Lackey (2010) proposes a 'justificationist' position on peer disagreement, arguing that rationality in such cases is determined by what one's total evidence supports after incorporating the evidence acquired from the disagreement itself.

Authors

• Person: Not available Organization: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Sources

• Social Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy via serper

Referenced by nodes (1)

• peer disagreement concept