concept

game theory

Also known as: game theoretic approach, GT

Facts (24)

Sources
Strategic analysis of cyber conflicts: A game-theoretic modelling of ... securityanddefence.pl Security and Defence Quarterly May 31, 2025 15 facts
claimIn game-theoretic models of cyber conflict, players represent states or state-sponsored actors engaging in cyber operations as the primary decision-making entities.
claimPayoffs in game-theoretic frameworks for cyber conflict are calculated based on multiple factors, including strategic gains, economic impacts, reputational effects, and potential retaliation costs.
claimThe authors' analysis of six global case studies using game theory modelling reveals significant patterns in cyber conflict dynamics, demonstrating both universal strategic behaviors and region-specific variations.
claimAlpcan and Başar (2010) approach network security problems from game theory and decision theory perspectives, showing how theoretical models can be applied to practical security problems.
formulaA Nash Equilibrium represents a stable state in a game-theoretic model where no actor can unilaterally improve their position by changing their strategy, providing insights into the likely outcomes of cyber conflicts.
referenceThe study 'Strategic analysis of cyber conflicts: A game-theoretic modelling of global cyber' employs game theory to analyze six significant cyber crises that occurred during the 2000s across North America, South America, Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa.
referenceLiang and Xiao (2013) provide a comprehensive literature review on the application of game theory to modeling attack-defense dynamics in cyberspace.
claimStrategies in game-theoretic models of cyber conflict encompass both offensive actions, such as cyberattacks and information operations, and defensive measures employed to protect state interests.
claimGame theory provides a mathematical framework for modelling strategic decision-making processes and interactions among actors in the cyber domain, as demonstrated by analyses of cyber conflict cases from the 2000s.
claimSchelling (1960) established that game theory has a proven track record in modeling strategic interactions within the field of international relations.
formulaThe fundamental assumption of game theory is that actors make rational choices to maximise their utility or payoff.
claimThe application of game theory to cyber conflicts assumes rational actor behavior, which may not fully account for ideological, cultural, or personality-driven decisions in cyber operations.
referenceGame theory is a branch of mathematics and economics that offers a structured approach to modelling strategic interactions between rational decision-makers.
formulaA game in the study's theoretical framework consists of three components: players (states involved in cyber conflicts), strategies (the set of possible actions available to each player), and payoffs (the outcomes or utilities associated with each combination of strategies).
claimAlpcan and Başar (2010) use the Stackelberg game model to determine optimal defense strategies, demonstrating the potential of game theory in cybersecurity.
Comprehensive framework for smart residential demand side ... nature.com Nature Mar 22, 2025 2 facts
claimRecent research suggests that prominent methods for demand-side management include linear programming, nonlinear programming, dynamic programming, stochastic programming, robust optimization, fuzzy logic, metaheuristic or evolutionary optimization, artificial neural networks, and game theory.
claimProminent methods suggested in recent research for demand-side management include linear programming, nonlinear programming, dynamic programming, stochastic programming, robust optimization, fuzzy logic, metaheuristic or evolutionary optimization, artificial neural networks, and game theory.
Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Feb 26, 2001 1 fact
claimCredit economy models utilize game and decision theory to analyze scientists as rational credit seekers and evaluate the epistemic consequences of the credit incentives they face.
Geopolitics of the energy transition: between global challenges and ... geoprogress-edition.eu Simona Epasto · Geoprogress Edition Oct 26, 2025 1 fact
perspectiveThe qualitative cross-impact technique is more flexible than quantitative models like game theory for capturing the complexity of strategic decisions and their long-term consequences.
A comprehensive overview on demand side energy management ... link.springer.com Springer Mar 13, 2023 1 fact
referenceNoor S, Guo M, van Dam KH, Shah N, and Wang X published the paper 'Energy demand side management with supply constraints: game theoretic approach' in Energy Procedia, volume 145, pages 368–373, in 2018.
Social Epistemology - Open Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science oecs.mit.edu MIT Press Jul 24, 2024 1 fact
referenceMutual and common knowledge are fundamental concepts in game theory and epistemic logic, as described by Fagin et al. (1996), representing collective knowledge that is fundamentally individualistic.
Demand side management using optimization strategies for efficient ... journals.plos.org PLOS ONE Mar 21, 2024 1 fact
referenceSharma R. and Gopal M. proposed synergizing reinforcement learning and game theory as a new direction for control systems in a 2010 paper in Applied Soft Computing.
Finance (FINN) - catalog.uark.edu - University of Arkansas catalog.uark.edu University of Arkansas 1 fact
referenceThe University of Arkansas FINN 41203 Valuing New Ventures course covers valuation methods for entrepreneurial, early-stage, and R&D finance, including term sheets, valuing full and partial stakes, preferred and participating convertible preferred stock, options, later-round investments, complex structures, R&D finance, Monte Carlo simulation, real options, binomial trees, and game theory.
Evolutionary psychology - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org Wikipedia 1 fact
referenceEdward H. Hagen and Peter Hammerstein published 'Game theory and human evolution: A critique of some recent interpretations of experimental games' in 2006.