that the risk associated with climate change had increased considerably since 1996.
Krishna Ramanujan reported in the Cornell Chronicle that more than 99.9% of scientific studies agree that humans caused climate change.
Climate change has made many severe and extreme weather events, such as tropical cyclones, thunderstorms, tornados, droughts, heat waves, and precipitation extremes, more severe, more frequent, or more likely to co-occur globally.
A 2019 review of scientific papers found the consensus on the cause of climate change to be at 100%.
A 2021 study concluded that over 99% of scientific papers agree on the human cause of climate change.
In 1978, the National Defense University of the United States surveyed 24 experts regarding near-term climate change and its effects on agriculture, with the majority expecting warming between 1970 and 2000 and identifying human carbon dioxide emissions as the primary cause.
In a 2013 survey of 283 scientists, when asked how convinced they were that most of recent or near-future climate change is or will be a result of anthropogenic causes, 43% very much agreed, 28.5% agreed to a large extent, 16.6% agreed to a small extent, and 2.5% did not agree at all.
There is a very strong consensus in the scientific literature that global surface temperatures have increased in recent decades and that the trend is caused by human-induced emissions of greenhouse gases.
In the 2021 study led by Krista Myers, 98.7% of climate scientists agreed that human activity causes climate change, while 84% of scientists who identified Economic Geology as a field of research agreed.
In a survey regarding the extent to which respondents agree that climate change is mostly the result of anthropogenic causes, the percentage of respondents 'strongly disagreeing' remained at 10%, while those remaining neutral were 14% in 1996 and 13% in 2003.