Bisby et al. (2022) investigated whether internet-delivered pain management programs can reduce psychological distress in patients with chronic pain, specifically exploring the relationships between anxiety, depression, pain intensity, and disability.
Boersma et al. (2019) conducted a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a transdiagnostic emotion-focused exposure treatment for chronic pain patients who also suffer from comorbid anxiety and depression.
Jorn (2015) proposed an expanded model for the biopsychosocial interview of chronic pain patients using rational emotive behavior therapy, published in the Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy.
Gardiner et al. (2019) published a randomized controlled trial in PLoS One evaluating the effectiveness of integrative medicine group visits for patients with chronic pain and depressive symptoms.
The efficacy of CBT-based interventions for comorbid pain and depression is clinically relevant on average, consistent with previous meta-analyses in chronic pain by Williams et al. (2020) and depression by Lorenzo-Luaces et al. (2018), as reported by Sanabria-Mazo et al. (2020).
The systematic review included studies involving adults (≥ 18 years) with non-oncologic chronic pain lasting longer than 12 weeks and clinically relevant psychological distress.
The prevalence of chronic pain ranges from 10% to 30% worldwide.
The CBT intervention in the Aragonès et al. (2019) study consisted of 9 sessions of 120 minutes each, delivered by a psychologist and a primary care physician, and focused on optimized management of major depression, care management, and psychoeducation for chronic pain and depression.
The study by Ólason et al. (2018) in Iceland evaluated the efficacy of CBT combined with treatment as usual (TAU) versus TAU alone for patients with chronic pain and depression or anxiety.
The systematic review search strategy utilized a Boolean search string combining three categories: (1) pain-related terms (e.g., chronic pain, neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia), (2) psychological distress terms (e.g., depression, anxiety, stress, emotional regulation), and (3) intervention terms (e.g., psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness, acceptance and commitment therapy).
In a study by Torrijos-Zarcero et al. (2021) in Spain, patients with chronic pain, depression, and anxiety were treated in a randomized controlled trial comparing Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MSC) (n=62) against Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) (n=61) using weekly face-to-face sessions.
McCracken (2023) explored the potential for process-based therapy as a personalized pain management approach for individuals with chronic pain in the European Journal of Pain.
The relationship between chronic pain and psychological distress is complex and bidirectional, as noted by Wittchen et al. (2011).
Bell et al. (2020) published the protocol for the INternet ThERapy for deprESsion trial (INTEREST), a patient-preference, randomised controlled feasibility trial comparing iACT, iCBT, and attention control among individuals with comorbid chronic pain and depression.
The patient populations in the 13 studies included in the systematic review were: chronic pain (38%), chronic low back pain (23%), chronic musculoskeletal pain (15%), chronic back pain (8%), chronic spinal cord injury (8%), and non-specific chronic pain (8%).
The systematic review of cognitive behavioral therapy-based interventions for comorbid chronic pain and psychological distress was limited by a lack of trials with low risk of bias (RoB), making it premature to conclude the magnitude of efficacy for these interventions.
Traditional Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) has beneficial effects in adults with chronic pain, according to Williams et al. (2020).
Hughes et al. (2017) published a review in the Clinical Journal of Pain regarding the use of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for chronic pain.
Different forms of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) are frequently applied to chronic pain and related conditions like anxiety and depression, and appear effective when explored independently, according to research by Churchill et al. (2013), Cuijpers et al. (2013), Buhrman et al. (2016), and Pasarelu et al. (2017).
Torrijos-Zarcero et al. (2021) conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate a mindful self-compassion program for patients with chronic pain.
De Jong et al. (2018) conducted a randomized controlled pilot study on the use of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for unipolar depression in patients with chronic pain.
In a study by Gasslander et al. (2022) in Sweden, patients with chronic pain (CP) and psychological distress were treated with either online CBT or Treatment As Usual (TAU) in weekly sessions.
Snyder and Handrup (2018) discuss the challenges involved in the treatment of patients with comorbid chronic pain, depression, and anxiety.
A systematic review of cognitive behavioral therapy-based interventions for patients with comorbid chronic pain and psychological distress was conducted using searches in Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus up to March 18th, 2023.
The efficacy of third-generation therapies should be explored for patients with chronic pain and comorbid psychological stress once more robust evidence becomes available.
Snyder and Handrup (2018) assert that the concurrent appearance of chronic pain and significant psychological distress requires attention from researchers, clinicians, and policymakers, and demands effective management strategies to improve the health and well-being of affected individuals.
Buhrman et al. (2016) performed a systematic review of internet-based interventions for chronic pain, including conditions such as headache.
Roberts et al. (2018) state that the multidimensional nature of chronic pain and psychological distress, which includes sensory, affective, and behavioral dimensions, presents a challenge for the design and delivery of interventions.
The comorbidity of psychological distress and chronic pain generates a higher degree of functional impairment than the presence of either condition alone, according to Mansfield et al. (2016).
Veehof, Trompetter, Bohlmeijer, and Schreurs (2016) conducted a meta-analytic review titled 'Acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain', published in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy.
Hooten (2016) reviewed the shared neural mechanisms, epidemiology, and treatment of chronic pain and mental health disorders in Mayo Clinic Proceedings.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is the most applied psychological approach to chronic pain, according to McCracken (2023).
Pardos-Gascón et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review comparing the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy and mindfulness-based therapies for chronic pain, published in the International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology.
It is crucial to evaluate and treat depression in chronic pain populations to achieve better treatment outcomes.
The comorbidity of chronic pain and psychological distress is a complex problem with a multifactorial aetiology that causes substantial health and social impacts.
