Knowledge Tree
Relations (1)
related 8.76 — strongly supporting 407 facts
Iran and Israel are linked through a long-standing geopolitical rivalry characterized by direct military and cyber conflicts, such as the 2025-2026 military operations [1], [2] and the 2010 Stuxnet cyberattack [3]. Their relationship is further defined by mutual strategic antagonism [4], [5], [6] and regional proxy tensions involving third-party nations like Azerbaijan [7], [8].
Facts (407)
Sources
Experts react: How the US war with Iran is playing out around the ... atlanticcouncil.org 28 facts
perspectiveIsrael views the current conflict as an opportunity for impactful change within Iran.
claimHezbollah faces a significant dilemma regarding whether to attack Israel on Iranian instructions, as such an action would likely trigger an overwhelming Israeli military response targeting Lebanese infrastructure, including Beirut airport, power stations, and bridges.
perspectiveNicholas Blanford asserts that Lebanese citizens, including Shias, would not support Hezbollah if the organization initiated a war with Israel on behalf of Iran, a country for which many Lebanese have little sympathy.
accountFollowing joint US and Israeli strikes on Iran, Iran launched retaliatory missile and drone attacks against US military bases in the United Arab Emirates, including Al Dhafra Air Base.
accountIsrael closed all crossings into the Gaza Strip shortly after attacks on Iran began.
claimThe United Arab Emirates maintains a security partnership with the United States while simultaneously aligning with Israel on regional concerns, specifically regarding Iran’s missile program and its network of regional militias.
claimThe United Arab Emirates maintains a security partnership with the United States and quietly aligns with Israel regarding concerns over Iran's missile program and regional militia network.
accountDuring the escalation linked to US-Israeli strikes on Iran, Iranian missiles or projectiles hit Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Jordan, despite none of these states launching attacks against Iran from their territory.
perspectiveIsrael views the current geopolitical situation as uniquely favorable for achieving impactful change within Iran.
claimThe United Arab Emirates maintains a security partnership with the United States while simultaneously aligning with Israel on regional concerns, specifically regarding Iran's missile program and its network of regional militias.
accountThe United States and Israel have violated Hezbollah’s 'red line' by killing Iranian leader Ali Khamenei and launching a massive air campaign against Iran with the explicit goal of effecting regime change.
perspectiveGazans perceive Iran and its proxies as the few actors who attempted an armed response against Israel before encountering superior US and Israeli force and agreeing to cease-fires.
claimIranian decision-makers positioned their senior echelon and deployed resources with complacency, exposing them to a joint Israeli and US attack that had been planned in advance.
claimThe US-Israeli military campaign launched on Saturday aims to achieve regime change in Iran.
claimUS and Israeli principals have asserted that the Iranian public must step up and chart their own future.
claimA US-Israeli military campaign aimed at regime change in Iran was launched on Saturday, resulting in the death of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
perspectiveIsrael holds the perspective that the current situation provides an opportunity for impactful change within Iran.
accountThe United States and Israel killed Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and launched a massive air campaign against Iran with the explicit goal of effecting regime change.
accountFollowing joint US and Israeli strikes on Iran, Iran launched retaliatory missile and drone attacks against US military bases in the United Arab Emirates, including Al Dhafra Air Base.
claimIf Hezbollah leadership ignores an Iranian instruction to attack Israel, the decision risks rupturing the material and ideological linkage that binds the party to Iran’s clerical leadership.
accountDuring the escalation linked to US-Israeli strikes on Iran, Iranian missiles or projectiles hit Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Jordan, despite none of these states launching attacks against Iran.
claimHezbollah faces a strategic dilemma regarding whether to attack Israel on Iranian instructions, as such an action would likely trigger an overwhelming Israeli military response targeting Lebanese infrastructure, including Beirut airport, power stations, and bridges.
claimThe United States and Israel have crossed Hezbollah's "red line" by killing Iranian leader Ali Khamenei and launching a massive air campaign against Iran with the explicit goal of effecting regime change.
claimThe US-Israeli military campaign launched on Saturday resulted in the death of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
perspectiveGazans perceive Iran and its proxies as the few actors who attempted an armed response against Israel before encountering superior Israeli and US force.
claimHezbollah's leadership faces a risk of rupturing its material and ideological ties to Iran's clerical leadership if it chooses to ignore an Iranian instruction to attack Israel.
accountThe United States and Israel launched a joint military campaign on a Saturday aimed at achieving regime change in Iran, which resulted in the death of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
claimHezbollah faces a significant dilemma regarding whether to attack Israel on Iranian instructions, as such an action would likely trigger an overwhelming Israeli military response against both the organization and Lebanese infrastructure, including Beirut airport, power stations, and bridges.
Opportunities for Collective Regional Security in the Middle East carnegieendowment.org 28 facts
claimFollowing the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks, the Middle East experienced an escalation of direct and proxy wars involving Israel, Iran, Türkiye, and armed groups including Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Syrian factions.
claimIran's antagonistic approach toward Israel fueled structural tensions with Egypt and Jordan, both of which are committed to peace initiatives and the pursuit of a two-state solution.
claimIran implemented a regional strategy designed to deter the United States and Israel from threatening Iranian security, targeting Iranian nuclear infrastructure, or undermining the military capabilities of Iranian allies.
claimEgypt, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Türkiye, Israel, and Iran recalibrated their foreign policies in response to the instability and shifting landscape caused by the Arab Spring.
claimThe interplay between Iran and Israel has entrenched the Middle East in a protracted war of attrition, characterized by mutual escalations that perpetuate instability and a cycle of violence.
claimThe Arab Spring uprisings caused radical changes to the foreign policies of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Türkiye, Israel, and Iran, similar to how previous conflicts like the Iran-Iraq War, the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, and the American invasion of Iraq reshaped the region.
claimThe Middle East's instability is fueled by its status as a battleground for direct and proxy conflicts, specifically Israel's rivalry with Iran and a broader regional arms race.
claimRegional actors are currently involved in direct or proxy conflicts: Israel is in tension with Iran; Türkiye is intervening in Syria and Iraq; the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia are militarily involved in Yemen; and Egypt is involved in Libya, Sudan, and the Horn of Africa.
claimThe United Arab Emirates faced difficulty mitigating tensions between Israel and Iran, as escalating hostilities undermined the country's efforts to shield the Gulf region from the fallout of the broader conflict.
claimIran's traditional strategies to regain influence, such as reasserting the power of its allies in Gaza and Lebanon, rallying the Assad regime in Syria, or deploying Iraqi and Yemeni militias in cross-border operations against Israel, have proven inadequate.
perspectiveTo achieve long-term objectives in Syria—including integrating Turkish-backed militias, pressuring Kurdish factions, returning Syrian refugees, and leading reconstruction—Türkiye must coordinate with Iran, Israel, Egypt, and Gulf States.
claimIsrael's military campaigns have crippled much of the military infrastructure of Hamas and its allied Palestinian factions, and depleted Hezbollah's stockpiles of Iranian-supplied rockets and weaponry.
claimIsrael refused to withdraw from the Syrian Golan Heights, engaged in military conflicts with Hezbollah, including the 2006 war, and conducted repeated strikes against Iranian allies, often in coordination with the United States.
claimThe ongoing conflict in the Middle East, driven by the ambitions of Israel and Iran, has resulted in significant human suffering, material destruction, and the erosion of regional stability, hindering prospects for peace and sustainable development.
accountBetween 2015 and 2023, Israel employed a dual strategy of aggressive action by far-right and religious governments against Palestinians and Iranian allies, alongside calculated diplomatic openness toward select regional actors.
claimSaudi Arabia's ability to shield itself from regional fallout is threatened by direct and proxy conflicts between Israel, Iran, and Türkiye, necessitating a robust collective security arrangement to achieve its domestic and strategic priorities.
claimAbu Dhabi is concerned about the potential fallout from the collapse of the Bashar al-Assad regime in Syria, the resurgence of Islamist groups in Syria, and the geopolitical competition among Türkiye, Iran, and Israel in the Arab Mashreq.
claimEgypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Türkiye, Israel, and Iran possess significant political, military, economic, and diplomatic influence that allows them to impact regional stability in the Middle East.
claimIsrael's strategic goals prior to October 7, 2023, included marginalizing the Palestinian cause, eroding prospects for a two-state solution, shifting the regional agenda toward confronting Iran and its allies, combating terrorism, and establishing security alliances with Arab states.
claimIsrael, Iran, Türkiye, and the United Arab Emirates continue to wield military capabilities in ways that perpetuate cycles of violence and delay meaningful collective action in the Middle East.
claimIsraeli military strikes in Syria targeting Iran's military presence have accelerated the dissolution of the Assad regime, resulting in a state of anarchy dominated by competing armed factions.
claimIran and Israel have played central roles in perpetuating violence across Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen.
accountIsrael escalated its military offensives against Iran and its proxies in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen in response to attacks from the Iranian bloc.
claimIsrael's current strategic focus is countering Shiite militias in Iraq and the Houthis in Yemen to limit Iranian regional leverage.
claimIsrael has emerged as a strategic winner in the current Middle East conflict, with Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, and their allies substantially weakened, though the country remains in a precarious position.
claimBefore October 7, 2023, regional actors adopted varied strategies to increase security: Saudi Arabia sought to ease tensions with Iran, the United Arab Emirates focused on deepening cooperation with Israel, Egypt prioritized national security amidst domestic challenges, and Türkiye reduced its engagement in regional conflicts.
claimThe feasibility of a collective regional security endeavor led by Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the UAE, Türkiye, Israel, and Iran is contingent on overcoming significant obstacles, including mutual distrust, conflicting strategic goals, and the divergent policies of their respective governments.
perspectiveIsrael intensified pressure on Iran and its state and nonstate allies, viewing them as existential threats to Israeli national security.
