In the doctrinal paradox example provided by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, a court of three judges evaluates liability based on two premises (obligation and action) where liability is true if and only if both premises are true; however, when using majority rule for each proposition, the group can arrive at a logically inconsistent conclusion where the premises are accepted but the conclusion is rejected.

Authors

• Person: Not available Organization: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Sources

• Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy via serper

Referenced by nodes (1)

• liability concept