claim
Formal epistemology literature addresses four key questions: 1) how should a group aggregate their judgements? 2) how should a group aggregate their fine-grained beliefs? 3) how should Bayesians update on the testimony of others? and 4) what sorts of aggregation methods create rational or effective groups?
Authors
Sources
- Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu via serper
Referenced by nodes (2)
- testimony concept
- judgment aggregation concept