Iran in crisis: the landscape after the Twelve-Day War - OSW osw.waw.pl 22 facts
accountIsrael conducted a campaign against Iran involving disinformation operations, strikes against critical infrastructure and security structures, and support for exiled opposition groups including monarchists, the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (MEK/MKO), and separatist Kurdish and Baluch organizations.
accountSince 2023, Israel has been systematically dismantling the network of proxies maintained by Iran in Palestine and Lebanon.
accountIn the autumn of 2024, Israel launched direct military strikes on Iran, which resulted in the destruction of vital assets including Iranian air defence systems.
perspectiveThe Iranian ruling elite is deeply distrustful of the United States as a negotiating partner and harbors concerns that the United States may use force or fail to control Israel.
claimIsrael is considered the most serious challenge to Iran because Israel does not wish to be part of any political process aimed at normalizing relations with Iran and would likely take active steps to undermine any agreements reached.
claimIsrael conducted a complex operation aimed at provoking social unrest and mobilizing the Iranian opposition to undermine public trust in the Iranian state.
claimIran's primary foreign and security policy objectives over the past decades have been to ensure national security against threats from the United States and its regional partners, primarily Israel, and to establish Iran as a regional power.
accountThe Twelve-Day War between Israel and Iran occurred in June 2025, marking the culmination of a decades-long international crisis surrounding Iran.
claimDespite the neutralization of its air defence system and the depletion of its offensive arsenal, Iran still possesses missiles, drones, and the capability to conduct hybrid operations against Israel, US forces, and their partners via its network of proxies.
claimA radical, sudden collapse of the Iranian system is more likely if there is active external involvement, such as an expansion of the actions Israel undertook during the Twelve-Day War.
measurementOfficial data indicates that Iranian air attacks against Israel killed 33 people, including 32 civilians.
accountBetween 13 and 24 June 2025, Israel targeted Iran with airstrikes, sabotage, and disinformation operations on an unprecedented scale.
claimThe risk of further Israeli aerial and hybrid attacks aimed at toppling the regime in Tehran and strategically marginalising Iran is increased by Iran's weakened position and the lack of prospects for a political settlement.
accountThe United States intervened militarily to support Israeli operations targeting Iran's nuclear infrastructure, signaling that the United States was seizing the initiative in the conflict.
accountActions undertaken by Israel during the Twelve-Day War aimed at causing state failure in Iran included eliminating key figures, targeting internal security institutions, carrying out disinformation campaigns, and providing support for exiled opposition groups.
accountIran responded to Israeli and US military actions by launching drone and missile attacks on targets in Israel and on a US military base in Qatar.
claimIsrael's strategic objectives during the Twelve-Day War included destroying Iran's nuclear programme, dismantling its defensive capabilities, paralysing its state institutions, and toppling its regime.
claimUS President Donald Trump reiterated a commitment to seeking a political resolution to the crisis and achieving a full normalization of relations with Iran during a speech in Israel’s Knesset.
accountDuring the Twelve-Day War, Iran conducted a large-scale wave of arrests targeting individuals accused of collaborating with Israel or organizing public protests.
claimIn the event of another attack, Iran would likely retaliate with air strikes on Israeli territory and broader actions in the Middle East targeting Western interests, specifically those of the United States and the European Union.
claimIsrael may take actions to escalate operations against Iran independently of the United States and in the face of opposition from other regional states, without the ambition to shape a stable new order in Iran.
perspectiveIsrael views the current circumstances as a unique window of opportunity to eliminate Iran as a regional actor and will likely seek a pretext, such as neutralizing the Iranian nuclear threat or responding to alleged Iranian violations, to launch a direct attack or escalate sabotage and hybrid operations.
Beyond Missile Deterrence: The Rise of Algorithmic Superiority trendsresearch.org 22 facts
referenceThe article 'U.S.–Israeli Strikes on Iran: Use of Drones and AI' published in the ETC Journal on March 2, 2026, discusses the integration of artificial intelligence and drone technology in military operations against Iran.
referenceRed Analysis published an assessment on June 30, 2025, examining the intersection of the Israel–Iran war and artificial intelligence.
referenceThe report 'Digitally-Enabled Warfare: The Capability–Vulnerability Paradox' was published by the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) in 2017.
claimIran maintains that its nuclear activities are for peaceful energy purposes, whereas Israel and the United States view the program as a potential step toward nuclear weapons and an existential or serious strategic threat.
claimIn confrontations between Iran, Israel, and the United States, artificial intelligence has produced machine-speed engagements in air and missile defense, swarm drone operations, and algorithmic targeting, where humans supervise rather than directly control every action.
referenceThe article 'Tomahawks, Bunker-Busters and Ballistic Missiles: Weapons Driving the Israel–Iran War' was published by The Times of India on February 27, 2026.
referenceTRENDS Research & Advisory published insights on August 25, 2025, regarding the evolution of asymmetric cyber warfare, specifically drawing lessons from the 2025 Israel–Iran conflict.
claimThe integration of AI-driven systems into the Iran-Israel-United States conflict introduces risks of misunderstanding, accidental escalation, and loss of human control, which raises concerns regarding stability, norms, and accountability.
claimThe interaction between Iran, Israel, and the United States demonstrates that artificial intelligence amplifies both state power and systemic risk by enabling faster operations while simultaneously creating new channels for escalation and governance challenges.
referenceThe Pacific Forum published the article 'Leveling the Battlefield: AI-Enabled Technology in the Hands of Non-State Actors' in 2024.
referenceThe research paper 'Beyond Missile Deterrence: The Rise of Algorithmic Superiority' explores how artificial intelligence is changing the character of regional conflicts and influencing the balance of power, specifically focusing on the triangular relationship between Iran, Israel, and the United States.
claimIran, Israel, and the United States utilize AI and digital technologies to manage escalation, project influence, and pursue strategic goals in their ongoing conflict.
accountThe Stuxnet operation, a joint U.S.-Israeli effort, targeted Iran's Natanz nuclear facility around 2009–2010 by using sophisticated malware to infiltrate Siemens programmable logic controllers (PLCs) that controlled Iran's IR-1 centrifuges.
claimThe conflict involving Iran, Israel, and the United States is characterized as a 'shadow war' defined by covert operations, proxy battles, and occasional direct confrontations, making it difficult to distinguish between peace and open conflict.
claimThe Israel–Iran conflict in 2025 involved the deployment of AI-driven disinformation campaigns, as reported by BBC News on June 20, 2025.
referenceThe publication 'Algorithmic Targeting in the Iranian–Israeli Confrontation: Technical Realities, Legal Thresholds, and the Boundaries of Human Control' in F1000Research (2025) examines the technical and legal implications of using algorithmic targeting systems in the conflict between Iran and Israel.
claimIsrael and the United States aim to prevent Iran from becoming a regional power to protect Israel's security, weaken U.S. partners, and reshape the regional balance of power.
claimArtificial intelligence has evolved from a supporting tool into a central strategic element in regional conflicts, particularly within the relationship between Iran, Israel, and the United States.
claimIran relies on drones, regional proxies, and cyber intrusions to monitor United States and Israeli positions while attempting to evade or overwhelm surveillance networks.
claimIsrael and the United States have conducted covert and overt actions, including cyberattacks, targeted killings of nuclear scientists, and strikes on nuclear and military sites, to disrupt Iran's nuclear progress.
claimAI-assisted disinformation is utilized in regional disputes, such as the conflict between Iran and Israel, to shape domestic and international perceptions, undermine the credibility of opponents, and influence how states calculate risks and resolve conflicts.
referenceA 2025 study published in F1000Research (Volume 14, Article 1200) analyzed algorithmic targeting during the Iranian–Israeli confrontation, covering technical realities, legal thresholds, and human control boundaries.
