Knowledge Tree
Relations (1)
cross_type 0.50 — strongly supporting 5 facts
David Chalmers is related to science because he critiques its current ontological framework regarding consciousness [1], defines the 'hard problem' as a unique challenge for scientific explanation [2], and advocates for applying rigorous conceptual analysis and epistemological standards to scientific inquiry {fact:2, fact:4}.
Facts (5)
Sources
Moving Forward on the Problem of Consciousness - David Chalmers consc.net 2 facts
claimDavid Chalmers observes that in science, instantiations of structural properties are generally explicable through basic components and their relations.
claimDavid Chalmers asserts that an adequate epistemology is necessary to develop a detailed theory of consciousness, similar to other areas of science.
The Problem of Hard and Easy Problems cambridge.org 1 fact
claimDavid Chalmers has championed the use of conceptual analysis for the past three decades to identify criteria for distinguishing between 'easy' and 'hard' problems in science.
Panpsychism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Fall 2015 Edition) plato.stanford.edu 1 fact
claimDavid Chalmers claims that the explanation of consciousness presents a uniquely difficult problem for science.
The Hard Problem of Consciousness | Springer Nature Link link.springer.com 1 fact
perspectiveDavid Chalmers argues that because physicalism cannot explain why neurophysical processes are correlated with qualitative experience, solving the 'hard problem of consciousness' requires radical changes in the ontological framework upon which modern science is based.