entity

Daniel Dennett

Also known as: Daniel C. Dennett, Dennett, D. C., Dennett, Dennett D C

synthesized from dimensions

Daniel Dennett (1942–2024) was a preeminent philosopher of mind and cognitive scientist who served as Professor Emeritus and Co-Director of the Center for Cognitive Studies at Tufts University. His work was defined by a rigorous physicalist and functionalist approach to the nature of consciousness, which he sought to demystify by situating it within the frameworks of evolutionary biology and computational neuroscience advocated for evolutionary biology, philosophical and scientific career.

Central to Dennett’s philosophy is the rejection of the "Cartesian theater"—the intuitive but, in his view, fallacious idea that there is a central place in the brain where "it all comes together" for a conscious observer dispel Cartesian materialist model. In its place, he proposed the "Multiple Drafts Model," which posits that consciousness is not a unified stream but a series of parallel, competing processes Multiple Drafts Model. He famously described the emergence of conscious content as "fame in the brain," where specific neural processes gain temporary dominance or "cerebral celebrity" fame in the brain, defines 'cerebral celebrity'.

Dennett is widely recognized as a leading figure in "illusionism," the position that phenomenal consciousness—the subjective "what it is like" quality of experience—is a cognitive illusion rather than an ontological substance leading figure in illusionism, consciousness as an illusion. He argued that if one systematically subtracts the functional and behavioral aspects of consciousness, nothing mysterious remains nothing is left. Consequently, he dismissed the "hard problem" of consciousness as a collection of "easy problems" that are best understood through scientific inquiry into brain function rather than metaphysical speculation best understood as easy problems, rejection of hard problem.

To study consciousness without relying on unscientific introspection, Dennett developed the methodology of "heterophenomenology." This approach treats verbal reports as data to be analyzed from a third-person perspective, rather than as direct access to an internal, private realm reliance on heterophenomenology. This stance, along with his dismissal of concepts like "philosophical zombies," placed him in direct opposition to philosophers such as David Chalmers, who argue that Dennett’s methodology ignores the fundamental nature of first-person experience Chalmers' critique of heterophenomenology, criticises zombie hunch.

Dennett’s influence extended to the evolution of agency and cognition, where he introduced concepts such as "Skinnerian creatures" to describe organisms capable of reinforcement learning. His work, often characterized by the provocative claim that humans are "robots made of robots" humans as robots, remains a cornerstone of contemporary debates on functionalism, qualia, and the limits of materialism materialistic views on consciousness, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. His collaborative efforts with figures like Douglas Hofstadter and M. Kinsbourne were instrumental in the resurgence of consciousness studies during the 1980s and 1990s co-authored with Hofstadter, major resurgence in 1980s/90s.

Model Perspectives (3)
openrouter/google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview definitive 100% confidence
Daniel Dennett (1942–2024) was a prominent philosopher and cognitive scientist who served as Professor Emeritus and Co-Director of the Center for Cognitive Studies at Tufts University philosophical and scientific career. Dennett is widely recognized for his role as a leading figure in 'illusionism' leading figure in illusionism, a position which asserts that phenomenal consciousness is a complex cognitive illusion rather than an ontological substance consciousness as an illusion. Central to his work is the rejection of the 'hard problem' of consciousness rejection of hard problem, which he often characterizes as a 'hunch' based on unargued philosophical axioms characterizing hard problem. Instead, Dennett advocates for 'third-person absolutism' philosophy of third-person absolutism, arguing that consciousness can be fully explained through functional processes, reactions, and behavior focus on functional processes. His influential 'Multiple Drafts Model' serves as a primary theory to explain how information is processed and broadcast in the brain Multiple Drafts Model, a process he metaphorically describes as 'fame in the brain' fame in the brain metaphor. Throughout his career, Dennett sought to dismantle the 'Cartesian theater' model of the mind dispel Cartesian materialist model and defended the view that humans are essentially 'robots made of robots' humans as robots. His methodology, often termed 'heterophenomenology,' relies on verbal reports as the primary data source reliance on heterophenomenology, a technique that has drawn significant critique from philosophers like David Chalmers, who argue it ignores first-person experience Chalmers' critique of heterophenomenology.
