concept

epistemology

Also known as: epistemologists

synthesized from dimensions

Epistemology, derived from the Greek *episteme* (knowledge) and *logos* (study), is the foundational branch of philosophy dedicated to the study of knowledge—its nature, scope, sources, structure, and limits study of knowledge, the nature, origin, and limits. While the field’s roots are as ancient as philosophy itself, with Plato often cited as a foundational figure for his systematization of rationalism as old as any other philosophy, founder of ancient rationalism, the term "epistemology" was formally introduced into philosophical discourse in the mid-19th century, appearing in print as early as 1847 and popularized by James Frederick Ferrier in 1854 early usage, first named by.

At its core, epistemology is a normative discipline that evaluates beliefs to determine if they are rational and justified evaluating beliefs, normative discipline, whereas psychology. It distinguishes itself from descriptive fields like psychology, which focuses on how beliefs are acquired, and education, which focuses on the transmission of knowledge psychology vs epistemology, education vs epistemology. Epistemologists generally assume that knowledge is factive—requiring a connection to objective truth—and that mere true belief is insufficient for knowledge; it must also be properly justified to avoid being correct merely by accident knowledge is factive, mere true belief does not qualify, role of justification in epistemology.

A central tension in the field is the Internal-External (IE) debate regarding the nature of justification. Internalists argue that justification depends solely on factors internal to the believer’s mind, whereas externalists contend that external conditions or reliable cognitive processes are necessary for justification Internal-External debate, internalist vs externalist. This is closely linked to the "regress problem," which challenges how beliefs can be justified without falling into an infinite chain of reasoning regress problem. Various structural theories, such as foundationalism (which posits basic, self-evident beliefs) and infinitism (which rejects the constraints of finite chains), attempt to resolve this dilemma foundationalism structure, infinitism solution.

Contemporary epistemology has expanded significantly beyond traditional individualistic frameworks. Naturalized epistemology, championed by figures like W.V.O. Quine, advocates for integrating empirical insights from psychology and the natural sciences into the study of knowledge naturalistic epistemology, epistemology as a 'chapter of psychology'. Conversely, virtue epistemology shifts the focus to the knower as an agent, emphasizing intellectual character and virtues such as humility or intellectual rigor focus on the agent, importance of intellectual and epistemic virtues. Some scholars even argue that because these virtues are moral in nature, epistemology should be understood as a branch of ethics epistemology is a branch of ethics.

Furthermore, the field now encompasses social epistemology, which examines collective knowledge acquisition and systemic issues like epistemic injustice subfield of epistemology that addresses, respond to forms of epistemic injustice. Epistemology today intersects with diverse disciplines, including cognitive science, decision theory, anthropology, and artificial intelligence, providing a rigorous framework for understanding how we know what we know in an increasingly complex world intersects with decision theory on rational beliefs, AI via Wheeler and Pereira.

Model Perspectives (9)
openrouter/x-ai/grok-4.1-fast definitive 88% confidence
Epistemology, as described in key philosophical resources, broadly concerns issues related to the creation and dissemination of knowledge in specific areas of inquiry, assuming the existence of objective truth that beliefs can match or fail to match, according to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy by Matthias Steup and Ram Neta. It encompasses core methods like conceptual analysis, which involves seeking counterexamples to definitions, per OpenStax, and particularism, starting from specific cases and intuitions as in Wikipedia. Central concepts include justification via J-factors determining belief status Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, the Mentalism principle that mental similarity implies justificational parity Stanford by Steup and Neta, and reliabilism where beliefs from reliable processes like perception are justified Wikipedia. Sources of knowledge involve perception, non-perception for absences, presumption Wikipedia, inference from facts Wikipedia, and testimony from others Stanford Encyclopedia. Debates feature internalism-externalism on justification factors Wikipedia, regress arguments distinguishing basic and non-basic beliefs Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, and naturalism seeking empirical definitions Stanford. Historical notes include the term's use by 1847 Wikipedia and Plato as ancient rationalism founder The Collector. It intersects with decision theory on rational beliefs Wikipedia, cognitive science, and fields like Indian and African traditions.
openrouter/google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview definitive 100% confidence
Epistemology, a branch of philosophy formally designated in the 19th century [9], is fundamentally defined as the study of knowledge [32, 52]. The field examines the nature, scope, sources, structure, and limits of knowledge [36, 43], with many scholars holding that for a proposition to be considered known, it must be true and the believer must possess a well-justified belief [6, 30]. Methodologically, epistemology relies on argumentation [26] and conceptual analysis, which involves searching for counterexamples to proposed definitions [5]. A primary, enduring task for many epistemologists is responding to the Cartesian skeptic, who argues that knowledge is impossible because one cannot rule out the possibility of massive deception [8]. Debates within the field often center on the relationship between justification and the believer's mind. Internalism maintains that justification depends solely on factors internal to the mind [17, 42], whereas externalist theories do not require the believer to have cognitive access to these factors [42]. Another significant divide exists between traditionalists, who may proceed without scientific input to address skepticism [22], and naturalists. Naturalists, such as Alvin Goldman, argue that epistemology "needs help" from science, with "cooperative naturalism" asserting that empirical results are essential for investigating knowledge [27, 55]. Other specialized approaches include virtue epistemology, which considers the state of the individual's intellect and social context [44, 59], and the epistemology of pragmatism, which views knowledge as a self-correcting process based on experience [24]. Historically, the modern focus on epistemology was cemented by René Descartes and John Locke, who defined "ideas" as internal representations [2]. Today, the field intersects with diverse disciplines, including cognitive science, decision theory, anthropology, and artificial intelligence, the latter of which uses these insights for automatic reasoning and knowledge representation [15, 47].
openrouter/google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview definitive 100% confidence
Epistemology, also referred to as the theory of knowledge theory of knowledge, is defined broadly as the study of knowledge and justified belief, or more specifically as the study of issues concerning the creation and dissemination of knowledge in particular areas of inquiry study of knowledge. The term was first used as a label for a branch of philosophy by James Frederick Ferrier in 1854 first named by, though it appeared in print as early as 1847 early usage. At its core, the field evaluates beliefs to determine if they are rational and justified evaluating beliefs, distinguishing itself from psychology, which describes how beliefs are acquired psychology vs epistemology, and education, which focuses on the transmission of knowledge education vs epistemology. Epistemology assumes knowledge is factive, requiring a fact of the matter to be known knowledge is factive, and explores three primary types of knowledge: propositional, practical, and knowledge by acquaintance types of knowledge. Contemporary debates often center on the Internal-External (IE) divide, which questions whether justification arises from internal mental states or external conditions Internal-External debate. Other significant discussions include: * Structural theories: Approaches like foundherentism foundherentism theory and infinitism infinitism solution attempt to resolve the regress problem regarding how beliefs are justified regress problem. * Naturalized epistemology: Some thinkers, such as W.V.O. Quine, argue that epistemology should be integrated with empirical psychology and the natural sciences naturalistic epistemology, a view contested by philosophers like Alvin Goldman who maintain a role for a priori philosophy Goldman's approach. * Virtue and Ethics: Scholars such as Linda Zagzebski and Lorraine Code emphasize the role of intellectual character, virtue, and moral normativity intellectual virtue, while others, such as Jonathan Kvanvig, argue that traditional frameworks should be abandoned to make room for these considerations abandoning traditional frameworks.
