Aaron Antonovsky's work posits that the sense of coherence functions as a fundamentally individual and collective social capability that plays a central role in health.
The authors of the article argue that applying homeostasis to health promotes a dynamic view of health, where a healthy organism responds to challenges by mobilizing internal resources.
The authors of 'Homeostasis and Health: From Balance to Change' define health as an adaptive process occurring in interaction with the environment, rather than a fixed state of well-being or absence of disease.
The framework for the relationship between homeostasis and health posits that living systems must continuously undergo internal and behavioral changes to maintain viability.
The authors of 'Homeostasis and Health: From Balance to Change' argue that health should be viewed as adaptive change rather than a state based on stability and balance.
A complete state of health is an ideal, and a biological system is always in movement along the health continuum by deploying strategies that are suboptimal and constantly revised.
Homeostatic equilibrium is considered a prerequisite for health, whereas disrupted equilibrium, or dyshomeostasis, characterizes disease.
Dussault and Gagné-Julien (2015) argue that homeostasis can ground a naturalization of health that avoids reliance on population statistics and accounts for situation-specificity.
The cybernetic interpretation of homeostasis characterizes the environment primarily as a source of perturbations that an organism must block or compensate for, which limits the understanding of health in relation to the environment.
The cybernetic model of homeostasis assumes that health coincides with a state of equilibrium, stability, or balance.
Health is characterized by adaptivity and versatility, which is the capacity of an organism to recruit physiological resources to modify itself to maintain viability in changing circumstances.
Lemoine (2025) views health as the imperfect balance and integration of various homeostatic mechanisms across different levels of biological organization, and defines disease as the impairment of this state.
The concept of health within the framework discussed in 'Homeostasis and Health: From Balance to Change' is not univocal, as an individual's position along the health continuum depends on specific individual, populational, environmental, and social factors.
The authors of 'Homeostasis and Health: From Balance to Change' argue that employing the notion of homeostasis fosters a dynamic view of health, which contrasts with common views that define health as a complete state of well-being or the absence of disease.
The role of the environment in health has been emphasized by researchers including Bechtel (1985), Dussault and Gagné-Julien (2015), and Menatti et al. (2022).
The concept of health comprises two primary elements: maintaining physiological functions despite perturbations or recovering them after disease, and coordinating and integrating different physiological functions or systems.
The authors of the article 'Homeostasis and Health: From Balance to Change' argue that health should be conceived not as a fixed state of well-being or absence of disease, but as an adaptive process occurring in interaction with the environment.
Huber et al. (2011) criticize the 1948 World Health Organization definition of health as 'a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being' because it describes a static state, minimizes the role of the individual, and is difficult to operationalize.
Dussault and Gagné-Julien (2015) define health as the ability to homeostatically maintain the normal functions of an organism's organs and body to ensure survival.
Boorse (1977) criticizes the use of homeostasis to naturalize health, arguing that while homeostatic processes are important for physiology, they are insufficient to define health and disease.
The authors of the article advocate for a shift in the perspective on health from one based on stability to one focused on the capability for change, arguing that biological systems often respond to perturbations by changing themselves rather than returning to an initial or normal state.
Advocates of homeostatic medicine, such as Wang and Qin (2022), explicitly link the concept of health as homeostasis and disease as dyshomeostasis to Galenic and traditional Chinese medicine.
The traditional cybernetic interpretation of homeostasis defines health as the maintenance of stability and balance, where physiological states are preserved or returned to a setpoint after a perturbation.
Adaptivity, versatility, and change are the three defining features of the framework for the relationship between homeostasis and health.
Bechtel (1985) proposes an account of health as homeostasis, conceptualizing health as the capacity to perform the functions of life, which allows a system to survive and replicate despite environmental fluctuations.
Ayres (2020) characterizes health as 'vigor,' a property maintained over time by evolved homeostatic control mechanisms that constantly operate to control an organism's plasticity.
Saad and Prochaska (2020) define health as a maintainable ease of functioning, while defining disease as a state of prolonged dysfunction that prevents that ease.
The normative value of homeostatic mechanisms for health lies in establishing and modulating conditions necessary for the functioning of parts, so those parts can contribute to the maintenance of the whole system.
The alternative view of health presented in 'Homeostasis and Health: From Balance to Change' defines health as the capability for adaptive change, specifically the ability to realize different viable physiological regimes adapted to the internal and external conditions an organism faces at a given time.
Veen et al. (2020) define health as the ability to maintain homeostasis, which they describe as the maintenance of specific variables within an optimal range regardless of external stimuli.
Eberl (2016) defines health in the field of immunology as a homeostatic equilibrium between different types of immune activities, while an unhealthy state is defined as one exhibiting disequilibrium.
The concept of health within the framework discussed in the source text is not univocal, as an individual's position along the health continuum depends on the specificity of individual, populational, environmental, and social factors.
The authors of the article argue that current accounts connecting health with homeostasis share common limits because they rely, to varying degrees, on a cybernetic perspective of homeostasis based on feedback and setpoints.
The view of health based on adaptivity and change operationalizes health by identifying multiple mechanisms involved in physiological regulation, rather than relying on classical accounts of health as well-being and the absence of disease.
Dussault and Gagné-Julien (2015) advocate for a notion of health defined as the homeostatic maintenance or restoration of design.
Ayres argues that classic accounts of health as a state of 'well-being' or 'absence of disease' are passive or reactive, and that simply removing an insult or antagonizing a disease pathogenesis pathway is insufficient to promote health.
In medicine, the cybernetic interpretation of homeostasis characterizes health as a stable physiological state that an organism must preserve or return to following a perturbation.
Huber et al. (2011) propose replacing the 1948 World Health Organization definition of health with the definition: 'the ability to adapt and to self-manage.'
Sumrall and O’Malley (2024) argue that the modern medical tendency to equate health with balance and disease with unbalance may be an inheritance from pre-modern medicine, such as Galenic medicine's focus on the balance of humors, and lacks scientific grounding.
The view of health based on adaptivity and change rejects the assumption that balance is the core of health and avoids the limitations associated with the cybernetic view of health.
The cybernetic view of homeostasis implicitly assumes that balance, stability, and equilibrium are inherently good and associated with health, while unbalance, disequilibrium, and instability are associated with pathology.
Health can be defined as adaptive variation along a continuum, with an ideal state of health and death as the two poles, defined by the action of regulatory mechanisms and environmental conditions.
Health is defined by two primary elements: maintaining physiological functions despite perturbations or recovering them after disease, and coordinating and integrating different physiological functions or systems.
Menatti, Bich, and Saborido (2022) propose a situated relational account of health and environment, moving from the concept of adaptation to adaptivity.
In medicine, homeostasis is utilized to support the concept of health as a regime that requires maintenance.
Dussault and Gagné-Julien (2015) discussed health, homeostasis, and the situation-specificity of normality in Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics.
The maintenance of the capacity to perform the functions of life, which is associated with health, requires continuous modification of ongoing physiological regimes (Bechtel 1985).
Menatti et al. (2022) argue that health is not merely an intrinsic property of a system, but requires focusing on both the organism and the environment to which the system adapts and responds homeostatically.