Relations (1)
cross_type 6.15 — strongly supporting 51 facts
The United States is a major external power that actively shapes regional dynamics in the Middle East through military presence, diplomatic initiatives, and strategic competition with rivals like Iran, China, and Russia, as evidenced by [1], [2], and [3].
Facts (51)
Sources
Opportunities for Collective Regional Security in the Middle East carnegieendowment.org 10 facts
claimMajor global powers, including the United States and China, appeared resigned to the inevitability of prolonged instability in the Middle East.
perspectiveThe author argues that the Middle East's stability and security depend on collaborative regional efforts and joint diplomacy among influential Middle Eastern states, rather than relying on external powers like the United States.
perspectiveSome ruling elites and civil society groups in the Middle East believe that global powers, specifically the United States, China, Russia, and the European Union, should intervene to stabilize the region.
claimGreat powers, including the United States, China, Europe, and Russia, often prioritize strategic interests over humanitarian and developmental considerations in the Middle East, which perpetuates and exacerbates regional instability.
claimGlobal powers including the United States, China, Russia, and the European Union have adopted fragmented and reactive approaches to Middle Eastern conflicts, often prioritizing immediate interests or crisis management over structural resolution.
claimThe United States is currently unable or unwilling to lead a collective regional security initiative in the Middle East, which creates an urgent need for regional players to assume this responsibility.
accountPrior to the 2011 Arab Spring, the Middle East faced instability due to the aftermath of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, the regional war on terror, stalled Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations, the Gaza blockade, settlement activity in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and escalations between Israel and Palestinian factions.
perspectiveThe Middle East's path toward stability and security depends on collaborative regional efforts, dialogue, coordinated initiatives, and joint diplomacy among influential states rather than reliance on external powers like the United States.
claimThe United States and China primarily manage crises in the Middle East through piecemeal, temporary measures aimed at safeguarding their immediate interests rather than resolving structural challenges.
perspectiveThe inability or unwillingness of the United States to lead a regional security initiative in the Middle East creates an urgent need for regional players to assume this responsibility.
An Integrated U.S. Strategy to Address Iran's Nuclear and Regional ... carnegieendowment.org 7 facts
accountSince the U.S. drawdown from Iraq in 2011, the United States has maintained a force presence of roughly 30,000–40,000 troops in the Middle East to conduct missions such as operations against the Islamic State, ensure freedom of navigation in the Gulf, and deter destabilizing Iranian behavior.
claimThe application of a strategy to normalize Iran's nuclear program faces domestic opposition within the Iranian regime, resistance from U.S. domestic political actors, skepticism from U.S. regional allies in the Middle East, and opposition from Russia, which views such rapprochement as a threat to its influence and nuclear market share in Iran.
accountKarim Sadjadpour is a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, focusing on Iran and U.S. foreign policy toward the Middle East.
claimA proposed policy option for the United States involves developing a regional Middle Eastern or subregional Gulf regime to manage nuclear fuel-cycle activities and potentially address nuclear-capable ballistic missiles.
claimIran's reactions to increased United States efforts to counter and expose Iranian power and influence in the Middle East will likely vary based on the geopolitical importance of the specific area to Iran.
claimThe Carnegie Endowment for International Peace operates a global network of policy research centers in Russia, China, Europe, the Middle East, India, and the United States.
claimThe U.S. military presence in the Middle East serves as a key point of leverage in nuclear negotiations and a deterrent against Iranian nuclear breakout.
The Middle East, including the Palestinian Question, April 2026 ... securitycouncilreport.org 3 facts
accountIran retaliated against the joint Israeli-US strikes by attacking Israel, US bases, and allied assets in the Middle East, and by effectively closing the Strait of Hormuz.
claimJoint Israeli–US strikes on Iran began on 28 February 2026, triggering a sharp escalation in hostilities in the Middle East.
claimThe regional escalation in the Middle East has injected uncertainty into international efforts to advance the US-proposed peace framework known as the 'Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict,' which the UN Security Council endorsed through resolution 2803 on 17 November 2025.
Policy Steps to Prevent a Nuclear Iran | The Washington Institute washingtoninstitute.org 2 facts
claimBarring significant political change, Iran is unlikely to fundamentally alter its approach to the United States, the Middle East, or its nuclear pursuits.
perspectiveThe author argues that the Trump administration's restraint regarding military conflict in the Middle East may be unrealistic given U.S. military resource constraints and the strategic priority placed on the Indo-Pacific.
Geopolitical, Strategic, and Humanitarian Implications of ... ardd-jo.org 2 facts
claimIran recognizes that it can outlast U.S. military engagement in the Middle East, particularly given domestic U.S. opposition to deploying ground troops.
perspectiveChina appears content to observe the weakening of the United States and may view the current Middle East crisis as an opportunity to move on Taiwan, potentially leading to a wider global conflict.
A Status Quo Power in a Changing Region: Iran's Regionalism in ... cambridge.org 2 facts
claimThe USA has pursued a policy of excluding Iran by consolidating security relationships with Arab monarchies and Israel to highlight their collective antagonism towards Iran in the Middle East.
claimTehran is concerned that the de facto alliance between Israel, Turkey, and Azerbaijan in the South Caucasus mirrors US efforts to contain Iran in the Middle East.
Five fundamental questions for US foreign policy as the Iran war ... mei.edu 2 facts
referenceThe Trump administration's national security strategy, issued in November, stated that the Middle East no longer dominates American foreign policy in long-term planning and day-to-day execution because it is no longer considered a constant irritant or a source of imminent catastrophe.
perspectiveThe author argues that the current US approach of conducting military strikes without a clear strategy risks worsening the situation inside Iran and the broader Middle East region.
