Knowledge Tree
Relations (1)
cross_type 2.58 — strongly supporting 5 facts
The New York Times has extensively covered and editorialized on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, specifically analyzing its diplomatic significance [1], the political opposition it faced [2], [3], and the strategic implications for the Iranian government [4], [5].
Facts (5)
Sources
Editorials Supporting an Iran Nuclear Deal, January - September 2015 armscontrol.org 5 facts
quoteThe New York Times stated that the Iran nuclear deal is potentially one of the most consequential accords in recent diplomatic history, with the ability to keep Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and to reshape Middle East politics.
perspectiveThe New York Times editorial board criticized some Republicans for using exaggerations and half-truths to oppose President Barack Obama's nuclear deal with Iran.
perspectiveThe New York Times editorial board argued on April 7, 2015, that the new demands made by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government regarding the Iran nuclear deal were unrealistic and would lead to no deal at all.
claimThe New York Times editorial board stated on June 24, 2015, that the April framework accord provided a solid basis for a credible final deal with Iran.
perspectiveThe New York Times editorial board asserted on June 24, 2015, that Ayatollah Khamenei must decide whether he and his government can live with the economic and political consequences if he sabotages the Iran nuclear deal.