The Trump Administration indirectly denies funds to the United Nations by declining to transfer approved payments, even when the United States Congress prevents budget cuts.
The United States Congress has prioritized defending democratic values and liberal elements in the world order within the context of the Sino-American rivalry, as evidenced by the passage of the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act in November 2019.
The US Administration and Congress view China as a 'revisionist power' that seeks to challenge the dominance of the United States and undermine the rules-based international order.
The Trump Administration and the United States Congress both maintain a hardline stance on China but disagree on the methods to use for competition.
The Barack Obama Administration continued to support international institutions and multilateral conflict-resolution processes, but significantly reduced financial commitments under pressure from the United States Congress.
Chinese official statements and media reports accuse the United States Congress and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of providing financial and verbal support to the protests in Hong Kong.
The United States administration indirectly denies funds to the United Nations by declining to transfer approved payments, even in cases where the US Congress prevented budget cuts.
Robert Sutter analyzed the overlapping priorities and hardening policies of the U.S. Congress and the Trump Administration toward Beijing in his 2019 article, 'Congress and Trump Administration China Policy: Overlapping Priorities, Uneasy Adjustments and Hardening toward Beijing'.
A group of China experts, including individuals who worked in earlier United States Administrations, sent an open letter to the President and Congress expressing discomfort with the current trend in United States policy toward China.
The United States Congress responded to concerns about Chinese influence by holding hearings and proposing legislation, including the Foreign Influence and Transparency Act and the Countering Foreign Propaganda Act.
The Trump Administration and the United States Congress both maintain a hard-line policy toward China but disagree on the specific methods to implement this strategy.
The US Administration and Congress generally view China as a 'revisionist power' that aims to challenge US dominance and undermine the rules-based international order.
Following threats by President Donald Trump to raise tariffs in two stages by the end of 2019, the Trump Administration agreed to a limited 'Phase One Deal' with China instead of imposing new tariffs, due to pressure from US businesses, Republicans in Congress, and trade unions.
The United States Administration and Congress view China as a 'revisionist power' that seeks to challenge the dominance of the United States and undermine the rules-based international order.
Official Chinese statements and media reports accuse the United States Congress and the CIA of supporting the 2019-2020 Hong Kong protests financially and verbally.
Both Republicans and Democrats in the United States Congress criticize the Trump Administration's use of unilateral import tariffs, arguing that these measures alienate American allies in Europe and Asia and weaken the US position against China.
Robert Sutter argues in a 2019 article that the US Congress and the Trump Administration share overlapping priorities regarding China policy, though they have experienced uneasy adjustments and a hardening stance toward Beijing.
While defending democratic values is not a priority for the serving US President, the US Congress has prioritized these concerns in the Sino-American rivalry, as evidenced by the passage of the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act in November 2019.
The United States Congress responded to concerns about Chinese influence by holding hearings and introducing legislative proposals, such as the Foreign Influence and Transparency Act and the Countering Foreign Propaganda Act.
Legislative proposals and initiatives in the US Congress reflect a shift in sentiment within the US business community and society regarding China.
Both Republicans and Democrats in the United States Congress criticize the Trump Administration's use of tariff threats, arguing that these measures alienate allies in Europe and Asia and weaken the United States' position against Beijing.
The human rights situation in China has prompted bipartisan initiatives in the US Congress to urge the Administration to impose sanctions against Chinese officials for the repression of the Uigurs.
Leading Democrats in the United States Congress and most Democratic candidates for the 2020 presidential election advocated for China policies similar to those of President Donald Trump, despite criticizing his political style and his approach to allies in Asia and Europe.
The United States Congress responded to concerns about Chinese influence by holding hearings and introducing legislative proposals, including the Foreign Influence and Transparency Act and the Countering Foreign Propaganda Act.
The United States Congress passed the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act in November 2019 as part of its effort to promote more decisive policies regarding democratic values and liberal elements in the world order.
Chinese official statements and media reports accuse the United States Congress and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of supporting the 2019-2020 Hong Kong protests financially and verbally.
Legislative proposals and initiatives in the United States Congress reflect a shift in sentiment within the United States business community and society regarding China.
Both political parties in the United States Congress generally support and seek to intensify the United States Administration's hard-line policy toward China rather than moderating it.
The Barack Obama Administration continued to support international institutions and multilateral conflict-resolution processes, but reduced financial commitments to these institutions under pressure from the United States Congress.
President Donald Trump signed China-critical legislation in late November 2019 because a two-thirds majority in the US Congress would have overturned a presidential veto.
Leading Democrats in Congress and nearly all Democratic candidates in the 2020 presidential primaries advocated for China policies similar to those of President Donald Trump, despite criticizing his political style and his approach to allies in Asia and Europe.
The human rights situation in China has prompted bipartisan initiatives in the US Congress, including proposals for sanctions against Chinese officials for the repression of the Uigurs.
The human rights situation in China has prompted bipartisan initiatives in the United States Congress to urge the Administration to respond more forcefully to the repression of the Uigurs, including through sanctions against Chinese officials.
President Donald Trump had little choice but to sign China-critical legislation in late 2019 because a two-thirds majority in the US Congress would have overturned any presidential veto.
Leading Democrats in the United States Congress and almost all Democratic candidates in the 2020 presidential primaries propagated policies on China similar to those of the Trump Administration, despite criticizing his political style and his treatment of allies.
President Donald Trump had limited choice regarding China-critical legislation because a two-thirds majority in the United States Congress would have overturned any presidential veto.
The Barack Obama Administration continued to support international institutions and multilateral conflict-resolution processes but reduced financial commitments under pressure from the US Congress.
The Trump Administration and the United States Congress both maintain a hard-line policy toward China, but they disagree on the specific methods and means to conduct the competition.
The US Congress, across both political parties, tends to support and intensify the Trump Administration's hard-line policy toward China rather than moderating it.
In an open letter to the United States President and Congress, a group of China experts advised against treating China as "an economic enemy or an existential national security threat."
The United States Congress, across both political parties, tends to support and intensify the Trump Administration's hard line on China rather than moderating it.
A group of China experts, including many who worked on China policy in earlier administrations, signed an open letter to the President and Congress advising against treating China as an economic enemy or an existential national security threat.