The EU between strategic autonomy and the transatlantic relationship esisc.org 2 facts
claimThe United States faces security concerns in Asia, Europe, the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), Sub-Saharan Africa, the High North, and the Arctic.
perspectiveThe United States might benefit from a more strategically autonomous European Union capable of maintaining low-level security competition in and around Europe, given the rise of China, Russian assertiveness, and Middle Eastern tensions.
Iran War: Kinetic, Cyber, Electronic and Psychological Warfare ... resecurity.com 1 fact
accountA joint Israel-US military action began in Iran on Saturday, February 28, 2026, with the stated goal of regime change and altering the political map of the Middle East and the global order.
The Persian Gulf TV War by Douglas Kellner (http://www.gseis.ucla ... pages.gseis.ucla.edu 1 fact
claimJim Hoagland stated in his Washington Post column that the United States must use military force against Saddam Hussein to save oil fields and preserve American influence in the Middle East.
Power Transition in the Middle East: The Intersection of US Global ... populismstudies.org 1 fact
claimThe Middle East is currently being reorganized by overlapping energy, security, and corridor politics as US primacy becomes more contested.
Iran's Geopolitical Footprint: Regional Power or Global Contender? moderndiplomacy.eu 1 fact
perspectiveIran positions itself as a defender of oppressed peoples in the Muslim world and as an adversary to the hegemony of the United States, Israel, and Western influence in the Middle East.
We Bombed the Wrong Target Iran's Proxy Network Strategy irregularwarfare.org 1 fact
claimChina views the intermittent cycle of Middle East escalation as a way to increase the strategic cost of the U.S. Gulf posture and distract Washington from confronting China in the Indo-Pacific.
United States and Iran on the Brink: What's at Stake? - CSIS csis.org 1 fact
claimThe United States has engaged in an unprecedented military buildup in the Middle East, flooding the region with military assets.
Iran's Regional Proxies: Reshaping the Middle East and ... isdp.eu 1 fact
perspectiveIran and its proxy groups, including Hezbollah, Kataib Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Hashd al-Shaabi, share a primary objective of expelling U.S. forces from the Middle East.
Independence play: Europe's pursuit of strategic autonomy ecfr.eu 1 fact
claimStrategic autonomy is defined as the establishment of a capacity to work together in Europe when European and American interests are not aligned, especially in regional crises on Europe’s eastern and southern flanks, rather than autarky or the rejection of United States support.
After the War: Rethinking Regional Security in the Middle ... arab-reform.net 1 fact
accountThe Middle East has incurred significant human, economic, and environmental costs over the last two decades, including the U.S. invasion of Iraq, the war in Syria, state collapse in Libya, Yemen, and Sudan, the genocide in Gaza, wars in Lebanon, mass displacement, and insecurity in the Gulf and Red Sea.
China and Russia's foreign policy in the Middle East and ... wasj.ir 1 fact
claimChina and Russia have increasingly emerged as two major powers shaping regional policies in the Middle East in recent decades, coinciding with a decline in United States influence.
How to Handle Iran's Nuclear Ambitions - New Lines Institute newlinesinstitute.org 1 fact
perspectiveTo prevent nuclear proliferation and stabilize the Middle East, the New Lines Institute recommends that the U.S. abandon coercion as the primary tool of statecraft and pivot to a framework of strategic reciprocity, offering security assurances and reintegration to Iran in exchange for verifiable limits on its nuclear program and regional activities.
The impact of the Iran conflict on global energy markets atlanticcouncil.org 1 fact
referenceThe Atlantic Council's Middle East Programs work with allies and partners in Europe and the Middle East to protect US interests, build peace and security, and unlock the human potential of the region.
Iran War Unravels U.S. Strategy and Strengthens Russia–China Axis toda.org 1 fact
claimUnited States officials report that Russia is providing Iran with satellite imagery and intelligence regarding the locations of American warships and aircraft in the Middle East.
Twenty questions (and expert answers) about the Iran war atlanticcouncil.org 1 fact
claimThe United States is moving some of its most advanced missile defense units from the Indo-Pacific to the Middle East, a move that Beijing views as removing a direct threat to China's security interests in the Indo-Pacific region.
A Region at Capacity: War, Displacement, and the Limits of ... mecouncil.org 1 fact
claimThe war involving Israel, the United States, and Iran highlights the fragility of the humanitarian landscape in the Middle East.
War in Ukraine | Global Conflict Tracker - Council on Foreign Relations cfr.org 1 fact
claimUkrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy stated that U.S.-brokered talks between Russia and Ukraine may be relocated to Turkey or Switzerland if the originally planned meeting in Abu Dhabi is unfeasible due to the war in the Middle East.
Iran's Regional Armed Network - Council on Foreign Relations cfr.org 1 fact
measurementIn the months following the October 2023 Hamas assault on Israel, suspected proxy forces for Iran killed three U.S. troops in Jordan and injured dozens more on U.S. military bases across the Middle East, according to U.S. officials.
Iran War: Potential Impact on Global Equities - Charles Schwab schwab.com 1 fact
claimThe United States is less exposed to Middle East energy supply disruptions due to domestic energy production, though it remains susceptible to the negative impacts of higher global oil and gas prices on consumer spending and manufacturing.
The Israel-Hamas War: Risks of Escalation and Scenarios for ... mei.edu 1 fact
claimThe United States is shifting its policy to engage more actively in the Middle East through diplomacy and the deployment of military assets to deter actions by Iran.
Escalation in the Middle East | MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES msf-me.org 1 fact
accountIn late February, United States and Israeli forces carried out airstrikes against Iran, which were followed by retaliatory actions impacting multiple countries across the Middle East.
The Geopolitical Competition of the United States, China ... journalisslp.com 1 fact
claimS. Ebrahimi and Rezaei analyzed China's Middle East policy and its competition with the United States in a 2012 study.