concept

cyber attacks

Also known as: cyberattacks, cyber attack, cyberattack

Facts (29)

Sources
Cybersecurity Trends and Predictions 2025 From Industry Insiders itprotoday.com ITPro Today 17 facts
claimThe automation of cyber attacks via multimodal AI will democratize cyberthreats, enabling less skilled threat actors to launch advanced attacks with minimal human intervention.
claimAnn Irvine observes that the frequency of cybersecurity attacks has been steadily increasing year-over-year for several years.
claimThe accessibility of AI-powered tools lowers the barrier to entry for less skilled attackers and accelerates the speed of cyberattacks.
claimMulti-modal AI systems, by integrating text, images, voice, and coding capabilities, will allow threat actors to streamline and automate the entire pipeline of a cyber attack, including target profiling, phishing, zero-day exploit discovery, malware generation, and data exfiltration.
claimOrganizations face critical risks due to limited visibility into how vendors access their networks, which creates blind spots regarding the origin of cyber attacks.
claimBryan Patton observes that widespread outages affecting major service providers and platforms will extend the impact of cyber attacks beyond companies and governments to consumer lives in 2025.
claimArtificial intelligence is transforming the threat landscape by making cyber attacks faster, more scalable, and more automated.
claimThe healthcare industry will experience heightened risk for potentially devastating cyberattacks in 2025, driven by escalating geopolitical conflicts involving Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea.
claimSam Peters, the chief product officer at ISMS.online, predicts a rise in cyberattacks on wearable technology, such as fitness trackers and smartwatches, as the health data they collect becomes a lucrative target for criminals.
claimMany organizations currently struggle to defend against basic cyber attacks, making it critical for them to implement AI in their defensive strategies.
claimThe author predicts that deepfake technology will become increasingly commoditized in 2025, allowing adversaries to use it on a larger scale to target everyday people and conduct financially motivated cyber attacks on companies.
claimCasey Ellis observes that attribution of cyberattacks is becoming more challenging due to evolving global alliances, the acceleration of time-to-effectiveness through generative AI and technique-sharing, and a broadening spectrum of attribution.
claimIn 2025, threat actors will weaponize generative AI to orchestrate large-scale cyber attacks, including autonomously identifying vulnerabilities, crafting deceptive phishing campaigns, and bypassing detection systems.
claimDaniel dos Santos, head of security research at Forescout Research - Vedere Labs, predicts that by 2025, more nation-states will adopt hacktivist identities to execute sophisticated cyber attacks, including data breaches and cyber-physical disruptions, to wage silent wars.
claimSam Peters, the chief product officer at ISMS.online, suggests that manufacturers of wearable devices will be forced to implement more robust data encryption and authentication methods to counter cyberattacks.
perspectiveMark Bowling recommends that the United States must implement more controls to prevent cyberattacks, specifically by investing in tools that improve visibility into critical infrastructure.
claimAI-powered bots allow threat actors to execute large-scale attacks with minimal effort, potentially allowing less capable adversaries to disrupt services and access sensitive data.
Rethinking Espionage in the Modern Era cjil.uchicago.edu Chicago Journal of International Law 10 facts
claimJames E. McGhee proposes a two-tiered analysis for cyber law where 'cyber intrusion' is used as a catch-all term until it can be further defined as a cyberattack, a cybercrime, or cyberespionage.
claimGrouping all cyber intrusions under the umbrella of 'cyber attacks' would allow states to enact countermeasures against any intrusion.
claimThe U.S. Department of Defense does not explicitly define cyber espionage or cyber attack in its dictionary of military terms, instead categorizing cyber espionage as espionage conducted as a cyberspace operation.
claimHathaway et al. define a cyber-attack as any action taken to undermine the functions of a computer network for a political or national security purpose.
claimBrown argues that the distinction between cyber attacks and espionage is more difficult to make than the traditional distinction between soldiers and spies, because soldiers and spies are easier to distinguish by their uniforms or weapons.
claimThe International Court of Justice has discussed the possibility that constant smaller cyber attacks could be aggregated to reach the threshold of an 'armed attack' under the U.N. Charter, provided that the attacker can be accurately attributed in every instance.
claimCustomary international law may evolve to classify broad categories of cyber activities, particularly the use of specific cyber tools like hacking, as violations if they are carried out in a manner similar to cyber attacks.
claimMajor Graham H. Todd argues that cyberespionage should be classified under the cyberattacks framework to deter states by increasing the likelihood of triggering armed self-defense.
claimShackelford notes that countermeasures are only acceptable against unlawful behavior, meaning they would not be allowed if cyberespionage and cyberattacks were distinguished.
claimMatthew Waxman defines cyber-attacks as efforts to alter, disrupt, or destroy computer systems, networks, or the information and programs contained within them.
How Open-Source AI Drives Responsible Innovation - The Atlantic theatlantic.com The Atlantic 2 facts
claimOpen-source AI systems help manage emerging risks such as intentional misuse by bad actors (cyberattacks, disinformation) and unintentional harms (exposure of private user data, entrenched biases in training data).
referenceCyberSecEval is a set of cybersecurity safety benchmarks included in Meta's open-source safety tools that helps developers understand and quantify the risks of large language models suggesting insecure code or being misused for malicious content or cyberattacks.