Knowledge Tree
Relations (1)
cross_type 3.70 — strongly supporting 12 facts
The Washington Institute for Near East Policy frequently analyzes Iran's nuclear program, military capabilities, and foreign policy, as evidenced by their published reports [1], [2], [3], and [4]. Furthermore, the institute actively develops policy recommendations regarding Iran's nuclear infrastructure, sanctions, and ballistic missile development [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], and [12].
Facts (12)
Sources
A “Good Deal” with Iran? Requirements for Preventing a Future ... washingtoninstitute.org 8 facts
perspectiveThe Washington Institute advises against the broad removal of sanctions on the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) unless there is proven structural dismantlement of Iran's nuclear and missile infrastructure.
perspectiveThe Washington Institute proposes that any new nuclear agreement with Iran should utilize a graduated, reversible sanctions architecture that conditions economic relief on continuous, verifiable compliance.
perspectiveThe Washington Institute argues that nuclear facilities constructed a certain distance underground are intrinsically incompatible with a breakout-proof framework and must be permanently disabled and sealed.
referenceThe Washington Institute for Near East Policy published PolicyWatch 4169, titled 'A “Good Deal” with Iran? Requirements for Preventing a Future Nuclear Breakout,' which analyzes the requirements for preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
perspectiveThe Washington Institute recommends that any future nuclear agreement with Iran must prohibit warhead-related experiments, hydrodynamic simulations, and nuclear weapons computational modeling, as well as the acquisition of items supporting militarization.
perspectiveThe Washington Institute advocates for a verification regime for Iran's future nuclear activities that exceeds traditional arms-control monitoring and approaches counterproliferation transparency standards.
perspectiveThe Washington Institute argues that a comprehensive ban on Iranian intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) development is necessary due to the threat such capabilities pose to U.S. and European homeland security.
perspectiveThe Washington Institute recommends that Iran's access to the Western financial system, including the SWIFT network, should be limited and reversible, and that energy export ceilings should be established with conditional, incremental expansion.
War by Proxy: Iran's Growing Footprint in the Middle East - CSIS csis.org 2 facts
referenceHanin Ghaddar and Phillip Smyth authored 'Rolling Back Iran’s Foreign Legion' for The Washington Institute for Near East Policy on February 6, 2018.
referenceMichael Knights published 'Iran’s Foreign Legion: The Role of Iraqi Shiite Militias in Syria' through The Washington Institute for Near East Policy on June 27, 2013.
From Arab Spring to regional reset: Saudi-Iranian rivalry ... - Frontiers frontiersin.org 1 fact
referenceM. Knights authored the policy analysis 'Rising to Iran's challenge: GCC Military Capability and US Security Co-operation,' published by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy in Washington, DC in 2013.
Reforming Iran's Energy Policy: Strategies for Sustainability ... jpia.princeton.edu 1 fact
claimPatrick Clawson argues that economic mismanagement makes Iran vulnerable to a specific type of U.S. pressure, as detailed in his 2019 analysis for The Washington Institute for Near East Policy.