justification ↔ rationality

Relations (1)

related 2.58 — strongly supporting 5 facts

Justification and rationality are closely linked concepts in epistemology, often used interchangeably to describe the epistemic status of beliefs as noted in [1]. Both terms serve as core criteria for assessing the cognitive quality of beliefs [2] and are central subjects of traditional epistemological inquiry [3], which Jaegwon Kim contrasts with naturalized epistemology [4] and the study of testimonially-based beliefs [5].

Facts (5)

Sources

Naturalized Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2 facts

claimJaegwon Kim argues that Willard Van Orman Quine's naturalized epistemology studies a different topic than traditional epistemology, specifically shifting focus from questions of rationality, justification, and knowledge to the causal connections between sensory evidence and beliefs.

claimTraditional epistemology focuses on questions of rationality, justification, and whether an epistemic support relation holds between basic evidence and beliefs about the world.

Epistemology - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org Wikipedia 2 facts

claimEpistemologists use epistemic norms as criteria to assess the cognitive quality of beliefs, such as their justification and rationality.

claimRationality is closely related to justification, and the terms 'rational belief' and 'justified belief' are sometimes used interchangeably.

Epistemology of Testimony | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy iep.utm.edu Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy 1 fact

claimThe epistemology of testimonially-based belief concerns the epistemic status of a subject's belief, specifically evaluating whether the belief is justified, rational, warranted, supported by evidence, or constitutes knowledge.