Miscellanea: The War in Iran - A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry acoup.blog 21 facts
measurementThe war has resulted in the deaths of 13 American soldiers, 290 American soldiers wounded in action, 24 Israeli deaths, thousands of Israeli injuries, at least 1,000 civilian deaths in neutral countries (including Lebanon, Kuwait, Iraq, Qatar, Bahrain, and Saudi Arabia), and at least 1,000 Iranian civilian deaths plus Iranian military losses.
perspectiveIsrael's objective in the war with Iran was to collapse the Iranian regime without necessarily installing a replacement government.
perspectiveThe author argues that the war in Iran is a strategic misfire for both the United States and Israel, potentially imperiling the US-Israeli security partnership upon which Israel's security and economic prosperity depend.
accountIn the weeks following the June 22, 2025, attack, explosions occurring within Iran have resulted in initial confusion regarding whether the United States or Israel was responsible for the strikes.
perspectiveCreating conditions where a junior partner in a security relationship can unilaterally force a senior partner into a major conflict is a significant strategic error, as it allows the junior partner to dictate the timing of a war regardless of the senior partner's interests.
claimA war in which Israel defeats Iran in 2026 but faces diplomatic isolation by 2029 would constitute a pyrrhic victory for Israel.
claimMarco Rubio and other Trump administration officials claimed the decision to attempt regime change in Iran was made because they assessed that Israel was about to launch decapitation strikes, and that Iran would blame the United States for the resulting 'blowback' against American assets and energy production.
claimFollowing the June 2025 bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities by the Trump administration, Iran assumed that any Israeli air attack was likely also an American air attack, an assessment that American intelligence reportedly shared.
claimThe United States' June 22, 2025, attack on Iranian nuclear facilities created a strategic situation where Iran would interpret any future Israeli attacks as likely involving the United States, as the party being attacked cannot easily distinguish the origin of the strike.
claimThe Iranian people suffer the most from the war between Iran and the United States/Israel, despite having no choice in the matter.
perspectiveIran uses high energy prices as a lever to pressure the United States and Israel to cease military actions against Iran.
claimThe Trump administration initiated the war in Iran partly due to pressure from Israel and partly based on the assumption that the Iranian regime would collapse, similar to the regime-change scenario in Venezuela.
accountDuring the 'Twelve-Day War' in 2025, Iran did not treat the United States as a co-belligerent, even while American aircraft were actively intercepting Iranian missiles aimed at Israel.
claimThe Trump administration's bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities in June 2025 created a strategic situation where Israel could unilaterally force the United States into a war with Iran by launching a renewed air campaign.
perspectiveThe author argues that the interests of the United States and Israel regarding the outcome of the Iranian regime collapse diverged significantly, and the United States administration may not have understood this divergence.
claimThe JCPOA allowed Iran to reinforce its network of proxies across the Middle East, which negatively impacted the interests of Israel and the United States.
claimIran possesses weapons capable of reaching Israel, but lacks the capability to directly strike the United States mainland.
accountOn June 22, 2025, the United States executed a 'bolt from the blue' surprise attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities, catching Iran by surprise while the country was attempting to negotiate with the United States.
perspectiveThe author believes that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is playing an extremely short-term political game by encouraging the war in Iran, and that Israel may eventually regret this decision.
claimThe United States, Iran, Israel, the Gulf states, and the global energy-consuming community are all poorer, more vulnerable, and more resource-precarious as a result of the war.
claimReports suggest that Israel may attempt to disrupt any ceasefire deal between the United States and Iran if the terms are perceived as too favorable to Iran.
The Limits of Iran's Proxy Empire | The New Yorker newyorker.com 21 facts
claimAbdul Malik al-Houthi expressed complete solidarity with Iran and urged the Muslim world to apply pressure on the United States and Israel.
accountOn February 28th, Abdul Malik al-Houthi, the supreme leader of the Houthi movement in Yemen, denounced U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran as a criminal act and expressed complete solidarity with Iran.
claimMansour stated that because Iran is now engaged in a direct fight against the United States and Israel, its allied proxy groups are becoming less necessary.
accountOn February 28th, Abdul Malik al-Houthi, the supreme leader of the Houthi movement in Yemen, gave a speech denouncing the United States and Israel for striking Iran, describing the attacks as a "blatant, criminal, and barbaric act targeting the Muslim Iranian people."
accountDuring the 'Twelve-Day War' in June, Israel attacked Iran, and the United States subsequently joined the conflict by striking Iranian nuclear facilities.
claimThe Houthis could execute a joint pincer movement with Iran by firing long-range missiles at Israel and targeting the oil, energy, and economic infrastructure of Saudi Arabia and other Persian Gulf nations from the south, while Iran strikes those same countries from the north.
claimThe Houthis remain valuable to Iran during the current conflict because the group has repeatedly demonstrated an ability to withstand strikes from the United States and Israel.
perspectiveNagi of the International Crisis Group stated that the Houthi movement is concerned about their future status, fearing they could become targets of the U.S. and Israel or face harsher sanctions if Iran's regime is weakened or collapses.
claimAll of Iran’s proxy groups share a deep ideological hatred of Israel and America.
perspectiveThe Houthi movement's recent buildup of defenses is likely intended to prevent Israel and the United States from killing their supreme leader, Abdul Malik al-Houthi, rather than to prepare for supporting Iran.
claimMansour stated that because Iran is now engaged in a direct fight against the U.S. and Israel, its allied proxy groups are becoming less necessary.
claimThe Houthis' recent buildup of defenses is likely intended to prevent the U.S. and Israel from targeting their supreme leader, Abdul Malik al-Houthi, rather than to prepare for supporting Iran.
claimIsraeli strikes in Syria killed senior commanders of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which crippled Iran's coordination and control capabilities.
claimIsrael's intelligence apparatus infiltrated Iran, killing top security officials and nuclear scientists located at high-security military complexes.
claimThe Twelve-Day War demonstrated U.S. and Israeli military supremacy and highlighted the infiltration of Iran by Israeli intelligence, which killed top security officials and nuclear scientists housed at high-security military complexes.
perspectiveMansour stated that because Iran is now engaged in a direct fight against the United States and Israel, its allied proxy groups are becoming less necessary.
accountThe Axis of Resistance coalition began with the establishment of Hezbollah in 1982, which Iran helped create in response to Israel’s invasion of Lebanon.
claimDuring the 'Twelve-Day War' in June, Iran's proxies remained largely on the sidelines because they were concerned about surviving U.S. and Israeli retaliation, their own missile and drone stockpiles, domestic stability, and potential political or economic gains from avoiding conflict.
accountIsrael's intelligence apparatus infiltrated Iran, killing top security officials and nuclear scientists who were housed at high-security military complexes.
claimAll of Iran’s proxy groups share a deep ideological hatred of Israel and the United States.
claimThe Houthis are concerned about their long-term security and potential future targeting by the United States and Israel, particularly if Iran becomes significantly weakened or its regime collapses.
United States and Iran on the Brink: What's at Stake? - CSIS csis.org 18 facts
claimThere is an ongoing effort among the United States, Israel, and other regional partners to unify their diplomatic stance to prevent Iranian decision-makers from exploiting divisions in their relationships.
claimIsrael argues that any negotiating process between the United States and Iran must address the Iranian nuclear program, ballistic missiles, and malign regional activities to avoid being considered a 'faulty deal.'
perspectiveIsrael views the threat from Iran as existential because Iranian ideology explicitly calls for the destruction of Israel.
perspectiveThe speaker suggests that Iran calculated that a massive retaliation against the United States might be strategically advantageous compared to a limited conflict, based on the belief that Israel would struggle to sustain a war beyond two weeks.
perspectiveThe speaker argues that Iran believes a larger war is strategically to their advantage, as opposed to the current U.S. and Israeli strategy of escalating, hitting Iran, and then demanding a surrender deal that includes giving up proxies, missiles, and the nuclear program.
perspectiveThe current geopolitical situation is similar to June 2025 in that negotiations are stalled and both Israel and the United States are poised to attack, but it differs because Iran and the region have learned lessons and are playing a different role in averting war.
claimPresident Donald Trump faces pressure from political figures, Israeli officials, and other allies to take military action against Iran, with arguments that it is his only opportunity to demonstrate American strength.
perspectiveIran perceives that threatening Gulf economies is more effective at preventing U.S. military intervention than threatening Israel, because Gulf allies with direct access to President Donald Trump would urge him to avoid war, whereas threats against Israel do not necessarily produce the same diplomatic pressure on Washington.
claimThe United States and Israel are pressuring Iran toward negotiations by 'rattling the saber' and utilizing threats.
claimAmbassador Ratney posits that Iran may perceive a 'use or lose' scenario where they feel compelled to launch military assets quickly against the United States or Israel, fearing that their military capabilities would otherwise be destroyed in a preemptive strike.
claimDr. Nasr asserts that Iran entered negotiations under two primary pressures: the threat of a direct U.S. or Israeli military attack due to the U.S. military armada in the Gulf, and domestic protests driven by U.S. economic sanctions.
claimIranian Revolutionary Guard commanders have threatened to unleash missiles on Israeli cities if Israel attacks Iran directly.
perspectiveFollowing the October 7th attacks, Israel has adopted a policy of preemption at all costs, refusing to tolerate a nuclear Iran or an Iran with significant ballistic missile capabilities.
accountIn June 2025, Israel initiated strikes against Iran, and President Trump intervened by allowing a two-week period for a response, though war occurred two days later.
accountDr. Vali Nasr observes that in previous conflicts, Israel failed to destroy Iran's ballistic missile capabilities despite hitting many launchers, and notes that Iran demonstrated the ability to retaliate within 24 hours even after losing 30 military commanders.
perspectiveSaudi Arabia is nervous about the pressure tactics used by the United States and Israel against Iran because they fear these actions undermine regional stability.
perspectiveDr. Nasr suggests that the Israeli role in the Iran-U.S. situation bears watching because Israel's strategic calculus differs from that of the United States.
perspectiveThe speaker believes that Iran has concluded that symbolic reactions to U.S. or Israeli attacks are counterproductive and that Iran is now motivated to escalate conflict with the United States to avoid being hit repeatedly.
