claim
Opponents of Global Reductionism argue that acquiring non-testimonial reasons to justify the general reliability of testimony leads to either a vicious circle or an insurmountable regress, as confirming the reliability of one speaker often requires relying on the testimony of others.
Authors
Sources
- Epistemological Problems of Testimony plato.stanford.edu via serper
Referenced by nodes (2)
- testimony concept
- global reductionism concept