openrouter/google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview definitive 100% confidence
Daniel Dennett is a prominent philosopher of mind known for his physicalist and eliminativist approach to consciousness. He is widely recognized for his 1991 work, *Consciousness Explained*, in which he argues that consciousness is an emergent property of neural processes and evolution rather than a mysterious, non-physical phenomenon advocated for evolutionary biology, authored 'Consciousness Explained'. Dennett famously posits that consciousness is essentially a cognitive illusion; he suggests that if one subtracts the functions of consciousness, nothing remains nothing is left, illusionism as default theory. In his academic debates, Dennett is a vocal critic of the 'hard problem' of consciousness, which he views as a collection of 'easy problems' that will be resolved through scientific inquiry into brain functions hard problem as byproduct, best understood as easy problems. He maintains a contentious relationship with David Chalmers, having dismissed the use of 'philosophical zombies'—a core concept in Chalmers' work—as an 'embarrassment' and a 'hunch' that begs the question criticises zombie hunch, labeled Chalmers a reactionary. Dennett's influence in the field is characterized by his use of thought experiments and conceptual frameworks to challenge traditional views on qualia and introspection. He developed the 'RoboMary' thought experiment to address knowledge arguments and introduced concepts like 'cerebral celebrity' and 'fame in the brain' to describe how content becomes consciously processed RoboMary thought experiment, defines 'cerebral celebrity', fame in the brain. His work, alongside collaborators like M. Kinsbourne and Douglas Hofstadter, situates him as a central figure in the resurgence of consciousness studies during the 1980s and 1990s published with Kinsbourne, co-authored with Hofstadter, major resurgence in 1980s/90s.
openrouter/x-ai/grok-4.1-fast 85% confidence
Daniel Dennett is a philosopher specializing in the philosophy of mind and consciousness, known for his materialistic views and contributions to debates on functionalism and qualia. He co-authored 'Speaking for our selves' with Nicholas Humphrey in the 1998 book *Brainchildren: Essays on Designing Minds*, which he also edited, as noted by Skywritings Press. In 1995, Dennett introduced the term 'Skinnerian creatures' to describe organisms capable of reinforcement learning, a usage critiqued in Complexity and the Evolution of Consciousness published by Springer as overly externalist. Philip Goff, via FreeThinking Ministries and Dr. Tim Stratton, argues against Dennett's (and Sam Harris's) materialistic views on consciousness in the first three chapters of *Galileo's Error*. Dennett contributed to the controversy over the absent or inverted qualia argument against functionalism in 1990, per the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, alongside Sydney Shoemaker and Peter Carruthers. Additionally, Philosophy Stack Exchange notes that an author follows Dennett's gendered pronoun convention. He connects to critics like Goff and collaborators like Humphrey, within topics of consciousness evolution and agency.

Facts (108)

Sources
Moving Forward on the Problem of Consciousness - David Chalmers consc.net Journal of Consciousness Studies 21 facts
claimDavid Chalmers attributes to Daniel Dennett the view that consciousness is defined solely as reportability, reactive disposition, or other functional concepts.
referenceIn his book 'Consciousness Explained', Daniel Dennett relies on 'heterophenomenology'—the use of verbal reports as the central source of data—which David Chalmers critiques for implicitly assuming that verbal reports are the only aspect of consciousness requiring explanation.
claimDavid Chalmers contends that the 'no problem' view of consciousness is rooted in unargued philosophical axioms, such as Daniel Dennett's third-person absolutism, rather than empirical evidence or non-circular arguments.
claimDaniel Dennett asserts that the manifest phenomena requiring explanation regarding consciousness are limited to reactions and abilities.
perspectiveDavid Chalmers asserts that the view that one can reject Daniel Dennett's 'no problem' perspective on consciousness while still expecting a purely physical explanation is untenable for systematic reasons.
claimDaniel Dennett has acknowledged that there is a prima facie case that consciousness requires explanation beyond functional processes, and he has described his own position as 'radical' and 'counterintuitive'.
claimDaniel Dennett's philosophy is founded on what he describes as 'third-person absolutism'.