Rayner et al. (2016) demonstrate that individuals with chronic pain are more likely to experience psychological distress (such as anxiety and depression), and individuals with psychological distress are more likely to report chronic pain.
According to epidemiological studies, the comorbidity between chronic pain and psychological distress in clinical practice is higher than 60%.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)-based interventions for depression or chronic pain show consistent efficacy with previous systematic reviews (Lorenzo-Luaces et al., 2018; López-López et al., 2019; Williams et al., 2020), though the magnitude of the effect is modest.
Future research on psychosocial therapies for chronic pain and psychological distress should identify the core elements that drive therapeutic effects, determine which ingredients are effective for specific patients, and assess the variance explained by universal factors shared by all therapies.
More randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based on Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBI), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and Behavioral Activation Treatment for Depression (BATD) are needed to determine the overall efficacy of these interventions for patients with comorbid chronic pain and psychological distress.
Mindfulness-based Interventions (MBI), Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and Behavioral Activation Therapy for Depression (BATD) produce positive effects in patients with chronic pain, according to research by Jorn (2015), Veehof et al. (2016), Hughes et al. (2017), Boersma et al. (2019), Khoo et al. (2019), Gloster et al. (2020), and Pardos-Gascón et al. (2021).
Traditional cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) improves depression, anxiety, and quality of life in patients with comorbid chronic pain and clinically relevant psychological distress, but does not improve pain intensity or pain catastrophizing.
Ólason et al. (2018) conducted a randomized controlled trial with a 3-year follow-up on the use of cognitive behavioral therapy for depression and anxiety within an interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for chronic pain, published in the International Journal of Behavioral Medicine.
Research interest is increasing in how CBT-based therapies, including Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBI), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and Behavioral Activation Treatment for Depression (BATD), can improve the functional status and quality of life in patients with chronic pain experiencing depressive and/or anxiety symptoms.
Khoo et al. (2019) conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis published in Evidence-Based Mental Health comparing group-based mindfulness-based stress reduction and cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment and management of chronic pain.
Buhrman et al. (2015) studied the use of individualized guided internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for patients suffering from chronic pain with comorbid depression and anxiety.
The systematic review titled 'A systematic review of cognitive behavioral therapy-based ...' aims to examine the efficacy of CBT-based interventions for patients with comorbid chronic pain and clinically relevant psychological distress, noting that this specific efficacy has been scarcely assessed in previous literature.
Gasslander et al. (2022) conducted a randomized controlled trial published in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy regarding the use of tailored internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for individuals suffering from chronic pain and comorbid psychological distress.
The CBT intervention in the Ólason et al. (2018) study consisted of 12 sessions of 45 minutes each, delivered by a multidisciplinary team including psychologists, nurses, occupational therapists, and social workers, and experienced a 34% dropout rate.
A systematic review of CBT-based interventions for patients with chronic pain and clinically relevant psychological distress analyzed twelve Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and one non-RCT published between 2011 and 2023, finding positive but modest results.
The CBT intervention for patients with chronic pain and depression studied by Buhrman et al. (2015) consisted of 8 weekly online sessions delivered by graduate students trained in CBT under the supervision of a clinical psychologist, focusing on behavioral activation and psychoeducation.
Snyder and Handrup (2018) report that the presence of psychological distress in patients with chronic pain increases pain complaints and reduces quality of life.
In a study by De Jong et al. (2016, 2018) in the United States, patients with chronic pain (CP) and major depressive disorder (MDD) were treated with Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) combined with treatment as usual (TAU) versus TAU alone, with the intervention group receiving weekly face-to-face sessions.
Williams, Fisher, Hearn, and Eccleston (2020) published a review titled 'Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults' in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Lin et al. (2019) published the protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis regarding the use of acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain.
McCracken, Yu, and Vowles (2022) reviewed new generation psychological treatments for chronic pain in the BMJ.
Depression and anxiety are among the most diagnosed mental health conditions in people with chronic pain, and comorbid pain and psychological distress are associated with a poorer prognosis and higher therapy resistance compared to either condition alone.
Investigating the mediating role of psychological flexibility in the third wave of Cognitive Behavioral Therapies (CBTs) for chronic pain patients is important for understanding the mechanisms of change underlying treatment effectiveness, identifying effective treatment components, and enhancing treatment outcomes (McCracken et al., 2022).
Moore et al. (2010) established best practices for reporting systematic reviews regarding evidence in chronic pain, published in the journal Pain.
The De Jong et al. (2016, 2018) study on Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) for patients with chronic pain and major depressive disorder involved 26 participants in the intervention group (80.8% female, mean age 51.3) and 14 participants in the control group (64.3% female, mean age 49.9).
Kroenke et al. (2011) found that the comorbidity of psychological distress and chronic pain negatively influences the response to both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments.
Hilton et al. (2017) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine regarding the use of mindfulness meditation for chronic pain.
CBT targeting populations with chronic pain and comorbid psychological distress shows more modest effects than CBT targeting either condition separately, according to Sanabria-Mazo et al. (2020).
In a 2015 randomized controlled trial conducted in Sweden, Buhrman et al. studied patients with chronic pain (CP) and depression, comparing a treatment group receiving CBT plus treatment as usual (TAU) (n=28) against a control group receiving only TAU (n=24).
Chronic pain and clinical psychological distress involve shared neurobiological and psychosocial processes, as stated by Hooten (2016).
De Jong et al. (2016) studied the effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on body awareness in patients suffering from chronic pain and comorbid depression.