openrouter/google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview definitive 100% confidence
Epistemology, a term coined by James Frederick Ferrier in 1856, is the branch of philosophy dedicated to the study of knowledge, its nature, and its construction study of knowledge and related phenomena. It distinguishes itself from ontology, which focuses on what exists, by examining how humans acquire and understand knowledge distinguishes between ontology and epistemology. Central to the field is the concept of justification, which seeks to prevent true beliefs from being correct merely by accident role of justification in epistemology. Epistemologists often work to define knowledge through a set of individually necessary and jointly sufficient conditions seeking a set of conditions, though they generally agree that mere true belief is insufficient mere true belief does not qualify. The field is deeply contested by several core debates, including the internalist-externalist divide regarding whether justification depends solely on internal mental states or also on external factors factors other than mental states. Furthermore, the "regress problem" poses a significant challenge, as the requirement for a belief to be grounded in another justified belief may lead to an infinite chain arises from the requirement. Modern epistemological discourse also includes specialized subfields such as social epistemology, which examines collective knowledge acquisition subfield of epistemology that addresses, and virtue epistemology, which shifts focus to intellectual traits like humility or arrogance importance of intellectual and epistemic virtues. Some theorists, such as Linda Zagzebski, have even suggested that because intellectual virtues are a subset of moral virtues, epistemology should be viewed as a branch of ethics epistemology is a branch of ethics. Meanwhile, perspectives like cooperative naturalism advocate for incorporating empirical insights from psychology to advance the field essential or useful for making progress.
openrouter/google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview definitive 100% confidence
Epistemology is a core branch of philosophy dedicated to the study of knowledge, specifically examining its nature, origins, and limits the study of knowledge, the nature, origin, and limits. While the term itself is relatively recent, the field is as ancient as philosophy itself as old as any other philosophy. It operates as a normative discipline—concerned with how beliefs *should* be acquired and evaluated—distinguishing it from descriptive fields like psychology normative discipline, whereas psychology. A central concern of epistemology is the structure of justification focus on the structure of. Debates often center on how to avoid infinite regress, with foundationalism proposing self-evident axioms as a base basic beliefs are necessary and coherentism evaluating beliefs based on their inter-relatedness validates other beliefs and justifications. The field also grapples with the "generality problem," which complicates the assessment of whether specific cognitive processes are reliable impossible to know if a belief is justified. Modern discourse includes significant debate over the role of empirical science. Some, such as W.V.O. Quine, argue for a naturalized approach where epistemology is treated as a chapter of psychology epistemology as a 'chapter of psychology', though this is contested by virtue epistemologists who maintain the field's prescriptive nature oppose W.V.O. Quine's suggestion. Furthermore, the scope of the field has expanded to include social epistemology, which addresses systems of interaction and epistemic injustice redress the traditional individualistic focus, respond to forms of epistemic injustice.
openrouter/google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview definitive 100% confidence
Epistemology, derived from the Greek words *episteme* (knowledge) and *logos* (study or science), is the branch of philosophy dedicated to the theory and nature of knowledge study of knowledge. It explores the principles by which various disciplines arrive at knowledge, while evaluating the limits, sources, and justification of beliefs study of knowledge. Key debates in the field often center on the criteria for knowledge. Epistemology typically requires that knowledge involve truth and objective reality requires truth and reality, and it distinguishes between *a priori* and *a posteriori* knowledge distinguishes knowledge types. A central tension exists between internalists, who accept only internal justifications for beliefs, and externalists, who argue that external factors determine justification internalist vs externalist. Theoretical structures such as foundationalism, which posits a hierarchy of basic beliefs, and infinitism, which rejects the constraints of infinite regress, attempt to solve problems regarding how knowledge is supported foundationalism structure. Contemporary approaches have expanded these traditional boundaries. Virtue epistemology shifts focus to the knower as an agent, emphasizing intellectual virtues focus on the agent, while naturalized epistemology, famously championed by W.V.O. Quine, suggests shifting focus toward empirical processes and psychology focus on empirical processes. Additionally, metaepistemology serves as a metatheory that examines the background assumptions and research methods of the field itself examines background assumptions.
openrouter/x-ai/grok-4.1-fast definitive 88% confidence
Epistemology is consistently portrayed across multiple sources as the philosophical study of knowledge, encompassing its nature, acquisition, justification, and societal acceptance. According to Edelheim (2014 via Cambodian Education Forum), it explains why society deems certain things true study of knowledge and truth decisions. Killam (2013) describes it as addressing the theory of knowledge and how it is acquired theory of knowledge acquisition, while Crotty (1998) positions it as the theory embedded in methodology theory of knowledge in methodology. Bryman (2012) views it as a stance on acceptable knowledge stance on acceptable knowledge, and Klein (2005) ranks it as a core philosophy area dealing with human knowledge core area on human knowledge. Key works include W.V. Quine's 'Epistemology Naturalized' (1969), advocating integration with science Quine 'Epistemology Naturalized' essay, and Alvin Goldman's 'Epistemology and Cognition' (1986 via Harvard University Press and Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), bridging epistemology and cognitive science Goldman epistemology-cognition intersection. Naturalized approaches, per Quine (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), see epistemology collapsing into sciences like psychology epistemology into sciences, with Goldman emphasizing empirical aid Goldman needs empirical sciences. Thomas Reid's work, explored by Wolterstorff (Cambridge University Press) and in 'Inquiry and Essays' (1983), traces non-reductionism Reid non-reductionism origins. Contemporary entries by Steup and Neta (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2024) synthesize the field Steup-Neta epistemology entry. Subfields include social contexts (Goldman 1999), testimony (Dummett 1994 via Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy), cross-cultural concerns (Springer), and intersections with mind, anthropology, and science.
openrouter/x-ai/grok-4.1-fast definitive 88% confidence
Epistemology is a foundational branch of philosophy extensively covered in encyclopedias and handbooks, such as the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry edited by Matthias Steup and Ram Neta, which cites seminal works by Fred Dretske on epistemic operators, Keith DeRose on skeptical problems, and numerous theorists like William Alston and Laurence BonJour. The term 'epistemology' emerged as early as 1847 in New York's Eclectic Magazine (Wikipedia), with Plato regarded as the founder of ancient rationalism for systematizing knowledge sources and criteria. Introductory texts include Nicholas Rescher's 2003 book (Cambodian Education Forum) and Avrum Stroll's 2023 Britannica entry (Wikipedia). Specialized entries address Indian schools by Stephen Phillips and Anand Vaidya (Stanford Encyclopedia), virtue-based approaches like James Montmarquet's conception (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy), and African theories by Chimakonam and Ogbonnaya (Wikipedia). It intersects with cognitive science and philosophy of mind per Carlos Montemayor at San Francisco State (MIT Press), AI via Wheeler and Pereira (Wikipedia), and includes debates on collective testimony (Journal of Social Ontology) and skepticism like the fake barn case (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Key resources like the Oxford Handbook introduced by Paul K. Moser (Wikipedia) and Companion to Epistemology edited by Dancy, Sosa, and Steup (Cambodian Education Forum) underscore its scope on justification, memory, and fallibilism.
openrouter/x-ai/grok-4.1-fast 85% confidence
Epistemology is a central field in philosophy, as evidenced by dedicated books like Richard A. Fumerton's 'Epistemology' published by Blackwell in 2006 Fumerton's Epistemology book and the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's comprehensive entry citing Fred Dretske's 1981 work SEP Epistemology entry. Peter Klein provides definitions and discussions of skepticism within epistemology, as in his Routledge Encyclopedia entry and 'A Companion to Epistemology' Klein defines epistemology, Klein on skepticism. Key debates include Willard Van Orman Quine's rejection of the reconstructive approach via the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Quine on reconstructive epistemology, the false credit thesis challenged in SEP credit thesis false, and distinctions in testimony justification between Humean-reductionist and Reidian-non-reductionist traditions per IEP Humean vs Reidian testimony. Virtue epistemology features prominently, with works like the Oxford collection edited by Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski intellectual virtue perspectives and critiques of Lorraine Code and James Montmarquet Code and Montmarquet views. Broader integrations appear in 'Global Epistemologies and Philosophies of Science' incorporating standpoint theory and decolonial studies global epistemologies book, while Plato laid foundational rationalist objective idealism encompassing epistemology Plato's objective idealism. Specific issues include machine testimony argued by Mitchell Green machine testimony argument and the regress problem per Carl Ginet infinitism regress critique. These facts from SEP, IEP, and academic presses highlight epistemology's focus on knowledge justification, sources like testimony and memory, and responses to skepticism.

