affective response
Also known as: affective response, affective responses
Facts (16)
Sources
Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in ... link.springer.com Feb 5, 2022 8 facts
referenceThe review classified stress outcomes according to the stress model described by Ice and James, which defines stress as a combination of affective, behavioural, and physiological responses that impact mental and physical health.
referenceDudenhöffer and Dormann studied customer-related social stressors and their impact on the affective reactions of service providers in a 2012 study published in the Journal of Organizational Behavior.
claimIn the study 'Work environment risk factors, self-perceived stress outcomes, and physiological measurements', the most commonly measured work environment risk factor was work intensity, and the most commonly measured stress outcome was affective response.
claimThe Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) was the most frequently used instrument to measure affective responses to stress in the studies reviewed.
claimMost correlations reported between work intensity and affective response in the reviewed studies were statistically significant.
claimCommuting to and from the workplace was not significantly correlated with affective responses in the majority of the studies reviewed.
claimCurrent research on workplace stress often fails to treat stress outcomes as multifaceted responses, instead focusing primarily on affective responses.
claimAffective response was commonly correlated with the social environment in the workplace, and this relationship was more often statistically significant than not.
Neuro-insights: a systematic review of neuromarketing perspectives ... frontiersin.org 8 facts
referenceZhang et al. (2021) utilized EEG (ERP) and IRT to study the Repetition Effect, Repetition Suppression, and Celebrity Effect across pre-purchase, purchase, and post-purchase stages, with a focus on affective responses.
claimNeuromarketing techniques measure variables including affective responses, emotional valence, arousal, cognitive load, and other cognitive processes.
referenceZamith et al. (2025) utilized GSR and eye tracking (ET) to study consumer behavior across pre-purchase, purchase, and post-purchase stages, with a focus on affective responses.
referenceMedina et al. (2021) utilized fMRI and questionnaires to study the Attitude-behavioral gap across pre-purchase, purchase, and post-purchase stages, with a focus on affective responses.
referenceWajid et al. (2021) utilized EEG and a moment-by-moment picture sort technique scale to study the SOR Model, Dual system Model, and Approach-avoidance Model across pre-purchase, purchase, and post-purchase stages, with a focus on affective responses.
referenceCha et al. (2020) utilized fNIRS to study the Fast-diffusion model, Sensory load theory, and Perceptual load theory across pre-purchase, purchase, and post-purchase stages, with a focus on affective responses.
referenceGómez-Carmona et al. (2021) utilized fMRI to study consumer behavior across pre-purchase, purchase, and post-purchase stages, with a focus on affective responses.
referenceYun et al. (2021) utilized fMRI and questionnaires to study Evolution Theory, Social Baseline Theory, Body-heart-mind Model, and the Free energy principle across pre-purchase, purchase, and post-purchase stages, with a focus on affective responses.