claim
The 'uber-mind' argument posits that if two distinct points of view were combined into a single 'uber-mind,' that mind would have to possess both sets of experiences to the exclusion of all others, which is contradictory; this argument is used to suggest that constitutive micropsychism is incoherent.
Authors
Sources
- Panpsychism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu via serper
Referenced by nodes (1)
- constitutive micropsychism concept