Facts (297)

Sources
Epistemology - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org Wikipedia 64 facts
claimThe term 'epistemology' can refer to the specific philosophical positions held by individual philosophers, such as Plato's epistemology or Immanuel Kant's epistemology.
claimThe word 'epistemology' was coined in the 19th century to designate the field as a distinct branch of philosophy.
claimSome schools of epistemology consider non-perception, which leads to knowledge of absences, and presumption as sources of knowledge.
claimPsychology and cognitive sociology study the beliefs people actually have and how they acquire them, whereas epistemology examines the evaluative norms of these processes.
claimEpistemology intersects with fields such as decision theory, education, and anthropology.
claimStephen Phillips and Anand Vaidya authored the entry 'Epistemology in Classical Indian Philosophy' for The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, published by the Metaphysics Research Lab at Stanford University.
claimEpistemology includes a view that a belief is justified if it is formed through a reliable belief formation process, such as perception.
claimDecision theory and epistemology both investigate the foundations of rational thought and the role of beliefs, though decision theory focuses more on the practical side of how beliefs are translated into action.
claimParticularists in epistemology begin their inquiry by examining specific cases and using intuitions about concrete instances and thought experiments as methodological constraints for general theories.
referenceAvrum Stroll authored 'Epistemology' in 2023, published in 'Encyclopædia Britannica'.
claimThe internalist-externalist debate in epistemology is distinct from the internalism-externalism debate in the philosophy of mind, which concerns whether mental states depend solely on the individual or also on their environment.
claimArtificial intelligence utilizes insights from epistemology and cognitive science to implement solutions for problems related to knowledge representation and automatic reasoning.
claimInferential knowledge in epistemology arises when a person reasons from one known fact to another, such as inferring that it rained based on the observation that the streets are wet.
claimG. E. Moore placed common sense at the center of his epistemology.
claimEpistemologists study the concepts of belief, truth, and justification to understand the nature of knowledge.
claimPsychology describes what beliefs people have and how they acquire them, whereas the focus of epistemology is on evaluating beliefs to judge whether they are justified and rational.
claimThe term 'epistemology' was used as early as 1847 in New York's Eclectic Magazine.
claimStephen Phillips authored the entry 'Epistemology, Indian Schools of' for the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
claimBuddhist philosophers relied on concepts developed in Nyaya and other traditions when they became interested in epistemology.
claimEducation focuses on the transmission of knowledge and the roles of the learner and teacher, whereas epistemology focuses on the nature of knowledge itself.
claimReliabilism, developed by philosophers such as Alvin Goldman, asserts that knowledge requires reliable sources and shifts the focus of epistemology away from justification.
claimJohn Greco authored the entry "Epistemology" for the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy in 2021.
claimThe term 'gnoseology' is occasionally used as a synonym for epistemology.
claimEpistemology explores three types of knowledge: propositional knowledge about facts, practical knowledge in the form of skills, and knowledge by acquaintance as a familiarity through experience.
claimEpistemology is also known as the theory of knowledge.
claimThe central concepts in epistemology include belief, truth, evidence, and reason.
claimEpistemologists may rely on insights from empirical sciences when formulating normative theories, despite the contrast between normative and descriptive disciplines.
claimThe term 'epistemology' was first employed as a label for a branch of philosophy by James Frederick Ferrier in 1854.
claimKnowledge ascription is the act of attributing knowledge to someone in epistemology.
claimEpistemology and psychology were not defined as distinct fields until the 19th century.
referencePaul K. Moser wrote the introduction to 'The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology', published by Oxford University Press in 2005.
claimThe ethics of belief is a field exploring the intersection of epistemology and ethics, examining the norms governing belief formation and whether violating these norms is morally wrong.
claimGregory R. Wheeler and Luís Moniz Pereira authored the article 'Epistemology and Artificial Intelligence', published in the Journal of Applied Logic in 2004.
claimJonathan O. Chimakonam and L. Uchenna Ogbonnaya authored the chapter 'Toward an African Theory of Knowledge' in the 2021 book 'African Metaphysics, Epistemology and a New Logic: A Decolonial Approach to Philosophy', published by Palgrave Macmillan.
claimIn epistemology, beliefs are often understood as subjective attitudes that affirm or deny a proposition, which can be expressed in a declarative sentence.
claimJean-François Lyotard and Michel Foucault are considered influential theorists in the field of epistemology.
referenceKevin Kelly authored the chapter 'Learning Theory and Epistemology' in the 'Handbook of Epistemology', published by Springer in 2004.
referenceOxford University Press published an entry on 'Epistemology' in the Oxford English Dictionary in 2024.
referenceFrederick F. Schmitt authored the chapter 'Epistemology and Cognitive Science' in the 'Handbook of Epistemology', published by Springer in 2004.
referenceTristram McPherson authored the book 'Epistemology and Methodology in Ethics', published by Cambridge University Press in 2020.
claimEpistemology includes pragmatist, semantic, pluralist, and deflationary theories of truth.
claimMetaepistemological insights can have various indirect effects on disputes within the field of epistemology.
claimEpistemology is a main branch of philosophy, alongside ethics, logic, and metaphysics.
claimThe trilemma in epistemology distinguishes three methods for providing reasons for a statement: finding a justification that requires no further reason, using circular reasoning by repeating a previously stated justification, or providing an infinite chain of justification.
claimEpistemology explores how people should acquire beliefs and evaluates which beliefs or forms of belief acquisition meet the standards or epistemic goals of knowledge.
referenceVincent Shen authored the entry 'Chinese Philosophy: Metaphysics and Epistemology' in the 'Encyclopedia of Philosophy', published by Macmillan in 2006.
claimEpistemology is a normative discipline, whereas psychology and cognitive sociology are descriptive disciplines.
referenceEric Schwitzgebel authored the chapter 'Belief' in 'The Routledge Companion to Epistemology', published by Routledge in 2011.
referenceRichard A. Fumerton authored the book 'Epistemology', published by Blackwell in 2006.
claimIn epistemology, justification is defined as a property of beliefs that adhere to specific norms regarding what a person should believe.
claimEpistemology is closely related to psychology, which infers the beliefs people hold from their words and actions, while epistemology studies the norms governing the evaluation of beliefs.
claimEpistemology is the branch of philosophy that examines the nature, origin, and limits of knowledge.
claimTruth functions as a goal of cognitive processes and an attribute of propositional knowledge within epistemology.
claimThe term 'epistemology' is derived from the Greek words 'episteme,' meaning 'knowledge,' and 'logos,' meaning 'study' or 'science.'
claimEpistemology explores the principles of how various disciplines, including other branches of philosophy and the sciences, may arrive at knowledge.
claimEpistemology distinguishes between a posteriori knowledge and a priori knowledge.
referenceMatthias Steup and Ram Neta authored 'Epistemology' in 2024, published in 'The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy' by the Metaphysics Research Lab at Stanford University.
claimEpistemology addresses the extent and limits of knowledge, specifically focusing on what people can and cannot know.
claimA common view in epistemology holds that a person has a justified belief if they possess sufficient reasons or supporting information for that belief.
claimMetaepistemology functions as a metatheory that examines the fundamental concepts, background assumptions, goals, and research methods of epistemology rather than advocating for specific epistemological theories.
claimEpistemology shares a close connection with cognitive science, which defines mental events as processes that transform information.
referenceMark Kaplan authored the chapter 'Decision Theory and Epistemology' in 'The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology', published by Oxford University Press in 2005.
claimIn epistemology, the terms 'reasonable', 'warranted', and 'supported' are sometimes used as synonyms for the term 'justified'.
claimEpistemology primarily focuses on propositional knowledge, though some theorists prioritize understanding.
