Perturbation resistance potential (PRP) is calculated as Eg – (Ee + Ei), representing the difference between allostatic load and resource availability.
McEwen and Wingfield (2003) established the allostatic load framework, but research assessing the relationship between animal energetics and hallmarks of allostatic load, such as circulating glucocorticoid levels, remains limited.
The congruity between the pathology-focused definitions and the energetic-quantity-focused definitions of allostatic load has not been assessed, despite the assumption that they are equivalent or not in conflict.
In the McEwen and Wingfield (2003) model, Type I allostatic overload occurs when allostatic load exceeds the energetic resources available in the environment.
High internal fat stores, including fatty acid levels, muscle glycogen, and leptin, indicate a high probability of surviving short-term allostatic overload.
Allostatic overload Type 2 occurs when allostatic load is chronically high but the animal is not in a negative energy balance, and in this state, an emergency life-history stage (ELHS) is not triggered.
Glucocorticoid concentrations rise from level A (homeostatic level) to level B (reactive scope) as conditions deteriorate, and to level C (allostatic overload) when conditions become extreme, which triggers facultative responses such as the Emergency Life History Stage (ELHS).
In the energetics-based framework for allostatic load, Type II allostatic overload occurs when allostatic load remains high without exceeding basal energy available, resulting in pathology associated with chronically elevated glucocorticoids.
Calculating allostatic load requires selecting an appropriate time interval to average energy expenditure, as moment-to-moment fluctuations should not trigger overload.
In the revised allostasis model, allostatic load is defined as an energetic quantity (Eload), but its importance is reduced because it is not always a primary determinant of the Perceived Resource Potential (PRP).
Perturbation-related costs (Eo) in the allostatic load framework are inherently unpredictable and include costs associated with injury, disease, unexpected wear-and-tear, habitat loss, habitat degradation, predation risk, and major weather events.
The Reactive Scope model, introduced by Romero et al. (2009), serves as a complementary framework to the allostatic load model.
George Koob and Michel Le Moal described allostatic load as "the cost or the price the body may have to pay for being forced to adapt to an adverse or deleterious physiological or physical situation."
In the energetics-based framework proposed by Bruce McEwen and John Wingfield (2003), allostatic load is calculated as the function: allostatic load = Ee (basal existence) + Ei (routine activity) + Eo (unpredictable perturbations).
Past acute perturbations may not contribute to allostatic load or the Predictive Reactive Scope (PRP), but they can be integrated into an animal's perception of risk and induce changes in feedback mechanisms that mediate future hormonal responses.
Glucocorticoids are implicated in processes related to energy balance, which determines responses to energetic demand (allostatic load) and influences subsequent physiology and behavior associated with coping.
Allostatic overload triggers an 'emergency life-history stage' (ELHS), which redirects an individual's physiology and behavior toward survival.
In the allostatic load model, 'Eo' represents the cost of responding to 'labile perturbation factors' (LPFs).
Following exposure to a labile perturbation factor (LPF), once allostatic load returns to normal levels, the mediator control system resets as if the acute event had not occurred.
High internal fat stores, including fatty acid levels, muscle glycogen, and leptin, indicate a high probability of surviving short-term allostatic overload. This cue is reliable when the perturbation is short-lived, fat is expendable, and a delayed response is likely to succeed, but it may increase error if fat stores are necessary for escape or if the loss of insulation incurs additional costs.
Research assessing the relationship between animal energetics and hallmarks of allostatic load, such as circulating glucocorticoid levels, is limited according to McEwen and Wingfield (2003).
Wingfield (2004) posits that fat acts as a buffer against allostatic overload by providing an energy source to supplement Eg (energy expenditure).
Allostatic load (Eload) is calculated as the sum of basal existence energy (Ee), routine metabolic rate (Ei), and energetic costs due to perturbation (Eo), expressed as the formula Eload = Ee + Ei + Eo.
The hypothesis that variation in allostatic load is correlated with mediators such as plasma glucocorticoid levels was tested in birds and tentatively rejected by Word et al. (2022).
Allostatic load is defined as an energetic quantity (Eload) that can be subdivided into three component parts: basal existence costs (Ee), routine costs (Ei), and perturbation-related costs (Eo).
The original model of allostasis predicted that blood glucocorticoid levels should change in correlation with allostatic load.
