claim
G.E.M. Anscombe argues that the first-person pronoun "I" cannot be understood as a proper name, a demonstrative, or an abbreviation of a definite description because each of these models requires a "conception" to reach its referent, and no such conception can be specified for "I" without either failing to guarantee reference or implying the existence of an immaterial soul.
Authors
Sources
- Self-Consciousness - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu via serper
Referenced by nodes (3)
- first-person pronoun 'I' concept
- immaterial mind concept
- G.E.M. Anscombe entity