Understanding epistemology and its key approaches in research cefcambodia.com Koemhong Sol, Kimkong Heng · Cambodian Education Forum Jan 21, 2023 27 facts
claimThe epistemology of pragmatism defines knowledge as a self-correcting, fallible process based on experience that must be evaluated and revised in view of subsequent experience.
referenceLuper, S. (2010) discusses knowledge in the entry 'Epistemology from A to Z' within 'A Companion to Epistemology'.
referenceRescher, N. (2003) authored 'Epistemology: An introduction to the theory of knowledge'.
claimPotter (2017) defines epistemology as the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature of knowledge, its possibility, scope, and general basis.
referenceThe book 'A companion to epistemology' (2nd Edition), edited by J. Dancy, E. Sosa, and M. Steup and published by Blackwell Publishing, contains information on epistemology on pages 520-524.
referenceMatthias Steup authored the entry 'Epistemology from A to Z [Justification]' in the book 'A companion to epistemology' (2nd Edition), published by Blackwell Publishing in 2010.
referenceSenor, T. (2010) discusses memory in the entry 'Epistemology from A to Z' within 'A Companion to Epistemology'.
quoteEdelheim (2014) states that ontology, epistemology, and axiology 'lay the foundations for how we, as individuals, understand the world we live in, the determinations we make about issues relating to truth, and the matters we consider to be of value to us individually, and to society at large'.
referenceThe Oxford English Dictionary defines epistemology as the theory of knowledge and understanding, especially with regard to its methods, validity, and scope, and the distinction between justified belief and opinion.
claimMerriam and Tisdell (2016) define epistemology as the nature of knowledge and its construction.
claimEpistemology is a field of philosophy concerned with questions about what knowledge is, the sources of knowledge, the extent to which we know things, and the differences between knowledge, wisdom, and opinion.
referenceEdelheim (2014) defines epistemology as the study of knowledge, which sets out to explain why society jointly decides that certain things are true and others are not.
claimPotter (2017) distinguishes between ontology and epistemology by stating that ontology is concerned with what exists and in what form, while epistemology is concerned with how humans can come to know and understand those things.
claimKillam (2013) asserts that epistemology deals with the nature or theory of knowledge and is concerned with how knowledge is acquired or how we know what we know.
referenceCrotty (1998) defines epistemology as the theory of knowledge embedded in the theoretical perspective and thereby in the methodology.
claimCouper (2020) defines epistemology as the study of knowledge, which asks questions such as 'what is knowledge?' and 'how do we know something?'
referencePotter, W. J. (2017) authored an entry on epistemology in 'The international encyclopedia of communication research methods'.
referenceLeite, A. (2010) discusses fallibilism in the entry 'Epistemology from A to Z' within 'A Companion to Epistemology'.
claimBryman (2012) defines epistemology as a stance on what should pass as acceptable knowledge.
claimSteup and Neta (2020) assert that while the term 'epistemology' is only a couple of centuries old, the field of philosophy it represents is at least as old as any other philosophy.
claimKlein (2005) views epistemology as one of the core areas of philosophy because it deals with the nature of human knowledge.
claimEpistemology is a branch of philosophy that examines the relationship between knowledge and the researcher during the process of discovery.
referenceKlein, P. D. (2010) discusses skepticism in the entry 'Epistemology from A to Z' within 'A Companion to Epistemology'.
claimEpistemology is a branch of philosophy that concerns itself with the theory of knowledge and the nature of knowledge.
claimThe article 'Understanding epistemology and its key approaches in research' identifies positivism, interpretivism, and pragmatism as key epistemological approaches central to research.
referenceKlein, P. (2005) defines epistemology in the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
referenceMoser (2009) defines epistemology as the study of the nature of knowledge and justification, specifically regarding defining components, substantive conditions or sources, and the limits of knowledge and justification.
Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Matthias Steup, Ram Neta · Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Dec 14, 2005 25 facts
claimMichael Beaton and Harry McCauley suggested improvements to the wording of sentences within the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Epistemology.
claimIn epistemology, 'J-factors' are defined as the specific factors that determine whether a belief is justified or unjustified.
claimEpistemology, when understood broadly, concerns issues related to the creation and dissemination of knowledge in specific areas of inquiry.
claimEpistemology as the study of knowledge addresses the necessary and sufficient conditions of knowledge, its sources, its structure, and its limits.
claimIn epistemology, an alternative to a proposition or state of affairs 'p' is defined as any proposition or state of affairs that is incompatible with 'p'.
claimReliabilism is a view in epistemology which asserts that a belief is justified if and only if it originates in reliable cognitive processes or faculties.
claimEpistemology is defined narrowly as the study of knowledge and justified belief.
claimMentalism is a principle characteristic of the internalist point of view in epistemology, which states that if two subjects are alike mentally, then the justificational status of their beliefs is alike as well.
claimPeter Klein argued in his 2005 paper "Infinitism is the Solution to the Regress Problem" that infinitism resolves the regress problem in epistemology.
claimThe 'compromise position' in epistemology is characterized by four features: it allows for doxastic basicality; it does not allow for epistemic basicality; it is inconsistent with doxastic coherentism; and it qualifies as a version of coherentism known as dependence coherentism.
referenceThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Epistemology (2013) cites the following works regarding the theory of knowledge: Alston, William (1989, 1991, 1993, 1999); Armstrong, D.M. (1973); Axtell, Guy (1997); Audi, Robert (1993, 1997a, 1997b, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2004); Boghossian, Paul and Peacocke, Christopher (2000); BonJour, Laurence (1985, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2005); BonJour, Laurence and Sosa, Ernest (2003); Brady, Michael and Pritchard, Duncan (2003); Brewer, Bill (1999, 2005); Byrne, Alex (2005); Casullo, Albert (2003); and Chisholm, Roderick (1982).
claimEpistemology as the study of justified belief addresses the concept of justification, what makes beliefs justified, and whether justification is internal or external to the mind.
claimThe role of justification in epistemology is to ensure that a true belief is not true merely by accident, which is accomplished when a true belief instantiates the property of proper probabilification.
perspectiveThe dominant contemporary view in epistemology is that the deontological understanding of justification is unsuitable for the purposes of the field.
claimExperiential foundationalism is a theory in epistemology that posits perceptual experiences as a source of justification, which coherentists challenge by asking why perceptual experiences serve this function (the J-question).
claimAccording to the coherentist view of epistemology, perceptual experiences serve as a source of justification only if the individual has considered the matter and believes those experiences to be reliable.
claimThe received view in epistemology is that whatever is known a priori is necessarily true, though some epistemologists disagree with this position.
claimThe 'compromise position' in epistemology asserts that for perceptual experiences to serve as a source of justification, an individual must possess justification for believing those experiences are reliable, rather than necessarily having considered and formed a belief about their reliability.
claimMany epistemologists argue that the conjunction of knowing one has hands while not knowing one is not a Brain in a Vat (BIV) is abominable because it violates the intuition that one cannot know they have hands without knowing they are not a BIV.
claimIn epistemology, the term 'justification' is often used in a technical sense that deviates from ordinary usage to better suit the needs of the field.
claimIn contemporary epistemology, there is an ongoing debate between internalists and externalists regarding whether justification is internal or external.
claimThe 'compromise position' in epistemology attempts to bridge foundationalism and coherentism by arguing that perceptual experiences are a source of justification because a subject has justification for taking those experiences to be reliable, without requiring the subject to hold a belief that attributes reliability to those experiences.
claimEpistemologists distinguish between 'remembering that p,' which entails the truth of the proposition p, and 'seeming to remember that p,' which does not entail the truth of p.
claimCarl Ginet argued in his 2005 paper "Infinitism is not the Solution to the Regress Problem" that infinitism does not resolve the regress problem in epistemology.
claimContextualists in epistemology distinguish between two sets of standards for knowledge, referred to as 'high' and 'low' standards, which determine how liberally or reluctantly knowledge is ascribed in different contexts.
