Relations (1)

cross_type 2.58 — strongly supporting 5 facts

The U.S. is the primary geographic focus for research regarding the implementation and socioeconomic impacts of decarbonization, as evidenced by studies on its energy system [1], the economic implications of its transition [2], and the need for a just transition in hydrocarbon-intensive regions {fact:2, fact:5}, all while the country simultaneously pursues biodiversity conservation goals [3].

Facts (5)

Sources
Energy Transition Literature - PSU Center for Energy Law and Policy celp.psu.edu Penn State Center for Energy Law and Policy 2 facts
referenceB. F. Snyder (2018) authored 'Vulnerability to Decarbonization in Hydrocarbon-intensive Counties in the United States: A Just Transition to Avoid Post-industrial Decay' in Energy Research & Social Science.
claimThe author of the paper on socioeconomic vulnerability argues that policymakers should mitigate the socioeconomic impacts of decarbonization by taking a spatially targeted approach to aid the United States in implementing a just transition to a low-carbon economy.
Practitioners' perceived risks to biodiversity from renewable energy ... nature.com Nature 1 fact
claimThe United States is the focus of this study because the country has operationalized commitments to expand and strengthen area-based biodiversity conservation while simultaneously undergoing rapid and expansive decarbonization.
Carbon Pricing for Inclusive Prosperity: The Role of Public Support econfip.org EconFIP 1 fact
referenceHigh carbon prices required for decarbonization are not expected to significantly impact global or United States economic growth (Clarke et al. 2014; Goulder et al. 2019).
Advancing energy efficiency: innovative technologies and strategic ... oaepublish.com OAE Publishing 1 fact
referenceArent, D. J., Green, P., Abdullah, Z., et al. published 'Challenges and opportunities in decarbonizing the U.S. energy system' in the journal Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews in 2022 (Volume 169, 112939).