claim
Critics of the Assurance View object that it is unclear how non-evidential assurances can justify a belief, specifically questioning whether a listener who is the intended recipient of an assurance is epistemically better off than an eavesdropper who hears the same testimony but was not the intended recipient.
Authors
Sources
- Epistemological Problems of Testimony plato.stanford.edu via serper
Referenced by nodes (2)
- testimonial justification concept
- Assurance View concept