Naturalized Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Jul 5, 2001 18 facts
claimWidely shared views in epistemology imply that for a person to know a proposition to be true, the person must have a well-justified belief in the proposition, and the proposition must in fact be true.
claimThe relevance of empirical work in psychology and biology to epistemology depends on whether epistemology is defined broadly as the study of human knowledge or narrowly as the study of specifically philosophical questions about knowledge.
claimNaturalists in epistemology tend to focus on questions regarding whether we have knowledge in specific areas, whether we draw correct conclusions from evidence, and whether the processes we use are reliable.
claimTraditionalists in epistemology can sensibly proceed without scientific input if their goal is to refute arguments for skepticism, as refuting arguments for the denial of knowledge does not necessarily demonstrate that knowledge exists.
claimCooperative Naturalism, when interpreted as the view that detailed information from empirical sciences is important for epistemology, is likely to be rejected by armchair epistemologists.
claimMany epistemologists investigate accounts of the epistemic support relation that allow for beliefs to be well-supported by sensory evidence even if they are not strictly derivable from that evidence.
claimNaturalists in epistemology attempt to provide naturalistic definitions for epistemic terms, which are defined as statements of logically necessary and sufficient conditions for the application of those terms.
quoteEpistemology, or something like it, simply falls into place as a chapter of psychology and hence of natural science. It studies a natural phenomenon, viz., a physical human subject. This human subject is accorded a certain experimentally controlled input -- certain patterns of irradiation in assorted frequencies, for instance -- and in the fullness of time the subject delivers as output a description of the three-dimensional external world and its history. The relation between the meager input and the torrential output is a relation that we are prompted to study for somewhat the same reasons that always prompted epistemology: namely, in order to see how evidence relates to theory, and in what ways one's theory of nature transcends any available evidence...But a conspicuous difference between old epistemology and the epistemological enterprise in this new psychological setting is that we can now make free use of empirical psychology.
claimPhilosophers including Alvin Goldman (1992), Stephen Stich and Richard Nisbett (1980), Gilbert Harman (1986), and Hilary Kornblith (1994) have expressed sentiments similar to Susan Haack regarding the relevance of empirical results to epistemology.
claimW.V.O. Quine viewed the central question of epistemology as whether our actual scientific beliefs have a firm foundation, with the goal of reconstructing our knowledge.
claimCooperative Naturalism is a philosophical view which holds that while evaluative questions exist in epistemology, empirical results from psychology concerning how humans think and reason are essential or useful for making progress in addressing those questions.
perspectiveW.V.O. Quine concludes that the traditional effort to respond to skepticism is a failure and suggests that the failure of foundationalism implies that epistemology is impossible.
claimScientific epistemologists assert that results from empirical studies are valuable or necessary for the field of epistemology.
quoteW.V.O. Quine begins his essay 'Epistemology Naturalized' by stating that 'Epistemology is concerned with the foundations of science.'
claimWillard Van Orman Quine's later views on epistemology were more moderate than his earlier positions, as indicated in his 1990 work.
claimTraditionalists in epistemology often regard epistemic support facts as necessary truths, and this necessity allows evidentialists to endorse the supervenience thesis.
claimWillard Van Orman Quine proposed that epistemology should be treated as a chapter of psychology and natural science, focusing on the psychological processes that transform sensory stimulations into beliefs about the world.
claimThe Quinean view that epistemology should be abandoned in favor of psychology is not widely accepted by contemporary naturalists in epistemology, as noted by Almeder (1998), BonJour (1994), Foley (1994), and Fumerton (1994).
Epistemology | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy iep.utm.edu Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy 18 facts
claimInternalism is an epistemological view maintaining that the justification of a belief depends solely on factors internal to the believer's mind, such as their thought processes during the belief's formation.
claimEpistemology is defined as the study of knowledge.
claimEpistemology assumes the existence of objective truth, which allows for the possibility that beliefs can either match or fail to match reality.
claimThe regress argument in epistemology posits that there are two kinds of justified beliefs: basic beliefs, which begin a series of justified beliefs, and non-basic beliefs, which are based on other justified beliefs.
claimEpistemology is defined as the study of knowledge.
claimEpistemology assumes that knowledge is factive, meaning that for someone to know something, there must be a fact of the matter to be known.
claimThe study of epistemology includes meta-epistemology, which is the study of what can be known about knowledge itself, with the goal of determining the criteria for knowledge.
claimThe regress problem in epistemology identifies three potential structures for justified beliefs: the series of justified beliefs continues infinitely, the series of justified beliefs circles back to its beginning, or the series of justified beliefs begins with an unjustified belief.
claimEpistemologists typically define knowledge by seeking a set of individually necessary and jointly sufficient conditions that determine whether a person knows a proposition.
claimSocial epistemology is a subfield of epistemology that addresses how groups, institutions, or other collective bodies acquire knowledge.
claimIn epistemology, a belief must be both true and justified to constitute knowledge.
claimThe 'regress problem' in epistemology arises from the requirement that a justified belief must be based on another justified belief, potentially leading to an infinite chain of justification.
claimThe 'generality problem' in epistemology posits that because cognitive processes can be described at various levels of generality, it is difficult to determine whether a specific process is reliable or unreliable, making it impossible to know if a belief is justified without knowing the appropriate level of generality to use.
claimEpistemology is the study of knowledge and involves evaluating knowledge claims to determine whether they indeed constitute knowledge, which requires understanding what knowledge is and how much knowledge is possible.
claimExternalism is the epistemological view that factors external to a believer's mind determine whether that believer is justified.
claimFallibilism is the epistemological view that it is possible to possess knowledge even when a true belief might have turned out to be false.
claimEpistemology includes the study of meta-epistemology, which is the study of what can be known about knowledge itself.
claimThe term 'epistemology' is derived from the Greek words 'episteme,' meaning 'knowledge,' and 'logos,' meaning 'study' or 'science.'
Naturalistic Epistemology | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy iep.utm.edu Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy 17 facts
claimMany philosophers consider answering the Cartesian skeptic to be a primary task of epistemology, as the Cartesian skeptic argues that knowledge is impossible because the possibility of massive deception cannot be ruled out.
claimAlvin Goldman defines his naturalism as the view that epistemology 'needs help' from science.
claimThe reconstructive approach to epistemology aims to model epistemology on the foundations of mathematics by translating theoretical vocabulary into sensory terms.
perspectiveThomas Kuhn believes that the social sciences should be applied to epistemology.
perspectiveAlvin Goldman's approach to epistemology differs from W.V.O. Quine's because Goldman does not view epistemology as a part of science, but rather as a field that requires both a priori philosophy and the application of scientific results.
claimW.V. Quine assumes that the main problem of epistemology is to explain the relationship between theories and their observational evidence.
perspectiveWillard Van Orman Quine concludes that because confirmation holism prevents the reconstruction of theoretical vocabulary in observational terms, the only remaining method for epistemology is the psychological method, which involves empirically studying how humans transform sensory input into theoretical output.
claimW.V.O. Quine's conception of the relationship between science and epistemology contrasts with the traditional view of epistemology as the 'queen of the sciences.'
claimThe debate between internalists and externalists in epistemology concerns whether factors other than mental states contribute to the justification of beliefs.
referenceAlvin Goldman published "Epistemology and Cognition" in 1986 through Harvard University Press, exploring the intersection of epistemology and cognitive science.
claimNaturalistic epistemology lacks a single, standard approach because different naturalists hold varying views regarding the relationship between science and epistemology.
claimIn the essay 'Epistemology Naturalized,' W.V. Quine argues for conceiving epistemology as a 'chapter of psychology,' and for seeing epistemology and empirical science as containing and constraining one another.
claimW.V.O. Quine argues that naturalistic epistemology and the rest of science are mutually constraining because they contain one another, with science forming part of epistemology's subject matter.
perspectiveAlvin Goldman believes epistemology needs aid from the empirical sciences.
perspectiveWillard Van Orman Quine argues that the reconstructive approach to epistemology, which attempts to translate theoretical vocabulary into sensory terms, cannot succeed.
claimW.V.O. Quine's naturalistic epistemology posits that epistemology is contained within psychology as a subdiscipline.
perspectiveW.V. Quine regards epistemology as a chapter of psychology.
