In typical skeptical arguments, we invariably find that we are more certain of the of the knowledge seemingly denied us than we are of some of the premises. Thus it is not reasonable to adopt the skeptical conclusion that we do not have that knowledge. The rational stance is instead to deny one or more of the premises.

Authors

• Person: Not available Organization: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  Naturalized Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Sources

• Naturalized Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy via serper

Referenced by nodes (2)

• knowledge concept
• skeptical arguments concept