Knowledge Tree
Consciousness and Cognitive Sciences
Facts (11)
Sources
Consciousness and Cognitive Sciences journal-psychoanalysis.eu 11 facts
quoteThe authors of 'Consciousness and Cognitive Sciences' describe experience as "not an explanatory posit, but an explanandum in its own right, and so it is not a candidate for reductive elimination."
claimThe author of 'Consciousness and Cognitive Sciences' asserts that the development of new cerebral imaging techniques has a paradoxical effect on how the psychophenomenological level is considered in research.
perspectiveThe authors of 'Consciousness and Cognitive Sciences' argue that the philosophy of mind exhibits a compulsive, neurotic pattern of behavior by repeatedly attempting to resolve theoretical problems with abstract models that fail to account for consciousness.
perspectiveThe authors of 'Consciousness and Cognitive Sciences' argue that explaining conscious experience requires a non-reductive explanation, a position they believe is heavier than most people, including David Chalmers, are willing to concede.
perspectiveThe author of 'Consciousness and Cognitive Sciences' argues that an alternative to adding new theoretical principles to explain consciousness is to change the entire framework within which the issue is viewed.
perspectiveThe book 'Consciousness and Cognitive Sciences' serves as an argument against psycho-neural identity theory, asserting that phenomenology is not merely a 'garb' but permeates the intrinsic nature of the phenomena being studied.
quoteThe authors of 'Consciousness and Cognitive Sciences' state: "[t]he moral of all this is that you can’t explain conscious experience on the cheap."
perspectiveThe author of 'Consciousness and Cognitive Sciences' disagrees with John Searle's inability to propose a solution to the epistemological issues involved in the study of consciousness, despite agreeing with Searle's defense of the irreducibility of consciousness.
perspectiveThe author of the article 'Consciousness and Cognitive Sciences' argues that Daniel Dennett incorrectly conflates Impressionism, Introspectionism, and Phenomenology, and mistakenly assumes that universal agreement is necessary to validate a research program.
claimThe authors of 'Consciousness and Cognitive Sciences' identify the work of P. Churchland & Sejnowski (1992) and F. Crick & Ch. Koch (1990) as representing the 'neuroreductionism' or 'eliminativism' position within naturalistic approaches to cognitive science.
claimThe authors of 'Consciousness and Cognitive Sciences' categorize naturalistic approaches to cognitive science into a spectrum, explicitly excluding traditional dualistic stances (such as those held by J. C. Eccles) and theories proposed by quantum mechanics proponents.