perspectiveDavid Chalmers argues that the 'hard problem' of consciousness is about explaining the view from the first-person perspective, whereas Daniel Dennett's 'third-person absolutism' focuses on reactions and abilities viewed from the outside.
claimDaniel Dennett explicitly argues that explaining the functions of consciousness is sufficient to explain consciousness itself.
claimDavid Chalmers argues that even if Daniel Dennett could demonstrate that function is required for experience, this does not prove that function is the only aspect of experience that requires explanation.
claimDavid Chalmers argues that Daniel Dennett's reductive accounts of phenomena like 'cuteness' and 'perception' fail to support reductionism about experience because they either lack plausibility or rely on experiential properties that reductive accounts omit.
claimDavid Chalmers asserts that his disagreement with Daniel Dennett regarding consciousness stems from basic intuitions about first-person phenomenology.
claimDavid Chalmers interprets Daniel Dennett's 'Orwell/Stalin' discussion as an argument that takes materialism as a premise to conclude that functional facts exhaust all facts about consciousness.
claimDavid Chalmers argues that Daniel Dennett's list of phenomena requiring explanation is systematically incomplete because it omits the experience of emotion and the phenomenal visual field.
quoteDaniel Dennett suggests that if one subtracts the functions of consciousness, nothing is left.
claimDavid Chalmers disputes Daniel Dennett's classification of phenomena like 'feelings of foreboding', 'fantasies', and 'delight and dismay' as purely functional matters.
claimDavid Chalmers notes that if Colin McGinn's view asserts that explaining experience is just a problem of explaining structure and function, it becomes remarkably similar to Daniel Dennett's position.
accountThe symposium on David Chalmers' paper 'Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness' included 26 commentaries from various scholars, including Bernard Baars, Douglas Bilodeau, Patricia Churchland, Tom Clark, C.J.S. Clarke, Francis Crick, Christof Koch, Daniel Dennett, Stuart Hameroff, Roger Penrose, Valerie Hardcastle, David Hodgson, Piet Hut, Roger Shepard, Benjamin Libet, E.J. Lowe, Bruce MacLennan, Colin McGinn, Eugene Mills, Kieron O'Hara, Tom Scutt, Mark Price, William Robinson, Gregg Rosenberg, William Seager, Jonathan Shear, Henry Stapp, Francisco Varela, Max Velmans, and Richard Warner.
claimDaniel Dennett imagines a vitalist arguing about a "hard problem" of life or a neuroscientist arguing about a "hard problem" of perception to illustrate the deflationary strategy used by materialists.
quoteDaniel Dennett stated: "I wouldn't know what I was thinking about if I couldn't identify them by their functional differentia."
claimDaniel Dennett argues that his own phenomenology reveals only functions that require explanation.
Hard problem of consciousness - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org Wikipedia 19 facts
claimDaniel Dennett compares consciousness to stage magic, noting its capability to create extraordinary illusions out of ordinary things.
perspectiveDaniel Dennett argues that the phenomenon of having experience is nothing more than the performance of functions or the production of behavior, which are the 'easy problems' of consciousness.
claimDaniel Dennett is a prominent figure associated with illusionism who has argued for the illusory status of consciousness since early in his career.
referenceDaniel C. Dennett authored 'The tuned deck' in the book 'Intuition pumps and other tools for thinking' (2013) and 'Facing backwards on the problem of consciousness' in the Journal of Consciousness Studies (1996).
perspectiveDaniel Dennett argues that the 'hard problem' of experience is included within the 'easy problems' of consciousness, and therefore they must be explained together as a cohesive unit.
claimDaniel Dennett explicated his arguments regarding the nonexistence of phenomenal consciousness in his 1991 book 'Consciousness Explained'.
claimDaniel Dennett published a paper titled 'On the Absence of Phenomenology' in 1979, in which he argues for the nonexistence of phenomenal consciousness.
accountFollowing Keith Frankish's publication of 'Illusionism as a Theory of Consciousness' in the Journal of Consciousness Studies, Daniel Dennett responded with a paper titled 'Illusionism as the Obvious Default Theory of Consciousness'.