In the model of physiological stability, level A represents the homeostatic level of glucocorticoids, level B represents the reactive scope for a specific life-history stage, and level C represents the state of allostatic overload.
Glucocorticoid levels are predicted to change in parallel with allostatic load.
As allostatic overload (Eo) progresses, the overall allostatic load increases and the perturbation resistance potential (PRP) decreases.
The Potential Resource Pool (PRP) is determined in part by allostatic load.
Allostasis, defined as stability through change, is a theoretical framework that integrates the demands of predictable and unpredictable environments, known as allostatic load, according to an individual's condition.
Baseline glucocorticoid levels in blood tend to increase slowly as environmental conditions deteriorate, which increases allostatic load in Strategy 2.
The cost of surrendering a physical location includes losing fitness-related investments from the normal life-history stage and increasing the risk of damage from Type II/allostatic overload.
The Potential for Resource Procurement (PRP) is determined, in part, by allostatic load.
The Perceived Resource Potential (PRP) describes the gap between allostatic load (Eload) and resource availability (Ecr), and is proposed to correlate with glucocorticoid levels rather than allostatic load itself.
Baseline glucocorticoid levels in blood tend to increase slowly as environmental conditions deteriorate, thereby increasing allostatic load.
The cost of activating the Emergency Life History Stage (ELHS) includes surrendering fitness-related investments associated with a normal life-history stage and potentially increasing the risk of damage associated with Type II/allostatic overload.
Allostatic load indicates energetic requirements and is a reliable cue when resources are limited (allostatic load is close to Ecr, and Perturbation Resistance Potential is low), but it increases error when resources vastly exceed requirements (allostatic load is much less than Ecr, and Perturbation Resistance Potential is high).
Goymann and Wingfield (2004) argued that allostatic load and social status are linked, emphasizing that the costs of social status are significant.
Allostatic overload Type 1 occurs when an animal is in a negative energy balance, specifically when the sum of all types of allostatic load exceeds resource availability (Eg).
Romero and Wingfield (2016) noted that homeostatic overload and allostatic overload are related but not identical concepts.
The congruity between differing definitions of allostatic load has not been assessed, despite the general assumption that they are equivalent or not in conflict.
Biomedical literature commonly estimates allostatic load by generating a score based on metrics including blood pressure, human low density lipoprotein (HLDL) cholesterol, and glycosylated hemoglobin.
Perturbation resistance potential (PRP) is a quantity in the framework of allostasis that describes the difference between allostatic load and resource availability, calculated as Eg – (Ee + Ei), and reflects an individual's vulnerability to allostatic overload Type 1.
The framework of allostasis, allostatic load, and overload is defined as stability through change, attempting to combine homeostasis processes in day-to-day physiological and behavioral responses.
The PRP describes the gap between allostatic load and resource availability, and is proposed to correlate with glucocorticoid levels rather than allostatic load itself.
Word et al. (2022) suggest that the absence of a clear correlation between allostatic load and glucocorticoid levels in previous studies may be explained by cases where energetic requirements (Eg) are very high, causing changes in allostatic load to constitute only proportionally minor changes in the Potential Resource Pool (PRP).
McEwen and Wingfield (2010) argued against the relevance of starvation as a defining factor for the allostatic load model, preferring the concept of energetic demand.
The definition of allostatic load developed by Bruce McEwen and Stellar (1993) and elaborated by Bruce McEwen (1998) refers to specific pathologies associated with chronic stress, particularly chronic exposure to elevated glucocorticoid hormones in humans and laboratory animals.
In the energetics-based framework by McEwen and Wingfield (2003), Type I allostatic overload occurs when allostatic load exceeds the energetic resources available in the environment, while Type II allostatic overload occurs when allostatic load remains high without exceeding basal energy available.
Resource availability (Eg) represents a limit to the energy an animal can expend without entering a negative energy balance and must be measured in the same units as allostatic load.
Fat reserves act as a buffer against allostatic overload by providing an energy source to supplement energy expenditure, according to Wingfield (2004).
The allostatic load framework was originally presented by McEwen and Wingfield in 2003.
Routine costs (Ei) in the allostatic load framework vary seasonally based on life-history stages such as breeding, migration, and molting.