War by Proxy: Iran's Growing Footprint in the Middle East - CSIS csis.org 16 facts
claimThere are indications that Iran may move some of its missiles and missile parts to Iraq to avoid Israeli pressure in Lebanon and Syria.
claimIsraeli leaders have authorized hundreds of military strikes against missile and other targets in Syria over the past few years in response to Iran's expanding presence.
accountIsrael has conducted military strikes against major bases used by Hezbollah, Iran, and other proxy militias in Syria, including T-4 Tiyas Airbase in Homs, the airbase north of al-Qusayr, and Damascus International Airport.
claimThe regional conflict involving Iran includes the war in Yemen, the Houthi use of ballistic missiles against Saudi Arabia, an escalating conflict with Israel in Syria, the growth of Shia militia forces in Iraq, targeted assassinations, and cyberattacks.
claimIsraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated on December 20, 2018, that Israel would increase its efforts against Iranian activities in Syria following the U.S. military withdrawal.
claimIran transferred ballistic missiles to militias in Iraq, which are capable of striking targets in Israel, according to reports from Reuters and the Times of Israel.
claimIsraeli military actions have limited Iranian activity in Syria, including near the Golan Heights.
claimThe regional conflict involving Iran includes the war in Yemen, the Houthi use of ballistic missiles against Saudi Arabia, an escalating conflict with Israel in Syria, the growth of Shia militia forces in Iraq, targeted assassinations, and cyberattacks.
claimThe Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force (IRGC-QF) utilizes a network of proxy groups, satellite imagery of bases in Syria, Lebanon, and Iran, and data on Israeli attacks against targets in Syria to gauge Iranian force posture and regional activities.
quoteIsraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated, "We will continue to aggressively act against Iran’s efforts to entrench in Syria."
claimIsraeli leaders have authorized hundreds of military strikes against missile and other targets in Syria over the past few years in response to Iran's expanding presence there.
accountIsrael has targeted major bases used by Hezbollah, Iran, and other proxy militias, including the T-4 Tiyas Airbase in Homs, the airbase north of al-Qusayr, and Damascus International Airport.
claimIranian activism and the proliferation of Iranian-backed non-state actors have alarmed regional governments, including Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Morocco, facilitating broader regional balancing against Iran.
claimThere are indications that Iran may move some of its missiles and missile parts to Iraq due to Israeli pressure in Lebanon and Syria.
claimNicholas Blanford and Jonathan Spyer reported in 2017 that Israel raised alarms regarding military advances by Hezbollah and Iran.
claimBenjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, stated on December 20, 2018, that Israel would increase its efforts against Iran in Syria following the U.S. military withdrawal.
The Implications Of Iran's Failed Proxy Strategy - Hoover Institution hoover.org 13 facts
claimIran's current military and strategic situation is compared to the failed rhetoric of Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser in the 1960s and Iraq's Saddam Hussein in the 1990s, both of whom vowed to eliminate Israel.
claimAt its height, Iran's proxy network threatened Israel and Saudi Arabia while retaining the capacity to disrupt global trade routes in an arc running from the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea, the Red Sea, and the Eastern Mediterranean.
claimHezbollah has served as Iran's primary proxy, threatening Israel, extending Iran's reach into other regional countries, and helping sustain Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria during the civil war.
perspectiveIran faces pressure to pursue a nuclear weapons program as an alternative means for regime survival, but this strategy risks triggering a massive military response from the United States and Israel.
claimIran's "ring of fire" strategy, which involved a coordinated seven-front approach to overwhelm Israel, has reshaped Israel's national security doctrine.
claimRecent Israeli strikes against Iran demonstrated that Russia and China do not defend Iran against direct military attacks.
claimIsrael's retaliatory strikes destroyed significant portions of Iran's air defenses and ballistic missile production facilities, re-establishing Israeli military dominance lost after the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks.
claimIran conducted direct attacks on Israel on April 13 and October 1, 2024, marking a departure from its traditional reliance on proxy forces.
claimRegime change in Iran has become a central goal of Israeli state policy.
claimIsrael conducted an assassination campaign against leaders of Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) in Lebanon, Syria, and Iran, which restored the reputation of Israeli intelligence services.
claimAyatollah Ali Khamenei, the 85-year-old supreme leader of Iran, remains committed to the revolutionary ideology of Khomeinism, which frames the regime's legitimacy around opposition to Israel and the United States.
claimIran's remaining proxy groups lack the geographical proximity to replace Hezbollah as Iran's primary offensive line along the Israeli border.
claimIran's direct attacks on Israel on April 13 and October 1, 2024, caused minimal damage due to US military support and Israeli missile defense systems.
A Status Quo Power in a Changing Region: Iran's Regionalism in ... cambridge.org 13 facts
accountFollowing the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran became an active regional player by pursuing ideologically driven actions, including opposing Western involvement in Muslim world affairs, supporting the Palestinian cause against Israel, backing Islamist groups across the Arab world, and organizing Shiite movements in the Arab Middle East.
claimThe USA has pursued a policy of excluding Iran by consolidating security relationships with Arab monarchies and Israel to highlight their collective antagonism towards Iran in the Middle East.
accountFollowing the 1979 Islamic Revolution, antagonism towards the USA and Israel introduced new geopolitical fault lines, intensifying Iran's threat perception from neighboring regions.
claimTehran is concerned that the de facto alliance between Israel, Turkey, and Azerbaijan in the South Caucasus mirrors US efforts to contain Iran in the Middle East.
claimIran may utilize the South Caucasus as a new front for its deterrence policy against regional rivals such as Turkey and Israel.
claimIran is concerned that Azerbaijan might be drawn into a 'Balkanization trap' against Iran, with support from Turkey and Israel.
perspectiveIran is concerned that Azerbaijan's strengthening relationships with Turkey and Israel could transform Azerbaijan into a strategic foothold for adversarial powers aiming to extend their influence into northern Iran.
perspectiveTehran perceives Turkey's pan-Turkic ambitions along Iran's northern border as a rising security threat, and believes that Azerbaijan and Turkey's efforts to invoke pan-Turkic sentiments are supported by Israel.
claimThe conflict between Iran and the US-Israeli axis has extended beyond the Arab Middle East, impacting other neighboring regions.
claimThe expanding roles of Turkey and Israel, in partnership with Azerbaijan, have increased Iran's strategic concerns regarding the South Caucasus.
claimTurkey, Israel, and European states are asserting their influence more forcefully in the South Caucasus, contributing to growing complexities for Iran.
claimIran is concerned about Azerbaijan's growing military and strategic relations with Israel, particularly following the war in Gaza, fearing that Israel may seek to retaliate by increasing its activities around Iranian borders, including in the South Caucasus.
claimIran's primary concern regarding Baku's rhetoric is the escalating pan-Turkic ideology promoted by Turkey and Israel, rather than an immediate hard security threat.
