claim
In Datadog's chain-of-thought prompts and rubrics, referring to the context as 'expert advice' and the answer as a 'candidate answer' creates an asymmetry that frames the context as the definitive source of truth.
Authors
Sources
- Detecting hallucinations with LLM-as-a-judge: Prompt ... - Datadog www.datadoghq.com via serper
Referenced by nodes (3)
- chain-of-thought concept
- Datadog entity
- context concept