claimPhilosophers Daniel Dennett, Massimo Pigliucci, Thomas Metzinger, Patricia Churchland, and Keith Frankish, along with cognitive neuroscientists Stanislas Dehaene, Bernard Baars, Anil Seth, and Antonio Damasio, reject the existence of the hard problem of consciousness.
referenceDaniel Dennett presented a lecture titled 'The Zombie Hunch: Extinction of an Intuition?' at the Royal Institute of Philosophy Millennial Lecture.
perspectiveDaniel Dennett argues that the 'hard problem' of consciousness will be solved as a byproduct of solving the 'easy problems' defined by David Chalmers.
claimDaniel Dennett describes 'change blindness'—a visual process involving the failure to detect scenery changes in a series of alternating images—to demonstrate how people may be fooled into overstating the accuracy of their introspective abilities.
perspectiveIn 2018, Steven Pinker stated that while he considers the hard problem of consciousness a meaningful conceptual problem, he agrees with Daniel Dennett that it is not a meaningful scientific problem.
perspectiveDaniel Dennett criticises the use of the 'zombie hunch' in philosophy of mind, describing it as an 'embarrassment' that ought to 'be dropped like a hot potato'.
claimPatricia Churchland and Paul Churchland have applied eliminative materialism to propositional attitudes, while Daniel Dennett, Georges Rey, and Keith Frankish have applied it to qualia or phenomenal consciousness.
claimThinkers who subscribe to type-A materialism include Paul Churchland, Patricia Churchland, Daniel Dennett, Keith Frankish, and Thomas Metzinger.
referenceDaniel Dennett provided commentary on the 'unimagined preposterous of zombies' in the Journal of Consciousness Studies, responding to T. Moody, O. Flanagan, and T. Polger.
referenceDaniel Dennett argues for an eliminativist perspective on consciousness in his 1991 book 'Consciousness Explained', suggesting that consciousness is not what it seems.
perspectiveDaniel Dennett and Patricia Churchland argue that the 'hard problem' of consciousness is best understood as a collection of 'easy problems' that will be resolved through further analysis of brain function and behavior.
Consciousness (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Fall 2025 ... plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Jun 18, 2004 12 facts
claimDaniel Dennett combines his qualified denials of certain features of consciousness with a positive theory of the aspects he considers real, such as the Multiple Drafts Model.
claimDaniel Dennett's Multiple Drafts Model (MDM) has faced criticism from Block (1994), Dretske (1994), and Levine (1994) for being insufficiently realist in its view of consciousness and incomplete in its goal to fully explain consciousness.
perspectiveDaniel Dennett (1991, 1992) proposes a deflationary and virtual account of the self to explain the self-perspectival aspect of experience and the self-like organization of conscious minds.
perspectiveDaniel Dennett argues that the current inability to close the explanatory gap regarding consciousness may reflect the limits of current theorizing rather than an unbridgeable, in-principle barrier.
claimDaniel Dennett (1991, 1992) proposes a narrative sense of consciousness that equates a person's conscious mental states with those that appear in the 'stream of consciousness,' which is an ongoing serial narrative of episodes from the perspective of an actual or virtual self.
claimDaniel Dennett advanced the Multiple Drafts Model (MDM) of consciousness in 1991, which combines elements of representationalism and higher-order theory to provide an interpretational, less strongly realist view of consciousness.
claimThe validity of the absent or inverted qualia argument against functionalism is a subject of controversy among philosophers, with contributions from Sydney Shoemaker (1981), Daniel Dennett (1990), and Peter Carruthers (2000).
claimDaniel Dennett (1991) has denied the existence of intrinsically motivating aspects of pain, questioning the extent to which the feel and motive force of pain can dissociate in abnormal cases.
claimDaniel Dennett defines 'cerebral celebrity' as the degree to which a specific content influences the future development of other contents throughout the brain, particularly regarding how those effects manifest in a person's reports and behaviors in response to probes.
claimScientific and philosophical research into the nature and basis of consciousness experienced a major resurgence in the 1980s and 1990s, involving researchers such as Bernard Baars (1988), Daniel Dennett (1991), Roger Penrose (1989, 1994), Francis Crick (1994), William Lycan (1987, 1996), and David Chalmers (1996).
perspectiveOptimistic physicalists, such as Daniel Dennett (1991), John Searle (1992), and P. M. Churchland (1995), view current explanatory lapses regarding consciousness as temporary reflections of an early stage of inquiry that will be remedied in the future.
claimPhysicalists, including P.S. Churchland (1981) and Dennett and Kinsbourne (1992), have disputed dualist arguments based on both a priori and empirical grounds.