Virtue Epistemology | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy iep.utm.edu Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy 15 facts
claimThe author contends that any viable version of virtue responsibilism must demonstrate that there is a unified set of substantive philosophical issues connected to intellectual virtues and that these issues are the proper subject matter of epistemology rather than ethics.
referenceJames Montmarquet (1993) offers a virtue-based conception of epistemic justification that is aimed at illuminating moral responsibility rather than addressing the concerns that typically interest epistemologists.
perspectiveLorraine Code argues that epistemology should be oriented around the notion of epistemic responsibility, which she identifies as the chief intellectual virtue.
claimJonathan Kvanvig argues that the traditional framework of epistemology leaves little room for considerations of intellectual virtue and therefore should be abandoned.
claimLorraine Code's approach to epistemology focuses on cognitive character, the role of choice in intellectual flourishing, the relationship between moral and epistemic normativity, and the social and communal dimensions of intellectual life.
referenceJonathan Kvanvig (1992) provides a treatment of intellectual virtues that more effectively demonstrates substantive questions for epistemologists than the work of either Lorraine Code or James Montmarquet.
claimVirtue reliabilists and virtue responsibilists appear to be advocating two fundamentally different and perhaps opposing kinds of epistemology, with the former viewing cognitive faculties as central and the latter viewing traits of intellectual character as central.
claimVirtue reliabilist views in epistemology are likely to be unsatisfying to individuals with internalist sympathies because they prioritize externalist criteria over the internalist requirement for having an adequate reason for belief.
claimLorraine Code claims that an adequate conception of intellectual virtues cannot be achieved through standard methodologies of contemporary epistemology, which she believes are too narrow and overemphasize abstract doxastic properties like knowledge and justification.
perspectiveThe author of the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry argues that the questions identified by James Montmarquet regarding intellectual virtue are more appropriate for the subject matter of ethics than for epistemology.
claimThe Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy suggests that if Ernest Sosa's criticisms of traditional coherentist and foundationalist views and his positive proposal are plausible, virtue reliabilism can address significant problems in contemporary epistemology.
perspectiveThe author of the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry argues that while Lorraine Code identified an important insight about the value of intellectual virtues, this insight lacks the theoretical implications necessary to motivate an alternative approach to epistemology.
claimThe author argues that the views of Lorraine Code and James Montmarquet fail to meet the conditions of identifying a unified set of philosophical issues for intellectual virtues or establishing those issues as the proper subject matter of epistemology.
claimUnlike Lorraine Code, James Montmarquet does not advocate for a complete reorientation of epistemology based on intellectual virtues, as his focus is narrower.
claimVirtue epistemologists claim that virtue concepts deserve an important and fundamental role in epistemology.
What Is Epistemology? Pt. 3: The Nature of Justification and Belief philosimplicity.com Philosimplicity Oct 23, 2017 13 facts
claimFallibilism and skepticism in epistemology focus on the certainty of belief.
claimMost epistemologists conclude that known things cannot be false because knowledge requires that beliefs be both justified and true.
claimFoundherentism is an epistemological theory that attempts to reconcile foundationalism and coherentism by combining a set of beliefs that have an externally established foundation with internal relationships between those beliefs.
claimThe Internal-External (IE) debate is a major contemporary debate in epistemology concerning whether justification for beliefs comes from internal mental states or external conditions.
claimInternalism and externalism in epistemology focus on the sources of justification and belief.
claimCoherentism and foundationalism are rival theories in modern epistemology, and both aim to address the problem of infinite regress.
claimFoundationalism and coherentism in epistemology focus on the structure of justification and belief.
claimFoundationalism is an epistemological theory that focuses on the structure of justification rather than its source, asserting that self-evident axioms or basic beliefs are necessary to support other justifications and beliefs.
claimCoherentism is an epistemological theory that evaluates the validity of a belief or justification based on how well it relates to and validates other beliefs and justifications.
claimEpistemological positions are not mutually exclusive; for example, an individual can be an externalist regarding knowledge while being an internalist regarding justification, or simultaneously a fallibilist and a foundationalist.
claimInfinitism is an epistemological theory that accepts the idea that all justifications require further justifications, effectively rejecting the infinite regress constraints of both coherentism and foundationalism.
claimInternalists in epistemology only accept internal justifications for beliefs.
claimFoundationalism is an epistemological theory structured as a hierarchy, where basic beliefs that are considered untouchable or foundational sit at the bottom.
Epistemology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Fall 2019 Edition) plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Dec 14, 2005 10 facts
referenceThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Epistemology (Fall 2019 Edition) cites Fred Dretske's 1970 article 'Epistemic Operators' published in The Journal of Philosophy, 67: 1007–23.
claimThe principle of Mentalism in epistemology states that if two subjects are mentally alike, then the justificational status of their beliefs is also alike.
claimEpistemology is defined narrowly as the study of knowledge and justified belief, and broadly as the study of issues concerning the creation and dissemination of knowledge in particular areas of inquiry.
referenceThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Epistemology (Fall 2019 Edition) cites Keith DeRose's 1995 article 'Solving the Skeptical Problem' published in The Philosophical Review, 104: 1–52.
referenceThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Epistemology (Fall 2019 Edition) cites Catherine Elgin's 1996 book 'Considered Judgement' published by Princeton University Press.
referenceThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Epistemology (Fall 2019 Edition) cites Jonathan Kvanvig's 1996 work 'The Intellectual Virtues and the Life of the Mind', published by Rowman and Littlefield.
referenceThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Epistemology (Fall 2019 Edition) cites Jonathan Kvanvig's 1996 work 'Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology: Essays in Honor of Plantinga's Theory of Knowledge', published by Rowman and Littlefield.
referenceThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Epistemology (Fall 2019 Edition) cites Richard Feldman's 1988 article 'Epistemic Obligations' published in Philosophical Perspectives, 2: 235–56.
referenceThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Epistemology (Fall 2019 Edition) cites Fred Dretske's 1981 book 'Knowledge and the Flow of Information' published by Blackwell.
claimEpistemology defines knowledge as requiring truth and objective reality.
Epistemological Problems of Testimony plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Apr 1, 2021 9 facts
claimEpistemologists generally agree that it is possible to learn from the testimony of others, although explaining the mechanism of this learning process remains a difficult task.
referenceGoldberg (2009) discusses how expert testimony influences the semantics of technical terms, linking epistemology and the philosophy of language.
referenceNicholas Wolterstorff authored the book 'Thomas Reid and the Story of Epistemology', which was published by Cambridge University Press in 2001.
referenceThomas Reid's 'Inquiry and Essays' (1983) explores epistemological themes, edited by Ronald E. Beanblossom and Keith Lehrer.
claimDebates regarding the transmission of knowledge in epistemology are connected to the Inheritance View and the debate between Individualism and Non-Individualism.
claimNon-Reductionism in epistemology traces back to the work of Thomas Reid (1983).
claimThe 'Second Big Question' in epistemology asks whether testimony can generate knowledge or merely transmit it, specifically whether a hearer can acquire knowledge from a speaker who does not know the proposition themselves.
referenceAlvin I. Goldman argued in 1999 that epistemology must be understood within a social context, as detailed in his book 'Knowledge in a Social World'.
claimCharlie Pelling's 2013 article 'Testimony, Testimonial Belief, and Safety' examines the relationship between testimony, testimonial belief, and the concept of safety in epistemology.
