Bright et al. (2018) argue that consensus is not always necessary or possible in scientific reporting, and that majority voting is a valid method for deciding what statements a report will endorse when disagreement exists.

Authors

• Person: Not available Organization: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Sources

• Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy via serper
• Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy via serper
• Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy via serper
• Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy via serper

Referenced by nodes (2)

• disagreement concept
• consensus concept