Iran internal crisis (2025–present) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org 12 facts
accountThe Iran-Israel war began on 13 June 2025 when Israeli forces targeted Iranian military, nuclear, and government sites and assassinated IRGC leadership.
claimIranian authorities targeted Afghans and ethnic militants during a search for individuals accused of spying for Israel.
claimThe recovery trajectory of the Iranian economy will be more arduous if Israeli strikes damaged refining capacity or disrupted distribution channels for industrial inputs.
claimAP News reported on June 25, 2025, that Iran faces an uncertain future following a grinding war with Israel.
quoteOn 13 June 2025, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the people of Iran, stating: 'The time has come for you to unite around your flag and your historic legacy by standing up for your freedom from an evil and oppressive regime' and 'this is your opportunity to stand up and let your voices be heard'. He further stated: 'Israel's fight is not with you', but that 'our fight is with our common enemy, a murderous regime that both oppresses you and impoverishes you', and concluded by repeating the slogan 'Woman, Life, Freedom' and telling the people of Iran that 'your light will defeat the darkness.'
claimFollowing a 12-day war with Israel in June 2025, the Iranian regime experienced increased internal paranoia and initiated a crackdown on dissent.
claimIn June 2025, the Iranian government's inner circle entered a phase of acute paranoia following initial strikes by Israel.
claimThe Iranian government moved to punish individuals for 'spying' while simultaneously proclaiming victory over Israel and the United States.
accountIran retaliated against Israeli and allied targets with missile and drone barrages, including a strike on a US base in Qatar, during the Iran-Israel war.
measurementIran deported 300,000 Afghan nationals due to fears regarding spying for Israel.
claimInternet blackouts in Iran have created new dangers for civilians during the conflict with Israel and limited the public's access to information.
claimActivists and protesters in Iran claim they have remained quiet, fearful, and confused by the war, expressing anger at both Iran and Israel.
Iran War: Kinetic, Cyber, Electronic and Psychological Warfare ... resecurity.com 11 facts
claimThe United States advised American citizens to immediately leave Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, the United Arab Emirates, and Yemen due to escalating Iranian strikes and planned US retaliatory strikes.
claimIran warned Israel against conducting full-scale military aggression in Lebanon, stating that such actions would lead to an obliterating war.
accountA joint Israel-US military action began in Iran on Saturday, February 28, 2026, with the stated goal of regime change and altering the political map of the Middle East and the global order.
claimIran has conducted retaliatory attacks against sites in Israel, oil refineries, U.S. military bases, airports, and commercial shipping across the six Gulf states.
accountIranian missile and drone attacks have targeted civilian and military infrastructure in Bahrain, Kuwait, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Israel, and Qatar.
claimIran is retaliating against Israel and its Persian Gulf neighbors using ballistic missiles and drone strikes, which are described as larger in scale than military operations that occurred in June.
claimMajor airspace across Iran, Israel, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, and Syria remains challenging, resulting in widespread flight cancellations and diversions.
claimIraq is becoming a new front in the ongoing conflict between Iran and the US/Israel.
claimThe conflict between Iran and the U.S.-Israel coalition has forced importers to implement energy triage, conserving power and attempting to curb rising prices.
measurementTotalEnergies reported a 15% loss in oil and gas output due to the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran causing field closures across the Middle East, including in the UAE, Qatar, and Iraq.
claimIran and its proxies, including Hezbollah, the Houthis, Iraqi militias, and Hamas, are launching retaliatory attacks on Israel, U.S. bases, Gulf states, and commercial shipping.
Iran at a Historical Crossroads - E-International Relations e-ir.info 10 facts
claimThe United States and Israel perceive Iran as weaker today than it has been in decades.
claimIran has supported Hamas as part of the 'resistance axis' against Israel in recent years, despite the ideological difference of Hamas being a Sunni Islamist movement.
claimIran utilizes proxy militias as a cornerstone of its deterrence strategy, positioning loyal forces around Israel and United States interests to threaten indirect retaliation and deter direct attacks on Iran.
accountIn response to Iranian direct missile and drone strikes, Israel destroyed significant portions of Iran's air defenses and ballistic missile production facilities.
referenceIsrael effectively neutralized Iran's non-state actors, which exposed Iran to direct attack.
claimIran faces increased military spending requirements because its proxy groups can no longer effectively shoulder the burden of regional security, necessitating the rebuilding of air defenses and missile sites destroyed by Israel.
claimIsraeli leaders have considered exploiting Iran's tenuous regional position by potentially conducting strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
claimIsraeli attacks on Iranian soil have occurred following the neutralization of Hezbollah and Hamas, demonstrating Iran's increased vulnerability without its proxy buffer.
claimIran utilizes a network of allied militias and proxy forces, collectively known as the Axis of Resistance, to project power and oppose Israel and the United States across Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen.
claimHamas is no longer considered an asset for Iran due to the destruction of its military capabilities and the stricter Israeli security control over Gaza.
Escalation with Iran: Understanding the Regional and Global ... thesoufancenter.org 10 facts
claimIsraeli Defense Minister Israel Katz announced that Ali Larijani, the head of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, and Gholamreza Soleimani, the head of Iran's Basij, are targets of Israel.
claimThe outbreak of war between the United States, Israel, and Iran presents a major geopolitical test for the People's Republic of China.
claimThe war between Iran, the United States, and Israel entered its second week by March 11, 2026, with no clear exit strategy in sight.
claimIran has utilized its coastline on the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz chokepoint as a strategic asset to conduct attacks against the United States and Israel.
claimThe conflict involving Iran, Israel, and the United States evolved into a high-intensity, multi-domain campaign by the fifth day of the war.
claimThe war between Iran and the United States/Israel has entered its third day.
claimThe Russian government warned that 'unprovoked acts of armed aggression' would lead to global and regional instability following the U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28, 2026.
claimUnited States President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have interrupted active diplomacy with Iran to undertake military action against Iran for the second time in eight months.
claimOn March 18, 2026, Israel struck energy production facilities at Iran’s South Pars field, signaling an expansion of the conflict.
claimTwo weeks into the war between the U.S./Israel and Iran, key leadership and infrastructure of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS) have been targeted.
Analysis - The Iran War: Strategic Implications for Israel, the Gulf ... elnetwork.eu 9 facts
claimGulf governments struggle to determine Iran's true strategic intent—whether it is pursuing sustained escalation or limited pressure—due to conflicting messages from different parts of the Iranian system and the impact of Israeli and American strikes on Iranian command and control structures.
claimThe current war between Israel and Iran is a test of the balance of power and a decisive moment in shaping a new regional architecture that will influence Middle Eastern security and European economic and energy stability.
claimIsrael is geographically distant from Iran and may accept or prefer regional instability, whereas Gulf states fear that instability in Iran could undermine their own security and regional stability.
claimA prolonged war or the survival of the Iranian regime could encourage Gulf states to revert to a strategy of balancing among regional powers and reduce the scope of their cooperation with Israel.
claimIranian attacks on civilian infrastructure, airports, and energy facilities across the Gulf are forcing Gulf states to reassess their diplomatic and security relationships with Israel, the United States, and the European Union.
claimThe war underscores for Saudi leadership the importance of regional cooperation in addressing the Iranian threat, while making public progress toward full normalization with Israel more politically difficult due to fears of Iranian retaliation.
claimAn American withdrawal or ambiguity regarding the United States' commitment to Gulf security could encourage regional states to seek new arrangements with Iran, potentially distancing them from cooperation with Israel.
claimIf Iran is perceived as less threatening at the end of the war, the motivation of Gulf states to pursue close security ties with Israel may diminish.
claimThe war with Iran has showcased Israel's advantages in missile defense, early warning systems, and cyber defense, which are capabilities likely to attract interest from Gulf states facing similar threats.
Twenty questions (and expert answers) about the Iran war atlanticcouncil.org 8 facts
claimIran may only accept an off-ramp to a conflict if it ensures there is not another near-term war, which would likely entail compelling the United States to enforce a cease-fire that Israel adheres to.
claimThe United States and Israel initiated a war against Iran on February 28.
claimThe United States and Israel are leading military operations against Iran.
claimIsrael's strikes on oil depots in Tehran and the destruction of cultural heritage sites in the second week of the war caused a shift in mood among the Iranian opposition, leading some to question the cost of a free Iran and the resilience of the regime.
claimIran has ambitions to increase production of ballistic missiles capable of reaching Israel, which Israel views as a strategic threat.
claimThe October 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas would not have occurred without cumulative Iranian involvement.
claimIf Kurdish forces were to take and hold territory in northern Iran, they could create a buffer zone that would be beneficial to Israel and the West.
claimIsrael's strategic objective in the conflict with Iran is the collapse of the Iranian regime, which represents an expansion of the goals held during the June 2025 twelve-day war.
The Deafening Silence of Iran's Proxies - Institute for the Study of War understandingwar.org 7 facts
claimIraqi militias are currently reluctant to engage in the Iran-Israel conflict due to domestic political competition ahead of the November 2025 Iraqi elections.
claimA Gazan individual was the only known fatality resulting from the Iranian missile barrage against Israel in October 2024.
claimThe Iraqi Muqawama (Islamic Resistance in Iraq) demonstrated both cohesion and restraint during the conflict between Israel and Iran, according to an analysis by The Washington Institute.
claimHezbollah served as Iran's primary deterrent against an Israeli strike prior to the Israeli air campaign.
claimIsraeli military operations conducted in response to the Hamas attacks on October 7, 2023, exposed Iran to the current air campaign and unraveled Iran's proxy and partner network.
claimThe Houthis face significant challenges in attacking Israel because the long distances involved allow Israel sufficient time to intercept drones, and Iranian-built missiles have limited capability to penetrate Israeli defenses.
measurementAn Iranian missile barrage against Israel in October 2024 caused between 150 million and 200 million New Israeli Shekels in property damage.