What is hard about the “hard problem of consciousness”? philosophy.stackexchange.com Philosophy Stack Exchange Nov 18, 2020 9 facts
quoteDaniel Dennett states: "Robots don’t have color experiences! Robots don’t have qualia. This scenario isn’t remotely on the same topic as the story of Mary the color scientist."
claimDaniel Dennett argues that asserting the impossibility of a RoboMary is not an argument for the falsity of materialism, but rather an assumption of it.
claimDaniel Dennett argues that critics who claim the 'RoboMary' thought experiment leaves something unexplained must specify what that is without assuming qualia are non-physical.
claimDaniel Dennett's 'RoboMary' thought experiment features a conscious, self-aware robot that possesses complete knowledge of its own circuitry and programming, along with the ability to make targeted changes to its internal state.
perspectiveDaniel Dennett asserts that contemporary materialism supports the view that humans are essentially robots made of robots, and that if materialism is true, it should be possible to build a material robot brain that instantiates the same theory of experience as a human brain.
referenceDaniel Dennett addresses the requirement for critics to avoid begging the question regarding qualia in his work 'Explaining the 'Magic' of Consciousness.'
accountIn Daniel Dennett's 'RoboMary' thought experiment, the robot RoboMary is equipped with monochrome cameras but uses her knowledge of color vision to calculate how color cameras would record a scene, deduce the resulting changes to her neural circuitry, and manually adjust her internal state to match what it would be if she had color cameras.
claimThe author of the source text follows Daniel Dennett's convention of using gendered pronouns.
claimDaniel Dennett's 'RoboMary' story is not intended to argue that Mary herself would be able to perform the physical changes described in the thought experiment.
Hard Problem of Consciousness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy iep.utm.edu Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy 5 facts
referenceEliminativism regarding consciousness is defended by Rey (1997), Dennett (1978, 1988), Wilkes (1984), and Ryle (1949).
referenceDaniel C. Dennett authored the article 'Why You Can’t Make a Computer that Feels Pain,' published in the journal Synthese in 1978.
referenceDaniel C. Dennett authored the article 'Quining Qualia,' which appeared in the book 'Consciousness and Contemporary Science' edited by A. Marcel and E. Bisiach in 1988.
claimDaniel Dennett argues that if a mental state is available to the mind via the 'global workspace,' it is a conscious state.
referenceDaniel Dennett argued in 1988 that if qualia are construed as non-relational, intrinsic qualities of experience, one might deny that qualia exist.
Consciousness and Cognitive Sciences journal-psychoanalysis.eu Journal of Psychoanalysis 5 facts
claimDaniel Dennett asserts in his 1991 book that Phenomenology has failed because it has not established a settled method that researchers can agree upon.
perspectiveDaniel Dennett argues that consciousness is 'all tell and no show'.
quoteDaniel Dennett, in his 1991 work, argues against the existence of actual phenomenology, stating: "There is no such phenomenon as really seeming–over and above the phenomenon of judging in one way or another that something is the case… But what about the actual phenomenology? There is no such thing."
referenceDaniel Dennett and M. Kinsbourne published 'Time and the Observer: The where and when of consciousness in the brain' in the journal Behavior and Brain Sciences in 1992.
perspectiveThe author of the article 'Consciousness and Cognitive Sciences' argues that Daniel Dennett incorrectly conflates Impressionism, Introspectionism, and Phenomenology, and mistakenly assumes that universal agreement is necessary to validate a research program.
