The 'doctrinal paradox' is a problem in judgment aggregation where a group of individuals with logically consistent beliefs can arrive at a group judgment that is logically inconsistent, originally formulated by Kornhauser and Sager in 1986 in the context of legal judgments.

Authors

• Person: Not available Organization: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Sources

• Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy via serper
• Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy via serper

Referenced by nodes (1)

• judgment aggregation concept