concept

Neurodiversity in Practice: a Conceptual Model of Autistic Strengths

Facts (13)

Sources
Neurodiversity in Practice: a Conceptual Model of Autistic Strengths ... link.springer.com Springer Jul 25, 2023 13 facts
claimThe secondary objective of the article 'Neurodiversity in Practice: a Conceptual Model of Autistic Strengths' was to identify and propose mechanisms of change that explain the effects of strength-based psychosocial interventions on mental health and wellbeing outcomes.
claimIn the study 'Neurodiversity in Practice: a Conceptual Model of Autistic Strengths,' the authors defined 'autistic strengths' as the explicit consideration of strengths used in intervention design, and 'mechanisms of change' as any variable evaluated that was shown to be associated with a measured mental health and wellbeing outcome.
accountThe authors of the study 'Neurodiversity in Practice: a Conceptual Model of Autistic Strengths' retrieved 30 citations, excluded 14 articles for not meeting inclusion criteria, and identified 13 additional sources through bibliography scans, resulting in a final sample size of 29 articles for full-text review.
procedureThe search strategy for the literature review in 'Neurodiversity in Practice: a Conceptual Model of Autistic Strengths' involved: (1) using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms for autism spectrum disorder, (2) using MeSH terms for child or adolescent, and (3) searching for strength-based psychosocial intervention studies.
referenceThe authors of 'Neurodiversity in Practice: a Conceptual Model of Autistic Strengths' identified four domains of mechanisms of change in psychosocial interventions: (1) affective, (2) behavioral, (3) cognitive, and (4) physiological.
procedureThe authors of the article 'Neurodiversity in Practice: a Conceptual Model of Autistic Strengths' conducted a literature review and data synthesis of 24 articles, identified in a search completed in June 2023, to identify autistic strengths used in psychosocial interventions, propose mechanisms of change, and integrate findings into a conceptual model.
claimThe authors of 'Neurodiversity in Practice: a Conceptual Model of Autistic Strengths' propose mechanisms of change for strength-based interventions for autistic individuals to advance the field of strength-based intervention programming for autistic children and adolescents.
claimThe final objective of the article 'Neurodiversity in Practice: a Conceptual Model of Autistic Strengths' was to integrate findings into a conceptual model that identifies potential pathways between autistic strengths, mechanisms of change, and mental health and wellbeing outcomes for future research testing.
claimThe conceptual model presented in the study 'Neurodiversity in Practice: a Conceptual Model of Autistic Strengths' aims to inform future research on how integrating strengths and positive psychology into intervention design can affect change mediating variables and lead to positive mental health outcomes.
procedureThe coding process for the study 'Neurodiversity in Practice: a Conceptual Model of Autistic Strengths' involved three steps: (1) MC completed initial coding using ATLAS.ti to identify in vivo strength-based terms and mechanisms of change; (2) frequency counts of in vivo codes were summarized in a code book; (3) MC and MM discussed codes and frequencies to group conceptually similar codes into categorical domains.
perspectiveThe authors of 'Neurodiversity in Practice: a Conceptual Model of Autistic Strengths' recommend that future research designs incorporate participatory research methods that include representation from the autistic community.
claimThe primary objective of the article 'Neurodiversity in Practice: a Conceptual Model of Autistic Strengths' was to conduct a literature review to identify autistic strengths used in the design of psychosocial interventions.
referenceThe authors of 'Neurodiversity in Practice: a Conceptual Model of Autistic Strengths' identified four domains of autistic strengths used in psychosocial interventions: (1) perceptual, (2) reasoning, (3) expertise, and (4) character strengths.