Jennifer Lackey argues against Alvin Goldman's 2014 account of group justification and proposes an alternative account where a group G justifiedly believes that p if and only if (1) G believes that p, and (2) full disclosure of evidence relevant to p, accompanied by rational deliberation among members of G in accordance with epistemic normative requirements, would not result in further evidence that, when added to the bases of G's members' beliefs that p, yields a total belief set that fails to make sufficiently probable that p.

Authors

• Person: Not available Organization: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Sources

• Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy via serper

Referenced by nodes (3)

• Jennifer Lackey entity
• Alvin Goldman entity
• group belief concept