Relations (1)

related 2.32 — strongly supporting 4 facts

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy is frequently evaluated as an intervention within randomized controlled trials, as evidenced by its role as a treatment arm in studies by Buhrman et al. [1], Migliorini et al. [2], and Torrijos-Zarcero et al. [3], while the overall efficacy of the therapy is often assessed through systematic reviews of such trials [4].

Facts (4)

Sources
A systematic review of cognitive behavioral therapy-based ... frontiersin.org Frontiers 4 facts
claimThe systematic review could not examine whether specific forms of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) are more effective than others due to the limited number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
referenceIn a 2016 randomized controlled trial conducted in Australia, Migliorini et al. studied patients with chronic spinal cord injury and depression or anxiety, comparing a treatment group receiving CBT (n=34) against a waitlist control group (n=25).
referenceIn a study by Torrijos-Zarcero et al. (2021) in Spain, patients with chronic pain, depression, and anxiety were treated in a randomized controlled trial comparing Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MSC) (n=62) against Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) (n=61) using weekly face-to-face sessions.
referenceIn a 2015 randomized controlled trial conducted in Sweden, Buhrman et al. studied patients with chronic pain (CP) and depression, comparing a treatment group receiving CBT plus treatment as usual (TAU) (n=28) against a control group receiving only TAU (n=24).