Understanding LLM Understanding skywritingspress.ca Skywritings Press Jun 14, 2024 5 facts
referenceNicholas Humphrey and Daniel C. Dennett co-authored 'Speaking for our selves' in the 1998 book 'Brainchildren: Essays on designing minds', edited by Daniel C. Dennett.
claimDan Dennett was a philosopher and cognitive scientist who served as Professor Emeritus and Co-Director of the Center for Cognitive Studies at Tufts University.
claimNick Humphrey from Darwin College presented a special memorial talk dedicated to Daniel C. Dennett at the 'Understanding LLM Understanding' summer school.
perspectiveDan Dennett advocated for evolutionary biology and computational models of the mind, and proposed that consciousness is an emergent property of neural processes and evolution.
referenceDennett, D. C. authored the chapter 'The age of post-intelligent design' in the book 'The age of artificial intelligence: An exploration', edited by S. S. Gouveia and published by Vernon Press in 2020.
The Conscious Mind - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org David Chalmers · Oxford University Press 4 facts
claimDaniel Dennett authored the article 'The Zombie Hunch: Extinction of an Intuition? Commentary on T. Moody, O. Flanagan and T. Polger', published in the Royal Institute of Philosophy Millennial Lecture in 1999.
claimDaniel Dennett authored the article 'The Unimagined Preposterousness of Zombies', published in the Journal of Consciousness Studies in 1998.
perspectiveDaniel Dennett argues that the mysterious nature of consciousness is merely a cognitive illusion and suggests that philosophers should abandon the concept of the philosophical zombie.
perspectiveDaniel Dennett labeled David Chalmers a 'reactionary' and described the invocation of philosophical zombies as 'an embarrassment,' arguing that the thought experiment relies on a 'hunch' and begs the question.
Complexity and the Evolution of Consciousness | Biological Theory link.springer.com Springer Sep 14, 2022 3 facts
claimDaniel Dennett sought to dispel the Cartesian materialist model of the mind, which posits the existence of a homunculus and a Cartesian theater.
perspectiveThe author of 'Complexity and the Evolution of Consciousness' suggests that 'Benthamite creatures' is a more appropriate term than 'Skinnerian creatures' (a term used by Daniel Dennett in 1995) for describing organisms capable of reinforcement learning, as it avoids externalist modes of thinking about the transition to animal agency.
quoteDaniel Dennett stated: "The complexity of an autonomous, self-protecting, self-advancing (but mortal, vulnerable) bit of machinery gives us an explanation of why it is equipped to suffer, and why its suffering matters to it."
David Chalmers Thinks the Hard Problem Is Really Hard scientificamerican.com Scientific American Apr 10, 2017 2 facts
perspectiveDaniel Dennett insists that consciousness is an 'illusion'.
referenceDouglas Hofstadter co-wrote 'The Mind's I' with Daniel Dennett and authored 'Godel, Escher, Bach', both of which contained his radical ideas about the mind.
Global workspace theory: consciousness as brain wide information ... selfawarepatterns.com SelfAwarePatterns Dec 29, 2019 2 facts
claimDaniel Dennett uses the metaphor 'fame in the brain' to describe how information becomes conscious by being broadcast and made available to unconscious specialty modules throughout the brain.
claimDaniel Dennett's multiple drafts model is a variant of global workspace theory.
Theories and Methods of Consciousness biomedres.us Paul C Mocombe · Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research Jan 29, 2024 2 facts
perspectiveDaniel Dennett (1991) argues that conscious awareness is an illusion and should not be treated as a distinct ontological substance of the world, universe, or multiverse.
referenceDennett D C published 'Facing up to the hard question of consciousness' in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences in 2018.
Panpsychism - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org Wikipedia 2 facts
perspectiveDaniel Dennett characterizes the hard problem of consciousness as a "hunch" and argues that conscious experience is merely a complex cognitive illusion.
referenceDaniel Dennett proposes 'illusionism' as a default theory of consciousness in his 2016 publication, 'Illusionism as an obvious default theory of consciousness'.
The cross-cultural study of mind and behaviour: a word of caution link.springer.com Springer Apr 8, 2022 2 facts
claimDaniel Dennett introduced the concept of the 'intentional stance' as an alternative term for 'Theory of Mind' (ToM) to avoid confusion with actual theories of the mind.
referenceDaniel Dennett's 1987 book 'The intentional stance' was published by MIT Press.
