Knowledge Tree
induction
Facts (17)
Sources
Epistemic Justification – Introduction to Philosophy: Epistemology press.rebus.community 4 facts
claimSome philosophers use the term 'induction' to encompass any non-deductive form of reasoning, including abduction.
referenceInduction is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises makes the truth of the conclusion probable.
claimWhile induction and abduction do not guarantee the truth of a non-basic belief, they provide a plausible epistemic reason to believe a proposition is true.
claimContemporary foundationalists, including both strong and modest varieties, hold that non-basic beliefs can be justified through deduction, induction, and abduction from justified basic beliefs.
Epistemology of Testimony | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy iep.utm.edu 4 facts
claimBeliefs can be categorized based on their source or root, such as perceptual, deductive, inductive, memorial, or testimonial.
claimAn inductively-based belief is formed when an individual infers future events based on past observations, such as inferring the continued operation of gravity.
claimBelief sources include perception (e.g., seeing a chair), deduction (e.g., concluding q from p entails q), induction (e.g., inferring future gravity from past gravity), and memory (e.g., remembering past events).
claimBeliefs can be based on multiple sources simultaneously, such as being partly testimonially-based and partly perceptually-based, or partly inductively-based and partly memorially-based.
Sources of Knowledge: Rationalism, Empiricism, and the Kantian ... press.rebus.community 2 facts
claimDavid Hume asserts that matters of fact are based on observation and experience, and are often generalizations arrived at through induction.
claimInductive truths regarding matters of fact are uncertain and only probable because they depend on the state of the world, which may change in the future.
Epistemological Problems of Testimony plato.stanford.edu Apr 1, 2021 1 fact
claimJack Lyons examined the relationship between testimony, induction, and folk psychology in a 1997 article in the Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Feb 26, 2001 1 fact
claimReductionism in epistemology is the view that the justification of beliefs derived from testimony can be reduced to justifications provided by other sources such as perception, memory, and induction.
Rationalism Vs. Empiricism 101: Which One is Right? - TheCollector thecollector.com Nov 9, 2023 1 fact
claimEmpiricism struggles to explain complex thought processes such as synthesis, abstraction, generalization, specification, deduction, and induction, which are necessary for understanding abstract concepts in mathematics, natural sciences, and social disciplines.
Rationalism Vs. Empiricism: Sources of Human Knowledge ijesh.com 1 fact
claimEmpiricism is a philosophical position that argues the human mind begins as a blank slate and that knowledge arises exclusively through sensory experience and observation, with induction serving as the basis for understanding.
Naturalized epistemology - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org 1 fact
claimW. V. O. Quine's version of naturalized epistemology considers reasons for doubt about the fruitfulness of traditional philosophic study of scientific knowledge, citing the failure of philosophers to find satisfactory answers to radical skepticism and David Hume's criticism of induction.
Naturalized Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Jul 5, 2001 1 fact
claimDavid Hume questioned whether there is a valid justification for believing the conclusions of inductive arguments, noting that premises do not entail conclusions and that justifying induction often relies on induction itself.
Neuro-symbolic AI - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org 1 fact
claimExplainable Neural Networks (XNNs) combine neural networks with symbolic hypergraphs and are trained using a mixture of backpropagation and a symbolic learning method called induction.