Relations (1)
related 2.00 — strongly supporting 3 facts
The Gettier problem is fundamentally defined by its challenge to the traditional tripartite account of knowledge, which requires a belief to be both justified and true [1]. The concept of truth is central to this analysis, as Gettier cases show that justified true beliefs can fail to be knowledge due to luck [1], and subsequent philosophical attempts to resolve the problem, such as Zagzebski's, focus on the necessary connection between warrant and truth [2] or the exclusion of 'gettiered' states from definitions of a priori knowledge [3].
Facts (3)
Sources
Epistemology | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy iep.utm.edu 1 fact
claimThe Gettier problem demonstrates that it is possible for a belief to be both justified and true, yet still fail to constitute knowledge because the truth of the belief relies on luck.
Virtue Epistemology | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy iep.utm.edu 1 fact
claimLinda Zagzebski claims that her analysis of knowledge is immune to Gettier counterexamples because of the tight connection between the warrant and truth conditions for knowledge.
Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu 1 fact
claimA priori knowledge consists of beliefs that are true, justified a priori, and not 'gettiered'.