Knowledge Tree
moral testimony
Facts (11)
Sources
Epistemological Problems of Testimony plato.stanford.edu Apr 1, 2021 11 facts
claimIn the article 'Against Epistemic Pessimism about Moral Testimony', the author challenges pessimistic views regarding the epistemic value of moral testimony.
claimPhilip Nickel's 2001 article 'Moral Testimony and Its Authority' examines the authority of moral testimony.
claimPaddy Jane McShane discussed the non-remedial value of dependence on moral testimony in a 2018 article in Philosophical Studies.
claimDaniel Groll and Jason Decker argued in 2014 that moral testimony should be treated similarly to other forms of testimony.
claimPaulina Sliwa defends the role of moral testimony in her 2012 paper published in Philosophical Studies.
referenceRoger Crisp published the paper 'Moral Testimony Pessimism: A Defence' in the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume in 2014.
claimIn the 2018 article 'Moral Testimony and Moral Understanding', the author argues about the relationship between moral testimony and moral understanding.
referenceRobert Hopkins authored the article "What Is Wrong With Moral Testimony?," published in the 2007 issue of "Philosophy and Phenomenological Research."
referenceAlison Hills authored the article "Moral Testimony," published in the 2013 issue of "Philosophy Compass."
referenceEric Wiland authored the essay 'Moral Testimony: Going on the Offensive,' published in the 2017 volume 'Oxford Studies in Metaethics 12,' edited by Russ Shafer-Landau.
referenceAlison Hills authored the article "Moral Testimony and Moral Epistemology," published in the 2009 issue of "Ethics."