After Khamenei: Regional Reckoning and the Future of Iran's Proxy ... stimson.org 7 facts
claimEfforts to establish a sustainable detente between Iran and Gulf countries have been hindered by mutual mistrust regarding Iranian expansionist objectives and Gulf countries' relations with Israel and the United States, as well as Iran's continued support for Hezbollah and the Yemeni Houthis.
claimIn 2024, Iran's regional power projection suffered setbacks with the loss of the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad to Turkish-backed Sunni Muslim forces and the assassination of Hezbollah secretary general Hassan Nasrallah by Israel.
accountIn 2024, Iran's power projection capabilities suffered setbacks with the fall of the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad to Turkish-backed Sunni Muslim forces and the assassination of Hezbollah secretary general Hassan Nasrallah by Israel.
accountHezbollah launched missiles and drones against northern Israel on March 2, which dragged Lebanon into the conflict on Iran's side.
claimThe rapprochement between Iran and Gulf countries failed to translate into sustainable detente due to mutual mistrust regarding Iranian expansionist objectives and Gulf countries' relations with Israel and the United States, as well as Iran's continued support for Hezbollah and the Yemeni Houthis.
claimGulf states are currently reluctant to join US-Israeli attacks against Iran and hope to see the hostilities end as quickly as possible.
claimGulf states are reluctant to join US-Israeli attacks against Iran in the short term, hoping to end hostilities quickly, but may join the war if Iranian attacks on their territories continue.
Geopolitical, economic and humanitarian implications of the 2026 ... middleeastmonitor.com 7 facts
perspectiveThe author argues that the 2026 conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran is a transformative event likely to reshape global energy markets, intensify geopolitical rivalries, and deepen humanitarian crises.
measurementOil prices surged from approximately $70 to over $110 per barrel during the February 2026 conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran, according to Al Jazeera (2026).
claimHealthcare systems in regions affected by the 2026 US-Israel-Iran conflict are under strain due to shortages of medical supplies and personnel.
claimThe 2026 US-Israel-Iran conflict is likely to reshape the Middle East's balance of power, potentially leading to a decline in Iranian regional influence and a consolidation of Israeli military dominance.
claimSome Arab states may strengthen ties with the United States and Israel in response to perceived Iranian threats, potentially redefining the region's geopolitical architecture.
claimThe escalation of hostilities between the United States, Israel, and Iran in February 2026 represents a significant geopolitical crisis that evolved from targeted military operations into a wider regional confrontation.
referenceThe United States and Israel have perceived Iran’s nuclear ambitions as a direct threat to international security for decades, according to the Council on Foreign Relations (2026).
Geopolitical, Strategic, and Humanitarian Implications of ... ardd-jo.org 7 facts
claimMissile interceptor stockpiles are reportedly depleting, which could expose Israel and Gulf states to greater damage if Iran escalates the conflict.
perspectiveThe author believes that a declared U.S. victory is becoming very difficult because Iran may continue to inflict harm on the United States and Israel even if the United States attempts to halt the war, leading to re-escalation.
claimDuring the June 2025 war, the United States and Israel operated with diverging objectives: the United States sought primarily to dismantle Iran’s nuclear program, while Israel aimed to eliminate Iran’s capacity to pose any strategic threat, including its nuclear capabilities, weapons infrastructure, and the regime itself.
claimThe geopolitical dynamic between Israel, the United States, and Iran has shifted from indirect confrontation toward direct military engagement.
claimIsrael has promoted a narrative that the June 2025 military campaign was unfinished business and that Iran poses an immediate, unresolved threat.
claimThe geopolitical dynamic between Israel, the United States, and Iran has shifted from indirect confrontation toward direct military engagement, while expanding military operations in Lebanon and Gaza have increased the risk of a wider war.
claimIsrael has intensified military operations in Lebanon to pursue its broader regional objectives, expanding the conflict beyond Iran.
Iran's 'Axis of Resistance': The proxy forces shaping Mideast conflicts latimes.com 6 facts
accountPresident Donald Trump announced a joint U.S.-Israeli attack on Iran, citing the Islamic Republic's regional proxies as a primary justification.
accountHezbollah emerged from the chaos of the Lebanese Civil War (1975-90) and in opposition to Israel’s 1982 invasion of Lebanon and its subsequent 18-year occupation of southern Lebanon, with patronage from Iran.
claimThe alliance between Iran and Hamas is driven by a shared opposition to Israel, despite Iran being Shiite and Hamas being Sunni.
perspectiveIran and its proxies accuse Israel of conducting a campaign of mass murder, persecution, and ethnic cleansing against indigenous Palestinians, charges that Israel rejects.
claimAyatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran, has maintained a stance of enmity toward the United States and Israel for over three decades.
accountHamas did not receive large-scale aid from Iran until the 1990s, and Israel provided early support to the group as a counterweight to the Palestine Liberation Organization, according to Israeli press accounts.
Military escalation and diverging regional strategies in the Middle East theloop.ecpr.eu 6 facts
perspectiveIsrael is attempting to exploit a temporary strategic window to permanently reshape the regional security balance in its favor by toppling the Iranian regime.
claimIran relies on asymmetric military capabilities rather than conventional military capabilities because it cannot match the combined power of the United States and Israel.
claimUnited States and Israeli air strikes on Iran’s nuclear, missile, and oil facilities are intended to weaken the Iranian regime.
claimThe United States and Israel hope that air strikes on Iran will reignite protests across Iran with greater intensity, creating internal pressure while Iran struggles to maintain deterrence.
claimIran recognizes that its conventional military capabilities are inferior to the combined power of the United States and Israel.
claimUS-Israeli air strikes on Iran’s nuclear, missile, and oil facilities are intended to weaken the Iranian regime and reignite internal protests across Iran.
The crises in the Middle East: reshaping the region's geopolitical ... link.springer.com 5 facts
claimThe Middle East is currently on the edge of a direct war between regional powers, specifically Iran and Israel.
claimThe emergence of Turkey, Iran, and Israel as new middle power centers has introduced additional complexity to managing the balance of power between regional actors in the Middle East.
claimIran maintains a stance on Palestinian resistance against Israel that is as strong or stronger than that of Saudi Arabia and Turkey.
claimThe escalation of conflict between Israel and both Hamas and Hezbollah, along with the potential for a direct war between Iran and Israel, has impacted the United States' plans to withdraw military forces from the region.
referenceGawdat Bahgat authored the article 'Israel and Iran in the New Middle East', published in Contemporary Security Policy in 2006, volume 27, issue 3, pages 363–375.
Managed Stability or Systemic Reform: Iran's Options After the 12 ... valdaiclub.com 5 facts
claimThe use of pre-Islamic iconography in Iranian state messaging has increased significantly since the start of the war between Iran and Israel.
claimThe trajectory of socio-political reforms in Iran is dependent on external factors, including the risk of war with Israel, relations with the United States, and the impact of sanctions.
claimIran's complex relations with the United States and Israel, characterized by Iranian doubt regarding the sustainability of agreements, exacerbate the risks associated with political reform.
claimThe reformist scenario in Iran, which entails strengthening the reformist wing and revising state ideology, poses a threat to the existing political system and the country as a whole, with risks exacerbated by Iran's complex relations with the United States and Israel.
claimThe dynamics of potential socio-political reforms in Iran are dependent on the external environment, specifically the risk of a new war with Israel, the nature of relations with the United States, and the impact of possible sanctions.
After the War: Rethinking Regional Security in the Middle ... arab-reform.net 5 facts
accountThe United States and Israel attacked Iran despite reservations expressed by Gulf countries, and the United States provided limited support to Gulf countries when Iran began attacking them.
claimArab states have historically attempted to maintain security by outsourcing it to Washington, establishing tacit understandings with Israel, or pursuing temporary de-escalations and accommodations with Iran.
perspectiveThe proposed regional security pact aims to contain confrontation by opposing Israeli military aggressiveness, stopping Iranian externalization strategies, reducing intra-regional rivalries, supporting a just outcome for Palestinians, and increasing collective agency against U.S.-China competition and global multipolarity.
claimGulf countries face security threats from both Iran and Israel.
claimThe Iranian regime appears on track to survive current attacks by the United States and Israel but will likely emerge sanctioned and domestically insecure.