Epistemology of Testimony | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy iep.utm.edu Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy 9 facts
claimEpistemology involves assigning statuses such as 'knowledge' or 'justification' to beliefs based on whether those beliefs meet specific epistemic standards.
claimThe basis of a belief is defined as its source or root, and categorizing beliefs by their origin is a fundamental approach in epistemology.
perspectiveSome epistemologists argue that a speaker with low stakes and sufficient certainty for their own purposes has the right to assert a proposition regardless of the audience's stakes, such as when posting on the internet.
claimMichael Dummett (1994) suggests that knowledge-preservationism aligns best with a less demanding approach to epistemology by drawing a strong analogy between testimony and memory.
perspectiveConservatives in epistemology argue that transforming testimony into perception is not epistemically innocent because anthropomorphizing sense faculties introduces human agency, while treating a testifier as a perceptual device removes it.
claimSome epistemologists are skeptical of the 'fake barn case,' arguing that these cases do not clearly demonstrate a failure of justification or knowledge.
claimIn the context of epistemology, testimony is not limited to formal courtroom testimony but encompasses any instance where one person communicates information to another person.
claimMitchell Green argues that machine testimony should be considered genuine testimony because if two beliefs have the same epistemic status, content, cognitive ability, and phenomenology, they should be categorized similarly by epistemologists.
claimThe Humean-reductionist tradition in epistemology views testimonially-based justification as having strong disanalogies to perceptually-based justification, whereas the Reidian-non-reductionist tradition views the two sources as having a strong analogy.
Virtue Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Jul 9, 1999 8 facts
claimMark Alfano (2015), Heather Battaly (2014), and Quassim Cassam (2016) argue that epistemology should examine intellectual vices and defects to provide cautionary examples of behavior.
claimContemporary virtue epistemology is a diverse collection of approaches to the field of epistemology.
claimLinda Zagzebski (1996) argues that an epistemological theory should be practically useful in helping individuals recognize when they do or do not know something.
claimMiranda Fricker (2007) argues that epistemology should help individuals appreciate and respond to forms of epistemic injustice.
claimA complete epistemology likely requires both faculty-virtues, which account for knowledge of the past and the world, and trait-virtues, which are necessary for deeper intellectual achievements like understanding and wisdom.
claimThe credit thesis in epistemology is false because the origin of a belief, such as natural selection or an evolutionary mechanism, is often the most salient explanation for why a subject holds a true belief, making it unlikely the subject deserves credit for that knowledge.
claimJohn McDowell (1994) and Duncan Pritchard (2016) argue that epistemology should help individuals overcome anxieties caused by defective presuppositions about knowledge.
claimRoberts and Wood (2007) argue that epistemology should inspire individuals with portraits of intellectual virtues to promote cultural reformation and intellectual flourishing.
Epistemic Justification – Introduction to Philosophy: Epistemology press.rebus.community Todd R. Long · Rebus Community 7 facts
claimEpistemologists use the terms 'internalist' and 'externalist' to distinguish whether a theory requires a person to cognitively access or be aware of the factors that make their belief justified; theories requiring such access are 'internalist,' while those that do not are 'externalist.'
claimThe view that justification does not entail truth is a position in epistemology.
claimExternalists in epistemology believe that the factors determining epistemic justification are settled by a combination of a person's mental states and factors outside the person's mind.
referenceRichard Feldman authored 'Epistemology' (Chapters 4–5), published by Prentice Hall in 2003.
claimSome epistemologists include a no-defeaters clause in their justification theories, which asserts that for a person’s belief to be justified, there must be no justification defeaters present for that belief.
claimInternalists in epistemology believe that the factors determining epistemic justification depend entirely on what is occurring inside a person's mind.
claimEpistemology recognizes three stances on the truth value of a proposition: belief, disbelief, or suspension of judgment.
Virtue epistemology - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org Wikipedia 6 facts
claimVirtue epistemology differs from other areas of epistemology by taking the state of an individual's intellect into account, which allows social context to alter knowledge.
perspectiveJonathan Kvanvig believes that epistemology should focus on 'understanding,' which he maintains is of more value than knowledge or justified true belief.
perspectiveIn the essay 'Why Should Inquiring Minds Want to Know?: Meno Problems and Epistemological Axiology', Jonathan Kvanvig asserts that epistemology has no place in philosophical study.
claimVirtue epistemology is a philosophical approach to epistemology that emphasizes the importance of intellectual and epistemic virtues.
claimVirtue epistemology attempts to solve problems in modern epistemology, such as justification and reliabilism, by focusing on the knower as an agent, similar to how virtue ethics focuses on moral agents.
claimAI epistemology is a field that explores how artificial intelligence systems generate, structure, and transform knowledge, building on the foundations of virtue and social epistemology.
Naturalized epistemology - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org Wikipedia 5 facts
quoteHacker stated: "in effect the abandonment of epistemology in favour of a millennial neurophysiological learning theory that would explain in purely causal terms how the irritation of our surfaces by radiation and impact ultimately results in our theories of the world".
claimCooperative naturalism is a philosophical view that holds that empirical results from the natural sciences are essential and useful to epistemology, asserting that traditional epistemology cannot succeed in its investigation of knowledge without these results.
claimW.V.O. Quine argues that concerns regarding the circularity of using scientific criteria to evaluate scientific evidence are merely a byproduct of traditional epistemology.
claimCooperative naturalism is a version of naturalized epistemology that asserts that empirical results from psychology regarding human reasoning are essential for addressing evaluative questions in epistemology.
claimNaturalized epistemology shifts the focus of epistemology away from traditional philosophical questions and towards the empirical processes of knowledge acquisition.
Virtue Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu John Greco, John Turri · Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Jul 9, 1999 5 facts
referenceJason S. Baehr explores the role of character in epistemology in his 2006 paper 'Character in Epistemology', published in Philosophical Studies, 128(3): 479–514.
referenceDeborah L. Black examines certitude, justification, and knowledge principles in Avicenna's epistemology in her 2013 chapter 'Certitude, justification, and the principles of knowledge in Avicenna’s epistemology', published in 'Interpreting Avicenna' by Cambridge University Press.
claimContextualism is a view in epistemology that asserts the truth conditions for knowledge attributions like "S knows that P" are context-sensitive due to the nature of the verb "know."
referenceJohn Turri authored the article 'A new paradigm for epistemology: from reliabilism to abilism', published in the journal Ergo in 2016.
referenceThe book 'Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology', edited by Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski and published in 2003 by Oxford University Press, is a collection of works regarding virtue epistemology.
7.1 What Epistemology Studies - Introduction to Philosophy | OpenStax openstax.org OpenStax Jun 15, 2022 4 facts
claimConceptual analysis is a core method in philosophy and epistemology, involving the active search for counterexamples to proposed definitions.
claimEpistemology relies on argumentation, which is defined as the process of offering reasons in support of a conclusion.
claimIn epistemology, counterexamples typically take the form of hypothetical cases or thought experiments designed to show that a definition includes features that are either not necessary or not sufficient for the concept.
claimEpistemology is defined as the study of knowledge, focusing on what knowledge is, the types of knowledge that exist, the possibility and nature of justification, the sources of beliefs, and the nature of truth.
