Knowledge Tree
Supreme Court
Also known as: Supreme Court of the United States
Facts (18)
Sources
Media Coverage - News Center - Baruch College newscenter.baruch.cuny.edu 6 facts
claimMarc Edelman provided commentary for Southern California Public Radio 89.3-KPCC regarding the Supreme Court ruling against the NCAA on June 21, 2021.
claimMarc Edelman authored an article for Forbes titled 'What Happens Now That the Supreme Court has Decided Alston V. NCAA?' on June 22, 2021.
claimMichael Bobelian wrote a review for The Washington Post's Book World regarding a biography of a Supreme Court civil rights figure on July 16, 2021.
claimMarc Edelman wrote for Forbes arguing that NCAA deregulation is inevitable following a Supreme Court loss on July 18, 2021.
claimMarc Edelman authored an article for MLive titled 'Supreme Court Ruling on NCAA Opens Door for College Athletes to get Paid' on June 21, 2021.
accountS. David Wu was cited by ABC News regarding Supreme Court cases concerning race-conscious college admissions on October 30, 2022.
USTR initiates Section 301 investigations of 60 US trade partners ... jdsupra.com Mar 17, 2026 3 facts
claimThe Trump administration was required to rescind IEEPA tariffs on February 24, 2026, after the Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the president authority to impose tariffs.
accountIn an Agreement Regarding Trade (ART) signed before the Supreme Court ended the IEEPA tariff program, Indonesia committed to adopt and implement a prohibition on the importation of goods mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part by forced or compulsory labor within two years of the agreement's entry into force.
claimAmbassador Greer issued a statement regarding the Supreme Court's decision on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) on February 20, 2026.
Tracking Trump's Trade Deals | Council on Foreign Relations cfr.org Mar 17, 2026 3 facts
claimThe Supreme Court's invalidation of IEEPA tariffs resulted in the retraction of duties from seven executive orders: 14193 (Canada-Fentanyl), 14194 (Mexico-Fentanyl), 14195 (China-Fentanyl), 14245 (Venezuelan Oil), 14257 (Reciprocal Tariff), 14323 (Brazil), and 14329 (India-Russian Oil Imports).
procedureFollowing the Supreme Court ruling, U.S. Customs and Border Protection issued a bulletin on February 22, 2026, to end the collection of all IEEPA-based tariffs effective at 12:00 a.m. eastern time on February 24, 2026.
claimThe Agreement Between the United States and the Republic of Ecuador on Reciprocal Trade is the first signed trade agreement following a Supreme Court ruling that struck down the use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs.
How the “Scientific Consensus” on Global Warming Affects ... heritage.org Oct 26, 2010 2 facts
claimIn a 2007 Supreme Court case, the court decided that carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases are pollutants that can be regulated under the Clean Air Act.
claimThe Supreme Court ordered the EPA administrator to determine if greenhouse gas emissions were dangerous to human health and the environment and whether the scientific consensus on the effects of greenhouse gases was settled.
USTR Initiates New Section 301 Trade Investigations Into 60 Partners steptoe.com Mar 17, 2026 1 fact
claimFollowing the Supreme Court's February 20, 2026 ruling against IEEPA-based tariffs, President Trump announced plans to use other trade authorities, including Section 301 investigations and Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, to reinstate tariffs on most imports.
Policy Paper: Decoding the United States on Tariffs and Trade freiheit.org Dec 16, 2025 1 fact
claimSome experts contend that IEEPA (International Emergency Economic Powers Act) tariffs are clearly illegal and will be ruled so by the Supreme Court, though they expect the administration to draw out legal proceedings and pivot to alternative laws like section 232 and 301 tariffs.
USTR Launches Broad Section 301 Investigations Into Excess ... dwt.com 2 days ago 1 fact
claimThe 2017 Section 301 investigation into China faced an unsuccessful legal challenge regarding the modifications that added the final two tranches of tariffs, a case which is currently under consideration for review by the Supreme Court.
USTR Initiates Section 301 Investigations into Failures to Enforce a ... kslaw.com Mar 13, 2026 1 fact
claimThe Section 301 investigations initiated on March 12, 2026, are expected to provide a statutory basis for the U.S. Administration to reimpose tariffs, potentially allowing the Administration to reestablish the scope and level of tariffs that existed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA) prior to a Supreme Court decision striking them down.