Relations (1)
cross_type 3.00 — strongly supporting 7 facts
The U.S. is related to the most-favoured-nation clause because it is accused of violating this WTO provision through its bilateral trade deals [1], [2], and it applies its own Section 122 tariffs in addition to existing MFN rates [3], [4], [5], [6], [7].
Facts (7)
Sources
Tracking Trump's Trade Deals | Council on Foreign Relations cfr.org 5 facts
measurementFollowing the end of IEEPA tariffs on February 24, 2026, the United States replaced them with temporary Section 122 tariffs at a rate of 10 percent, which is applied on top of existing Most Favored Nation (MFN) rates.
measurementFollowing the end of IEEPA tariff collection on February 24, 2026, the United States replaced them with temporary Section 122 tariffs at a rate of 10 percent, which are applied in addition to existing Most Favored Nation (MFN) rates.
measurementOn February 24, 2026, the collection of IEEPA tariffs ended and was replaced with temporary Section 122 tariffs at a rate of 10 percent, which is applied in addition to existing Most Favored Nation (MFN) rates.
accountOn February 24, 2026, the United States replaced IEEPA tariff collections with temporary Section 122 tariffs at a rate of 10 percent, which is applied on top of existing Most Favored Nation (MFN) rates.
accountThe United States ended IEEPA tariff collection on February 24, 2026, replacing them with temporary Section 122 tariffs at a rate of 10 percent, which are applied in addition to existing Most Favored Nation (MFN) rates.
Why the US and the WTO should part ways - CEPR cepr.org 2 facts
claimThe United States currently violates almost all of its tariff bindings and the fundamental Most Favoured Nation (MFN) provision of the World Trade Organization.
claimBilateral trade deals pursued by the second Trump administration, such as those with the United Kingdom and China, violate the most-favoured nation (MFN) non-discrimination clause found in Article I of the GATT because these deals are not applied to all WTO members.