The Epistemology of Collective Testimony - Journal of Social Ontology journalofsocialontology.org Journal of Social Ontology Mar 1, 2022 4 facts
claimThe second view of collective testimony epistemology denies a necessary connection to belief, asserting instead that the epistemic credentials of collective testimony derive from the reliability or truth-conduciveness of the statement that expresses the testimony.
claimThe first view of collective testimony epistemology posits that collective testimony derives its epistemic credentials from the beliefs expressed by the testimony, which can be interpreted as the beliefs of all or some of the group's members, or as the beliefs of the group itself.
perspectiveThe author of 'The Epistemology of Collective Testimony' argues that the account of collective testimony based on a collective commitment to trustworthiness holds the most promise for preserving the distinctiveness of testimonial knowledge while underwriting a robust epistemology of collective testimony.
claimThe third view of collective testimony epistemology claims that the epistemic credentials of collective testimony derive from the group undertaking a collective commitment to trustworthiness, which makes the group susceptible to rebuke and blame if its testimony is not trustworthy.
The cross-cultural study of mind and behaviour: a word of caution link.springer.com Springer Apr 8, 2022 4 facts
claimThe author observes that epistemology (ways of knowing) transitions into ontology (ways of being) when researchers adopt the 'native's point of view'.
claimEpistemological concerns in cross-cultural studies, historically labeled as 'butterfly collecting' in anthropology, question what kind of general theoretical knowledge is produced when adding culturally determined ways of knowing to research.
claimAnthropological research is fundamentally epistemological rather than ontological, meaning it is concerned with ways of knowing and behaving in the world rather than with the nature of the world itself.
claimThe author of the article 'The cross-cultural study of mind and behaviour: a word of caution' classifies theoretical concerns regarding cross-cultural studies into three categories: epistemological, ontological, and ethical.
Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Feb 26, 2001 3 facts
claimReductionism in epistemology is the view that the justification of beliefs derived from testimony can be reduced to justifications provided by other sources such as perception, memory, and induction.
referenceMaura Priest's 2021 article 'How vice can motivate distrust in elites and trust in fake news' analyzes the psychological and epistemic mechanisms behind the acceptance of misinformation.
claimSocial epistemology is a field of study that investigates the epistemic effects of social interactions, practices, norms, and systems, aiming to redress the traditional individualistic focus of epistemology.
Virtue Epistemology, Anyone? - The Philosophers' Magazine - philosophersmag.com The Philosopher's Magazine 3 facts
claimVirtue epistemology is defined by two shared commitments: first, that epistemology is a normative discipline, and second, that intellectual agents and communities are the primary source of epistemic value and the primary focus of epistemic evaluation.
claimLinda Zagzebski posits that intellectual virtues are a subset of moral virtues, which implies that epistemology is a branch of ethics.
claimVirtue epistemologists oppose W.V.O. Quine's suggestion that epistemology should be a branch of psychology that is descriptive rather than prescriptive.
The Hard Problem of Consciousness | Springer Nature Link link.springer.com Springer 2 facts
claimRené Descartes and John Locke lumped sensory and intellectual contents of inner experience together, creating the modern use of the term 'idea' as an inner representation before the mind's eye, which made epistemology the central question of modern philosophy.
claimThe mind-body problem became the central question of epistemology and modern philosophy due to the problematization of the mind and its relation to reality by René Descartes, John Locke, George Berkeley, David Hume, and Immanuel Kant.
Consciousness, Attention, and Conscious Attention - Amazon.com amazon.com Carlos Montemayor, Harry Haladjian · MIT Press 2 facts
claimThe author of 'Consciousness, Attention, and Conscious Attention' is a Professor of Philosophy at San Francisco State University whose research focuses on the intersection between philosophy of mind, epistemology, and cognitive science.
claimThe research of the author of 'Consciousness, Attention, and Conscious Attention' focuses on the intersection between the philosophy of mind, epistemology, and cognitive science.
Rationalism Vs. Empiricism 101: Which One is Right? - TheCollector thecollector.com The Collector Nov 9, 2023 2 facts
claimPlato is considered the founder of ancient rationalism because he developed a comprehensive system of rationalism that addressed the sources, objects, criteria, possibilities, and scope of knowledge.
claimPlato established a rationalist-founded objective idealism, which served as the framework for his metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics.
Self-Consciousness - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Jul 13, 2017 2 facts
referenceJonardon Ganeri authored the book 'The Concealed Art of the Soul: Theories of Self and Practices of Truth in Indian Ethics and Epistemology', published by Oxford University Press in 2012.
claimDuring the early modern period, self-consciousness became a central topic in epistemology and the philosophy of mind, particularly through the work of Immanuel Kant and the post-Kantians.
Moving Forward on the Problem of Consciousness - David Chalmers consc.net Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 facts
claimDavid Chalmers asserts that an adequate epistemology is necessary to develop a detailed theory of consciousness, similar to other areas of science.
claimDavid Chalmers argues that phenomenology alone cannot solve the hard problem of consciousness, as it remains neutral on ontological debates, though it is central to the epistemology of the hard problem because it defines what needs explaining.
Social Epistemology - Open Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science oecs.mit.edu MIT Press Jul 24, 2024 2 facts
claimEpistemology is defined as the study of knowledge and related phenomena, including attitudes like belief and trust, attributes like justification and reliability, and intellectual traits such as humility or arrogance.
claimEpistemologists generally agree that mere true belief does not qualify as knowledge, as illustrated by the example of a belief based on a coin toss that happens to be correct.
Social Epistemology – Introduction to Philosophy - Rebus Press press.rebus.community William D. Rowley · Rebus Community 2 facts
referenceDaniel Massey discusses traditional skeptical arguments in Chapter 4 of the volume 'Introduction to Philosophy: Epistemology'.
referenceWhite (2009) provides a discussion of the thermometer analogy in epistemology.
What is the main difference between Rationalism and Empiricism? byjus.com BYJU'S 1 fact
claimRationalism and Empiricism are both theories within epistemology, the branch of philosophy concerned with knowledge, and have historically been used as opposing concepts.
Unidentified flying object - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org Wikipedia 1 fact
claimThe study of temporarily or permanently non-knowable anomalous phenomena or perceived objects in flight is considered part of the philosophical subject of epistemology.
(PDF) Epistemology Naturalized and "Epistemology Naturalized academia.edu Midwest Studies in Philosophy 1 fact
referenceW.V. Quine published the essay 'Epistemology Naturalized' in the 1969 collection 'Ontological Relativity and Other Essays'.
Naturalized Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Kelly Becker · Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Jul 5, 2001 1 fact
claimNaturalized epistemology is defined as a cluster of views asserting that epistemology is closely connected to natural science.
Epistemology grokipedia.com Grokipedia 1 fact
claimScottish philosopher James Frederick Ferrier coined the term 'epistemology' in 1856 to designate the branch of philosophy that systematically examines knowledge and distinguishes it from ontology.
[PDF] Naturalized Epistemology - Digital Commons @ Trinity digitalcommons.trinity.edu Trinity University 1 fact
claimEpistemology collapses without residue into sciences such as biology and psychology.
David Ludwig (Wageningen University and Research): Publications ... philpeople.org PhilPeople 1 fact
referenceThe edited book 'Global Epistemologies and Philosophies of Science' (Routledge, 2021) brings together a global community of philosophers to develop new perspectives on epistemology and the philosophy of science by integrating frameworks from academic philosophy (such as standpoint theory, social epistemology, and feminist philosophy of science) with fields like decolonial studies, transdisciplinarity, and the global history of science.
The Problem of Hard and Easy Problems cambridge.org Cambridge University Press Mar 31, 2023 1 fact
claimTudor Baetu's research interests include the epistemology and metaphysics of causal-mechanistic explanations, the explanatory role of mathematical models and computer simulations, and methodological issues in experimental science.
Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Matthias Steup, Ram Neta · Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Dec 14, 2005 1 fact
claimA primary problem for the relevant alternatives approach is that labeling the Brain in a Vat alternative as irrelevant is considered ad hoc unless supported by a principled account of what makes an alternative relevant or irrelevant.