The emergency life-history stage (ELHS) is a physiological state triggered by allostatic overload that redirects physiology and behavior toward individual survival, often interrupting normal life history stages.
Both the allostatic load framework and the Reactive Scope model incorporate the concept of a threshold, though they apply the concept differently.
The allostatic load model does not specifically predict cumulative consequences for recurrent acute events, such as escaping a predator, because the mediator control system resets once allostatic load returns to normal levels.
Bruce McEwen described allostatic load as "the price of adaptation that promotes pathophysiology."
Korte et al. (2005) define the Darwinian concept of stress as involving the benefits of allostasis and the costs of allostatic load, including trade-offs in health and disease.
The Reactive Scope model serves as an alternative to the allostatic load model and was first detailed in a 2009 paper by Romero et al.
Type I allostatic overload is distinct from negative energy balance, as animals can routinely burn fat reserves (e.g., during the night) without entering allostatic overload, as noted by Hatchwell et al. (2009).
Bruce McEwen and John Wingfield developed an energetics-based framework for allostatic load in 2003, where allostatic load is a function of Ee (basal existence), Ei (routine activity), and Eo (unpredictable perturbations).
In the allostatic load model, it is necessary to select an appropriate time interval to average energy expenditure because large, moment-to-moment fluctuations in energetic quantities should not trigger physiological overload.
Strategy 1 for endocrine response involves glucocorticoids gradually elevating in direct inverse correlation with the difference between allostatic load and resource availability (PRP) when PRP is low, reaching the ELHS activation threshold only when PRP equals zero.
McEwen and Wingfield (2010) argued that the suppression of glucocorticoids during Phase II starvation challenges the relevance of starvation as a defining factor for allostatic load.
McEwen (1998) introduced the concepts of allostasis and allostatic load in the context of stress, adaptation, and disease.
The definition of allostatic load has evolved into a spectrum, ranging from a focus on specific pathologies or damage (as defined by Picard et al., 2014 and Juster and McEwen, 2015) to a focus on an all-inclusive energetic quantity (as defined by Lattin and Romero, 2014 and Monaghan and Spencer, 2014).
Routine glucocorticoid fluctuations, such as those occurring with time of day, season, or life-history stage, are distinct from the abnormally high levels associated with allostatic overload (Eo).
Allostatic load is defined as an energetic quantity (Eload).
In the model of allostatic load, perturbation resistance potential (PRP) is quantified as the difference between available resources and all energetic costs of allostatic load, including daily routines, life history stages (such as breeding, migration, and molt), and the impact of environmental perturbations.
The most useful time interval for averaging energy expenditure to reflect allostatic load varies by species, sex, and season, based on the duration an animal can tolerate negative energy balance as part of its daily or seasonal routine.
Weather cues affect food availability and access and may serve as an anticipatory cue for allostatic load; they are most reliable when weather influences food availability and internal energy stores are low, but increase error when food remains available or the weather event is short enough to be survived with internal energy stores.
If the energy consumption rate (Ecr) replaces the energy gain rate (Eg) in the allostatic load model, allostatic overload does not occur until Phase III starvation, which satisfies the requirement that overload occurs concurrently with elevated glucocorticoid levels.
Past events, once passed, may not contribute to the energetic quantities of allostatic load or to the Predictive Reactive Profile (PRP), but they may be integrated into an animal’s perception of risk relative to the PRP and induce changes in feedback mechanisms that mediate hormonal responses to future energetic challenges.
Allostatic overload Type 2 occurs when an animal's allostatic load is chronically high, but the animal is not in a state of negative energy balance.
Juster and McEwen (2015) propose new directions for allostatic load research in the context of sleep and chronic stress.
The article 'Allostasis revisited: A perception, variation, and risk framework' identifies allostasis, allostatic load, perturbation resistance potential, glucocorticoid, and environment as key concepts.
When environmental conditions become extreme, glucocorticoid levels increase rapidly to level C as a result of allostatic overload, which triggers facultative responses such as the Emergency Life History Stage (ELHS).
Romero et al. (2009) cited the suppression of glucocorticoids during Phase II starvation as an argument against the applicability of the allostatic load model.
Replacing Eg with Ecr in the allostatic load model delays the occurrence of allostatic overload until Phase III starvation, which satisfies the requirement that overload occurs concurrently with elevated glucocorticoid levels.