The Middle East Conflict and the Future of the Region's Political Order internationalaffairs.org.au 5 facts
perspectiveUnderstanding the potential trajectories of the current crisis between the United States, Israel, and Iran requires attention to two interconnected levels of analysis: regional and global geopolitical competition, and Iran’s internal political and social structures.
measurementAccording to Al Jazeera, at least 1,255 people have been killed in Iran since the United States and Israel launched coordinated strikes on 28 February 2026, with many victims reported as civilians.
perspectiveA rapid end to the current crisis between the United States, Israel, and Iran appears relatively unlikely.
claimThe escalation of the conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran has raised the geopolitical question of whether the crisis will remain a limited confrontation or evolve into a prolonged and exhausting conflict.
measurementEight U.S. soldiers and several additional individuals in Gulf states have been reported killed as the conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran has spread across the region.
Iran's Proxy Strategy and the Extent of Surrogate Autonomy - AHS alexanderhamiltonsociety.org 5 facts
claimThe relationship between Iran and the Houthi movement (Ansar Allah) has evolved into a collaborative partnership, characterized by Houthi attacks on Saudi and Western targets and the adoption of Iranian anti-Israel rhetoric.
perspectiveThe United States should continue to support the targeting of Iranian logistic chains that supply weapons to Hezbollah, which are primarily executed by Israel.
claimHezbollah's operations against Israel represent Iran's opposition to Zionism and Western imperialism, while Iran's support for regional rebel groups aligns with its commitment to support the downtrodden in the Islamic community.
perspectiveIsrael views Qatar's replacement of Iran as a mediator in Gaza as a positive geostrategic shift.
claimThe Ansar Allah movement's global principles, including opposition to the United States and Israel, align with Iranian strategic interests and political ideologies.
How Will Cyber Warfare Shape the U.S.-Israel Conflict with Iran? csis.org 4 facts
measurementAccording to a Radware report, cyberattacks targeting Israel increased by 700 percent following Israeli military strikes in Iran in 2025.
accountIsrael integrated cyber and influence operations during its air campaign against Iran by hacking the BadeSaba prayer app to inflame anti-regime sentiment and sow confusion.
accountThe United States and Israel launched a large-scale kinetic and cyber operation against Iran on February 28, referred to as Operation Epic Fury, to weaken the Iranian regime's military and strategic capabilities.
accountDuring the U.S. and Israeli airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and strategic government sites, cyber intrusions were used to post anti-regime messages on the front page of the Iranian state-run news agency IRNA.
Power Transition in the Middle East: The Intersection of US Global ... populismstudies.org 4 facts
claimThe Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) condemned Israeli attacks on Iran, a stance that coexists with muted and ambivalent official reactions from Gulf states.
claimThe Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) issued a strong condemnation of Israeli attacks on Iran in 2026.
claimThe House of Commons Library published a research briefing titled 'US-Israel strikes on Iran: February/March 2026' on March 2, 2026.
claimThe European Union's muted stance on the Iran-Israel crisis is a result of leadership gaps, a lack of a shared perspective within the Union, and a reliance on Cold War-era habits of outsourcing hard security to the United States.
The Expanding Iran War - ISPI ispionline.it 4 facts
claimSince the February 28 attack, almost every country in the Middle East has been hit by either the US-Israeli coalition or Iranian forces, resulting in casualties and significant damage.
accountFollowing the 2024 collapse of the Assad regime, Iran and Israel exacerbated sectarian strife inside Syria, making the country vulnerable to becoming an arena for proxy conflict during the 12-day war of 2025.
claimThe conflict between Iran and the US-Israeli coalition has caused disruptions to global supply chains due to attacks on logistical hubs, oil fields, refineries, and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
claimRory Miller suggests that Iranian attacks may contribute to rising energy prices and economic impacts that could force the United States to shorten its military campaign and restrain Israeli ambitions.
Iran's Regional Armed Network - Council on Foreign Relations cfr.org 4 facts
claimIran's network of armed partners, including Hezbollah and the Houthis, serves to strengthen Iranian influence in the Middle East and poses a significant threat to the United States and its allies, particularly Israel.
claimHamas's October 2023 assault on Israel showed signs of coordination with Iran.
accountDuring Iran's first direct attack on Israeli soil in April 2024, Iranian partners in Iraq, Lebanon, and Yemen launched drones and rockets at Israel to support Tehran's air strikes.
accountDuring Iran's first-ever direct attack on Israeli soil in April 2024, Iranian partners in Iraq, Lebanon, and Yemen launched drones and rockets at Israel to support Tehran's air strikes.
The path forward on Iran and its proxy forces - Brookings Institution brookings.edu 4 facts
perspectiveAyatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran, maintains a stance of antagonism toward the United States and Israel, viewing the United States as immoral and Israel as an illegitimate state that should be destroyed.
claimFollowing the October 7 attacks, Iran’s network of proxies increased hostile activity targeting Israel and the United States presence in the region.
claimThe October 7 attacks and the subsequent war in Gaza have served several Iranian objectives: elevating Tehran’s regional stature, emboldening its proxy network, blocking normalization efforts between Israel and Saudi Arabia, and weakening Israel.
perspectiveIranian leaders view the creation of chaos and pressure on Israel and the United States as a victory, as they do not need to achieve specific objectives to benefit from regional aggression.
Iran Country Report 2026 - BTI Transformation Index bti-project.org 4 facts
claimIran experienced a direct attack on its territory by another state for the first time since the end of the Iran-Iraq War in 1988, marking a dramatic escalation in the conflict with Israel.
claimThe prospect of further escalation of tensions with Israel weighs on the stability of Iran.
claimIran maintains an existential-ideological animosity toward Israel, which nearly resulted in a larger war between the two nations in 2024.
claimIran remains under stringent international sanctions due to its ideological hostility toward the West, specifically Israel and the United States.
War in the Middle East and the Role of AI-Powered Cyberattacks manaramagazine.org 4 facts
claimCybersecurity analysts reported a series of digital incidents linked to the Israel–Iran confrontation in early March 2026.
claimThe conflict involving Israel, the United States, and Iran, with Gulf states involved, may be remembered as the moment when AI-powered cyberwar became a permanent feature of global conflict.
claimThe conflict involving Israel, the United States, and Iran, with Gulf states involved, is characterized by the author as a potential turning point where AI-powered cyberwar becomes a permanent feature of global conflict, alongside traditional military assets like missiles and drones.
claimIran-linked hackers have targeted IP cameras across Israel and Gulf states to gather military intelligence, according to a report by Security Affairs published on March 7, 2026.
How China and Russia View the Iran War Differently isdp.eu 4 facts
claimThe escalation between Iran and Israel has exposed the strategic instincts of external powers seeking to influence the crisis without assuming responsibility for its consequences.
claimChina maintains a strategy of simultaneous engagement with Iran, Israel, and the Gulf monarchies to remain economically embedded across rival blocs.
claimThe conflict between Iran and Israel is no longer a bilateral confrontation due to the crossing of borders by missiles and the activation of proxy networks across multiple theaters.
claimChina and Russia both oppose Western dominance, criticize Israeli military actions, and maintain close ties with Iran.
Monday Briefing: Israel-Hamas war: Conflict scenarios, ... mei.edu 3 facts
claimThe United States deployed two aircraft carriers to the eastern Mediterranean primarily as a deterrence message to Iran and Hezbollah to prevent the expansion of the conflict beyond the Gaza-Israel theater.
claimAccording to media reports, Iran has communicated to Israel that it intends to join the war directly if Israel proceeds with a ground invasion of Gaza.
claimThe United States deployed two carrier strike groups to the eastern Mediterranean to demonstrate support for Israel and to deter Iran and Hezbollah from escalating the conflict.
Editorials Supporting an Iran Nuclear Deal, January - September 2015 armscontrol.org 3 facts
claimThe Buffalo News asserts that failing to reach an agreement with Iran guarantees that Iran will continue to seek nuclear weapons, which could ignite a war as the United States and Israel attempt to prevent Iran from achieving nuclear capability.
quoteCritics have offered no alternative other than a Middle East nuclear arms race among Iran and its rival Sunni states and Israel, and the prospect of a massive regional war. The agreement is realistic, more akin to President Richard Nixon’s outreach to China more than 40 years ago than to appeasement. China remains, in many ways, an adversary. But it is part of the global community and less dangerous than it might have been in isolation. The same prospect now arises relative to Iran.
perspectiveUSA Today's editorial board stated on February 1, 2015, that the six nations negotiating with Iran have maintained remarkable unity throughout the talks, and that political gamesmanship in the United States or Israel threatens to undermine these efforts.
The Axis of Instability: Iran, Proxy Warfare, and the Fragmenting ... meforum.org 3 facts
perspectiveIsrael argues that Iran's nuclear ambition, missile buildup, and proxy militarization function together as an integrated threat matrix.
claimArab states are articulating sovereign interests that conflict with Iran's regional posture, which contradicts the narrative that concerns about Iran are limited to Israel or the United States.
perspectiveIsrael holds the view that regional stability is impossible while Iranian-backed armed governance structures remain intact.