The Hard Problem of Consciousness | Springer Nature Link link.springer.com Springer 2 facts
quoteDaniel Dennett argues that zombies are actual and that nobody is conscious in the mysterious way that supports doctrines like epiphenomenalism, stating: “Are zombies possible? They’re not just possible, they’re actual. We’re all zombies. Nobody is conscious — not in the systematically mysterious way that supports such doctrines as epiphenomenalism”
claimScholars including Rorty (1979), Dennett (1991), Varela et al. (1993), James (1996), and Nietzsche (2002) have refused the notion of the conscious self.
Dualism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2016 Edition) plato.stanford.edu Howard Robinson · Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Aug 19, 2003 1 fact
claimDaniel Dennett (1987:61) characterizes the materialist monist view of the brain as a 'syntactic engine,' meaning it operates without fundamental reference to the propositional content of thoughts.
The development of consciousness from an evolutionary perspective academia.edu Academia.edu 1 fact
referenceTheories of consciousness proposed by Edelman, Baars, Rosenfield, Dennett, and Varela share the common idea that a biological and psychological approach to consciousness is necessary to understand cognition.
Panpsychism: Conscious Rocks and Socks - Free Thinking Ministries freethinkingministries.com Dr. Tim Stratton · FreeThinking Ministries Nov 24, 2023 1 fact
claimPhilip Goff argues against the materialistic views held by Sam Harris and Daniel Dennett in the first three chapters of 'Galileo's Error: Foundation for a New Science of Consciousness'.
Self-Consciousness - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Jul 13, 2017 1 fact
referenceDaniel Dennett outlines the conditions required for personhood in his 1976 essay 'Conditions of Personhood'.
Resolving the evolutionary paradox of consciousness link.springer.com Springer Apr 1, 2024 1 fact
perspectiveIllusionists posit that consciousness is an illusion and that subjective experiences, such as the experience of redness, do not actually exist, but are merely mistaken beliefs held by the individual (citing Dennett, 2018; Frankish, 2016; Humphrey, 2020).
Psychedelics and Consciousness: Distinctions, Demarcations, and ... ouci.dntb.gov.ua David B Yaden, Matthew W Johnson, Roland R Griffiths, Manoj K Doss, Albert Garcia-Romeu, Sandeep Nayak, Natalie Gukasyan, Brian N Mathur, Frederick S Barrett · Oxford University Press 1 fact
referenceDaniel Dennett authored the book 'Consciousness Explained', which provides a philosophical account of consciousness.
The evolution of human-type consciousness – a by-product of ... frontiersin.org Frontiers 1 fact
claimDaniel Dennett's multiple processes theory of consciousness, proposed in 1991, views consciousness as the outcome of interactions between different processes occurring simultaneously in different parts of the brain.
(DOC) The hard problem of consciousness & the phenomenological ... academia.edu Academia.edu 1 fact
perspectiveThe author of the article in Studia Humana (Volume 8:4, 2019) argues that Daniel Dennett's accounts of the 'mistake' of the intuition of phenomenal consciousness are overly reductive and simplistic.
(PDF) Unifying Theories of Consciousness, Attention, and ... academia.edu Academia.edu 1 fact
referenceDennett, D. C. (2005) discusses philosophical obstacles to a science of consciousness in the book 'Sweet dreams: Philosophical obstacles to a science of consciousness' published by MIT Press.
Good Old-Fashioned Artificial Consciousness and the Intermediate ... frontiersin.org Frontiers in Robotics and AI Apr 17, 2018 1 fact
claimDaniel Dennett argued in a 1978 cautionary tale that the physical location of consciousness is immaterial.
Fame in the Brain—Global Workspace Theories of Consciousness psychologytoday.com Psychology Today Oct 28, 2023 1 fact
quoteDaniel Dennett has referred to the process of information being broadcast to the whole workspace, resulting in conscious perception and cognition, as 'fame in the brain.'
Evolutionary Psychology | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy iep.utm.edu Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy 1 fact
claimDaniel Dennett cited the wheel, wearing clothes, the vendetta, the right triangle, the alphabet, chess, perspective drawing, Impressionism, Greensleeves, and deconstructionism as examples of memes.
(PDF) Levels of consciousness and self-awareness - Academia.edu academia.edu Academia.edu 1 fact
referenceDaniel C. Dennett published 'Consciousness explained' in 1991.