Knowledge Tree
Relations (1)
related 4.17 — strongly supporting 17 facts
Foundationalism is an epistemological theory that specifically defines the structure and requirements of justification, as described in [1], [2], and [3]. The relationship is further evidenced by how foundationalism addresses the logical problem of justification regress [4] and defines the criteria for how beliefs confer justification upon one another [5], [6].
Facts (17)
Sources
What Is Epistemology? Pt. 3: The Nature of Justification and Belief philosimplicity.com 5 facts
claimFoundationalism addresses the logical problem of infinite regress, which is the assumption that every justification requires a further justification.
claimFoundationalism and coherentism in epistemology focus on the structure of justification and belief.
claimFoundationalism is an epistemological theory that focuses on the structure of justification rather than its source, asserting that self-evident axioms or basic beliefs are necessary to support other justifications and beliefs.
claimEpistemological positions are not mutually exclusive; for example, an individual can be an externalist regarding knowledge while being an internalist regarding justification, or simultaneously a fallibilist and a foundationalist.
claimInfinitism is an epistemological theory that accepts the idea that all justifications require further justifications, effectively rejecting the infinite regress constraints of both coherentism and foundationalism.
Virtue Epistemology | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy iep.utm.edu 4 facts
claimErnest Sosa argues that standard foundationalist accounts of justification are flawed because they rely on the premise that the justification of non-basic beliefs derives from basic beliefs, which are themselves justified by sensory experience, memory, and rational insight.
claimErnest Sosa claims that an adequate version of foundationalism must explain the apparent unity of the various foundationalist principles that connect the ultimate sources of justification with the beliefs they justify.
claimErnest Sosa's proposed view of justification is an externalist version of foundationalism because a belief can be justified by an intellectual virtue without the person holding the belief being internally or subjectively aware of that source.
claimCoherentists and foundationalists generally agree that justification for believing a claim requires having a good reason for thinking that the claim is true, but they disagree on the logical structure of that reason.
Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu 3 facts
claimThe regress argument for foundationalism posits that for any justified belief (B1), if it is not basic, it must be justified by another belief (B2), which in turn requires justification, leading to an infinite chain or a loop unless the chain terminates in a basic belief.
claimFoundationalism characterizes knowledge and justification as a structure resembling a building, where a superstructure rests upon a foundation of basic beliefs.
claimThe 'compromise position' in epistemology attempts to bridge foundationalism and coherentism by arguing that perceptual experiences are a source of justification because a subject has justification for taking those experiences to be reliable, without requiring the subject to hold a belief that attributes reliability to those experiences.
Epistemology | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy iep.utm.edu 3 facts
claimFoundationalism requires that basic beliefs must either be self-justified or derive their justification from a non-doxastic source, such as sensory inputs.
claimRoderick Chisholm was one of the first authors to provide a systematic analysis of knowledge, and his account of justification is classified as foundationalist.
claimBasic beliefs are defined in foundationalism as beliefs that are able to confer justification on other, non-basic beliefs without having their own justification conferred upon them by other beliefs.
Epistemic Justification – Introduction to Philosophy: Epistemology press.rebus.community 2 facts
claimInfinitism is a theory of justification that posits that the structure of justification is neither foundationalist nor coherentist, but rather consists of an infinite number of appropriately structured, available reasons upon which a justified belief rests.
claimFoundationalists are epistemologists who believe that justification has a structure consisting of justified foundational (or basic) beliefs that serve as the epistemic foundation for justified non-basic beliefs.