Knowledge Tree
Relations (1)
related 3.32 — strongly supporting 9 facts
Coherentism is a central theory within the field of epistemology that addresses the structure of justification and belief [1], [2]. It is frequently discussed in relation to other epistemological theories like foundationalism and infinitism to resolve problems such as infinite regress [3], [4].
Facts (9)
Sources
What Is Epistemology? Pt. 3: The Nature of Justification and Belief philosimplicity.com 5 facts
claimFoundherentism is an epistemological theory that attempts to reconcile foundationalism and coherentism by combining a set of beliefs that have an externally established foundation with internal relationships between those beliefs.
claimCoherentism and foundationalism are rival theories in modern epistemology, and both aim to address the problem of infinite regress.
claimFoundationalism and coherentism in epistemology focus on the structure of justification and belief.
claimCoherentism is an epistemological theory that evaluates the validity of a belief or justification based on how well it relates to and validates other beliefs and justifications.
claimInfinitism is an epistemological theory that accepts the idea that all justifications require further justifications, effectively rejecting the infinite regress constraints of both coherentism and foundationalism.
Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu 4 facts
claimThe 'compromise position' in epistemology is characterized by four features: it allows for doxastic basicality; it does not allow for epistemic basicality; it is inconsistent with doxastic coherentism; and it qualifies as a version of coherentism known as dependence coherentism.
claimExperiential foundationalism is a theory in epistemology that posits perceptual experiences as a source of justification, which coherentists challenge by asking why perceptual experiences serve this function (the J-question).
claimAccording to the coherentist view of epistemology, perceptual experiences serve as a source of justification only if the individual has considered the matter and believes those experiences to be reliable.
claimThe 'compromise position' in epistemology attempts to bridge foundationalism and coherentism by arguing that perceptual experiences are a source of justification because a subject has justification for taking those experiences to be reliable, without requiring the subject to hold a belief that attributes reliability to those experiences.