Knowledge Tree
Relations (1)
cross_type 11.00 — strongly supporting 11 facts
David Chalmers relates consciousness to physics by proposing that consciousness provides the intrinsic properties that correspond to the extrinsic properties described by physics {fact:1, fact:5, fact:11}. He further explores this connection by suggesting that psychophysical laws might function similarly to fundamental laws in physics {fact:2, fact:6} and by analyzing how physics describes the relational structure of the universe {fact:3, fact:7, fact:9}.
Facts (11)
Sources
Moving Forward on the Problem of Consciousness - David Chalmers consc.net 5 facts
claimCritics Mills and Price argue that David Chalmers' invocation of fundamental laws to bridge physics and consciousness fails to solve the hard problem, instead providing only a sophisticated set of correlations.
perspectiveDavid Chalmers favors a Russellian interpretation of the informational picture of consciousness, where experience forms the intrinsic or realizing aspect of informational states that are fundamental to physics but characterized by physics only extrinsically.
perspectiveDavid Chalmers criticizes physics-based proposals for consciousness only when they are offered as reductive explanations, such as the claim that quantum mechanics can explain consciousness where neurons cannot.
perspectiveDavid Chalmers proposes that psychophysical explanations of consciousness will eventually be reduced to a simple core taken as primitive, similar to how physics treats fundamental laws.
quoteDavid Chalmers characterizes the relationship between physics and experience as: "Physics is information from the outside; experience is information from the inside."
The Hard Problem of Consciousness | Springer Nature Link link.springer.com 3 facts
claimDavid Chalmers assumes that consciousness is a natural phenomenon that follows universal principles or laws, even if it does not follow the same causal laws known from physics.
claimDavid Chalmers argues that physics emerges from the relations between entities, while consciousness emerges from their intrinsic nature, a view he claims is compatible with the causal closure of the microphysical and existing physical laws. He asserts that (proto)phenomenal properties serve as the ultimate categorical basis of all physical causation.
claimDavid Chalmers acknowledges that the existence of relational structure and disposition in physics suggests the existence of intrinsic relata or quiddities, though he does not view this as a logical necessity.
Panpsychism - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org 2 facts
perspectiveDavid Chalmers argues that extrinsic properties of physics must have corresponding intrinsic properties because otherwise the universe would be "a giant causal flux" with nothing for "causation to relate," which he considers a logical impossibility.
claimDavid Chalmers views consciousness as a candidate for the intrinsic properties that correspond to the extrinsic properties of physics.
David Chalmers Thinks the Hard Problem Is Really Hard scientificamerican.com 1 fact
claimDavid Chalmers suggests that a final theory of consciousness might not provide an intuitive 'Aha!' reaction, similar to how explanations of chemistry in terms of physics or biology in terms of chemistry do.