Relations (1)

cross_type 3.46 — strongly supporting 6 facts

The U.S. and natural gas are linked through their central role in the American energy sector, where natural gas has significantly replaced coal and nuclear power for electricity generation {fact:2, fact:3, fact:5, fact:7}. Furthermore, the U.S. relies on natural gas for hydrogen production [1] and faces economic considerations regarding its price volatility and market competition {fact:4, fact:6, fact:10}.

Facts (6)

Sources
Clean Energy Solutions Must Include Nuclear | ClearPath clearpath.org ClearPath 2 facts
claimThe loss of existing nuclear power plants in the United States has significant potential emissions impacts, particularly because natural gas—which has higher emissions than nuclear power—has largely replaced the retired nuclear capacity.
claimThe United States power sector faces risks from relying heavily on natural gas due to historical price volatility, despite the recent abundance and low cost of shale gas resources.
The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment ... nationalacademies.org National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2 facts
measurementThe U.S. Energy Information Administration's Annual Energy Outlook 2014 'Reference Case' projects that coal, natural gas, and petroleum will supply 68 percent of total U.S. electricity generation in 2040, a figure virtually identical to the 2012 usage levels.
claimIn the United States, electricity generated from renewable sources generally costs more than electricity generated from fossil fuels, particularly natural gas.
Sustainable Energy Transition for Renewable and Low Carbon Grid ... frontiersin.org Frontiers 1 fact
referencePlumer (2021) reported on the competition between natural gas and renewable energy sources as coal usage declines in the United States.
Transatlantic Trade, the Trump Disruption and the World ... - ECPS populismstudies.org Kent Jones · European Center for Populism Studies 1 fact
claimEuropean Union commitments regarding natural gas and computer chip purchases, as well as $600 billion of foreign investment in the United States, appear not to be legally enforceable because they involve private, contingent commercial transactions and investment.