In the case of McCollum v. D’Arcy (1994), the court rejected the requirement for independent corroborating evidence to apply the discovery rule, but ruled that the plaintiff bears the burden of validating the phenomenon of memory repression and the admissibility of evidence derived from it.

Authors

• Person: Thomas A. Pavlinic Organization: False Memory Syndrome Foundation
  State of New Hampshire Supreme Court, Hungerford v. Morahan

Sources

• State of New Hampshire Supreme Court, Hungerford v. Morahan www.fmsfonline.org Thomas A. Pavlinic · False Memory Syndrome Foundation via serper

Referenced by nodes (1)

• delayed discovery rule concept