Knowledge Tree
Relations (1)
cross_type 2.32 — strongly supporting 4 facts
The New York Times has extensively covered and editorialized on Iran's nuclear program, specifically analyzing the implications of international nuclear deals and the role of the United States Congress in these negotiations as detailed in [1], [2], [3], and [4].
Facts (4)
Sources
Editorials Supporting an Iran Nuclear Deal, January - September 2015 armscontrol.org 4 facts
perspectiveThe New York Times editorial board argued on February 25, 2015, that any nuclear agreement with Iran must be evaluated based on the complete package rather than individual provisions, noting that the risk of walking away from negotiations could allow Iran to continue nuclear activities without restrictions.
perspectiveThe New York Times editorial board stated on April 14, 2015, that Congress muscled its way into President Obama's negotiations with Iran, creating dangerous uncertainties for an agreement that offers the best chance of restraining Iran's nuclear program.
perspectiveThe New York Times editorial board argued on March 7, 2015, that the United States Congress should support a verifiable nuclear deal with Iran rather than engaging in political games that could isolate the United States, dismantle the sanctions regime, and leave Iran's nuclear program unrestricted.
quoteThe New York Times stated that the final nuclear deal with Iran announced by the United States and other major world powers puts strong, verifiable limits on Iran’s ability to develop a nuclear weapon for at least 10 to 15 years.