Escalation in the Middle East and Beyond unocha.org 3 facts
measurementBetween 28 February and 25 March, 18 civilians were killed and over 4,900 were injured, including 715 children, in Israel due to strikes by Iranian and non-state armed groups, according to official figures.
measurementApproximately 4,900 people in 41 municipalities in Israel are reported to be displaced due to complete damage to their houses resulting from strikes by Iranian and non-state-armed groups.
claimStrikes by the United States and Israel in Iran have affected 190 districts across 20 provinces, causing damage to homes, health care facilities, schools, and a water desalination plant.
Deterrence and Escalation Dynamics with Iran: Insights from Four ... washingtoninstitute.org 3 facts
referenceMilitary expert Michael Eisenstadt reviews recent conflicts involving the United States, Israel, Iran, and Iranian proxies to analyze the Islamic Republic's historical approach to deterrence and escalation management.
claimThe twelve-day conflict in June 2025 between the United States, Israel, and Iran contradicted predictions that a U.S. attack on Iran would result in massive retaliation, thousands of American casualties, and an all-out regional war.
claimThe conflict in June 2025 between the United States, Israel, and Iran challenged previous assumptions regarding the ability of the United States and Israel to manage escalation with the Iranian regime.
A Region at Capacity: War, Displacement, and the Limits of ... mecouncil.org 3 facts
claimThe conflict between Israel and Iran creates humanitarian pressures requiring Gulf countries, Iraq, and Jordan to provide food, shelter, and basic necessities to affected populations and support to businesses impacted by economic slowdowns.
claimThe war involving Israel, the United States, and Iran highlights the fragility of the humanitarian landscape in the Middle East.
claimThe conflict between Israel, the United States, and Iran may adversely affect the position of Gulf countries, potentially forcing them to recalibrate their regional roles.
How active have Iran's proxy groups been since the start of the war? theconversation.com 2 facts
perspectiveNadwa al-Dawsari of the Middle East Institute suggests that Iran may be holding Houthi intervention in reserve, potentially to use long-range missile and drone attacks against Gulf states and Israel later in the conflict.
claimHezbollah launched rockets, missiles, and drones at Israel starting March 2, 2025, in response to the killing of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in an Israeli airstrike.
How the War in Iran Is Shaping Gulf Collective Consciousness mecouncil.org 2 facts
claimGulf public opinion experiences cognitive dissonance between value-based rejection of Israeli policies due to solidarity with Palestinians and existential anxiety regarding Iranian policies encroaching on Arab Gulf states' vital interests.
claimGulf societies are experiencing a complex state of anxiety and emotional vigilance due to the Israeli-U.S. war on Iran.
Climate Shocks Are Redefining Energy Security energypolicy.columbia.edu 2 facts
Iran's Global Posture Hides Domestic Insecurities carnegieendowment.org 2 facts
claimSeveral Arab countries have sought accommodation with Iran regarding trade, pilgrimage, and maritime security while simultaneously pursuing normalization with Israel under the Abraham Accords.
claimIran collaborates with regional groups including Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, the Badr Organization and Kataib Hezbollah in Iraq, and the Houthis in Yemen, based on shared enmity toward Israel and the United States.
Escalating Middle East Conflict and Its Global Geostrategic ... diplomatmagazine.eu 2 facts
perspectiveFrom the Iranian perspective, the country is engaged in defensive measures against Israeli and American military pressure in the region, and its conflict is with policies and military actions rather than the American people.
perspectiveIranian military officials claim that their operations targeted important Israeli military and administrative facilities as a defensive response to aggression.
Resecurity warns that Iran war enters multi-domain phase as cyber ... industrialcyber.co 2 facts
claimThe group Server Killers, described by a Telegram channel as Russian-speaking, has joined the cyber war against the United States and Israel, though Resecurity assesses their activity as opportunistic rather than state-directed and their claims of providing substantial support to Iran as exaggerated.
accountThe joint U.S.–Israeli offensive against Iran on February 28, 2026, involved both kinetic strikes and a surge in cyber and electronic activities designed to disrupt communications, gather intelligence, and degrade Iranian command networks.
Three Scenarios for the Middle East Crisis, and How to Prepare for ... supplychainbrain.com 2 facts
claimThe 'conflict de-escalation' scenario would involve the United States ceasing direct involvement in attacks after claiming objectives are met, Israel scaling back and halting strikes, and a damaged Iran becoming unable to sustain the intensity of military operations.
claimThe 'significant escalation' scenario involves an intensifying U.S.-Israeli campaign to destroy Iran's military capability, with Israel pursuing broader security objectives in Lebanon and elsewhere, while pressure increases on Persian Gulf states and groups like the Houthis in Yemen and Hezbollah in Lebanon threaten to expand the conflict to the Red Sea and eastern Mediterranean.
A “Good Deal” with Iran? Requirements for Preventing a Future ... washingtoninstitute.org 2 facts
claimIran's direct ballistic missile attacks against Israeli civilian populations demonstrate that the Iranian missile program functions as an operational instrument of military and political coercion rather than just a theoretical adjunct to nuclear ambitions.
claimIran preserved vital nuclear know-how, developed advanced centrifuges for faster uranium enrichment, and maintained future breakout options despite U.S. and Israeli military strikes against its nuclear infrastructure.
How the war in Ukraine changed Russia's global standing | Brookings brookings.edu 1 fact
claimPrior to the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Russia had established itself as a regional player in the Middle East capable of maintaining diplomatic communication with Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the Gulf states, Iran, and Israel.
War in Ukraine | Global Conflict Tracker - Council on Foreign Relations cfr.org 1 fact
claimUkraine agreed to reopen a damaged pipeline that transports Russian fuel to Hungary and Slovakia in response to a global energy crunch caused by the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran.
Media Coverage - News Center - Baruch College newscenter.baruch.cuny.edu 1 fact
claimCarla Anne Robbins contributed to a Chicago Council on Global Affairs report covering the US-Russia prisoner swap, Israel's strikes on Iran and Lebanon, and Venezuela’s election fallout on August 2, 2024.
Why Epstein's Links to the CIA Are So Important | The Nation thenation.com 1 fact
claimBranko Marcetic of Jacobin summarized reporting indicating that Jeffrey Epstein hosted an Israeli military intelligence officer, worked with Ehud Barak to influence actions against Iran and Syria, and brokered security agreements between Israel and the nations of Mongolia and Côte d’Ivoire.
Strategic analysis of cyber conflicts: A game-theoretic modelling of ... securityanddefence.pl 1 fact
accountThe 2010 Stuxnet attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities is a landmark event in cyber conflict, involving a sophisticated cyber weapon allegedly developed by the United States and Israel to target industrial control systems in Iran’s uranium-enrichment facilities (Farwell and Rohozinski, 2011).
From FOIAs to planes, Jeffrey Epstein's brushes with the CIA sashaingber.substack.com 1 fact
claimFormer Norwegian diplomat Terje Rod-Larsen regularly emailed Jeffrey Epstein with links to articles concerning the CIA, Russia, Israel, Iran, and China.
How Jeffrey Epstein's intelligence ties go back decades middleeasteye.net 1 fact
accountBetween 1981 and 1986, the Reagan administration covertly sold arms to Iran, which was at war with Iraq, while Israel served as an intermediary and broker for the sales.
Iran and the Gulf: Why Hedging Is No Longer Enough warontherocks.com 1 fact
accountThe 12-Day Israel–Iran War occurred in June 2025 and included an Iranian strike on Qatar.
The Arab Approach to Mediation—Reshaping Diplomacy in a ... washingtoninstitute.org 1 fact
claimThe United Arab Emirates has prioritized de-escalation and normalization with Iran, Israel, Turkey, Qatar, and Syria to support its focus on regional stability and economic diversification.
Cyberattack Activity Linked to the Middle East Increases asisonline.org 1 fact
claimIranian threat actors target critical infrastructure and technology sector organizations in Australia, Cyprus, Germany, and Jordan due to these nations' support for Israel or the United States.
5 key factors shaping Iran's foreign policy calculus mei.edu 1 fact
claimIran and Russia lack full convergence on regional issues, specifically regarding Israel and the post-Assad political future of Syria.
Energy asset stranding in resource-rich developing countries and ... frontiersin.org 1 fact
claimGermany maintains energy partnership agreements with Algeria, Angola, Australia, Brazil, Chile, China, India, Iran, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Mexico, Morocco, Nigeria, Norway, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, USA, and Uzbekistan.
Ufology: From Fringe to Mainstream to Fringe? - Skeptic Magazine skeptic.com 1 fact
accountChris Bledsoe, author of 'UFO of God', claims an entity he calls 'The Lady' told him that glowing orbs would intervene to stop missiles if Israel and Iran go to war.
Emails Reveal Epstein's Ties to Mossad—But Corporate ... - FAIR.org fair.org 1 fact
claimA hacking group known as "Handala," which has reported ties to the Iranian government, has conducted cyberattacks against Israeli government officials and facilities since 2024.