social outcomes
Facts (15)
Sources
Measurement of diets that are healthy, environmentally sustainable ... frontiersin.org 11 facts
measurementSocial outcomes were rarely examined in the reviewed literature, appearing in only 6 of 42 (14.3%) publications, and were only present in the most recent years.
referenceThe paper 'Measurement of diets that are healthy, environmentally sustainable...' reviewed studies published between January 2015 and December 2021 that examined dietary patterns in relation to at least two of four thematic pillars: planetary health (climate change, environmental quality, natural resource impacts), human health and disease, economic outcomes (diet cost/affordability), and social outcomes (wages, working conditions, culturally relevant diets).
claimThe four major dimensions of sustainable healthy diets are planetary health, human health, economic outcomes, and social outcomes, though integrating all four into studies of dietary change remains a significant challenge.
measurementIn a review of 42 papers regarding sustainability pillars in food systems, 13 papers (31.0%) examined health, environment, and economic outcomes; four papers (9.5%) examined environment, economic, and social outcomes; one paper (2.4%) examined health, environment, and social outcomes; and no papers examined health, economic, and social outcomes.
measurementThe 42 papers reviewed captured 132 outcomes related to the environment, 95 related to health, 46 related to economics, and 6 related to social issues.
claimThe paper (the source text) explores the extent to which recent literature integrates planetary health, human health, economic outcomes, and social outcomes in its analysis of dietary change.
claimNone of the 42 publications included in the review analyzed all four pillars of sustainability (economic, environment, health, and social) simultaneously.
measurementA total of six social outcomes were analyzed across 42 papers: 33.3% (n = 2) were acceptability outcomes, 33.3% (n = 2) were desirability outcomes, 16.7% (n = 1) was food availability, and 16.7% (n = 1) was social risk.
procedureThe research team developed four categories for social outcomes: acceptability, desirability, food availability, or social risk.
measurementNo publications among the 42 papers reviewed incorporated all four pillars of sustainability, which are defined as health, environment, economic, and social outcomes.
measurementAmong the 6 social-related outcomes analyzed in the 42 reviewed papers, the most frequent categories were acceptability (33.3%), desirability (33.3%), food availability (16.7%), and social risk (16.7%).
Realist Review on Just Transition Towards Low Emission, Climate ... link.springer.com Jan 5, 2026 1 fact
claimThe social outcomes with the highest incidence across energy sector interventions include the prevention or reduction of negative social outcomes within social groups and across societies, and the maximization of social, economic, and decent work gains within regions or countries.
Unknown source 1 fact
claimSustainable healthy diets are defined by four major dimensions: planetary health, human health, economic outcomes, and social outcomes, which have been agreed upon in broad outline.
Types of Parenting Styles and Effects on Children - StatPearls - NCBI ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Sep 18, 2022 1 fact
claimChildren raised with authoritative parenting manage negative emotions more effectively, leading to improved social outcomes and emotional well-being.
Sustainability through business model innovation and climate ... nature.com Jan 20, 2025 1 fact
referenceHuang and Ichikohji (2023) assert that companies can identify new opportunities for value creation while minimizing negative environmental impacts and maximizing positive social outcomes by reimagining traditional business models.