Conciliationists argue that when an epistemic peer disagrees with you, you are under a rational obligation to change your view, suspend judgment, or reopen the inquiry.

Authors

• Person: Not available Organization: MIT Press
  Social Epistemology - Open Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science

Sources

• Social Epistemology - Open Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science oecs.mit.edu MIT Press via serper

Referenced by nodes (3)

• disagreement concept
• epistemic peers concept
• Conciliationism concept