Knowledge Tree
Relations (1)
cross_type 5.39 — strongly supporting 41 facts
Philip Goff is a prominent contemporary philosopher and advocate for panpsychism, having authored numerous academic articles and books on the subject, such as 'Galileo’s Error' [1] and the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on the topic {fact:4, fact:6}. He actively defends panpsychism as a superior alternative to physicalism and dualism {fact:28, fact:36} and provides philosophical arguments for its validity {fact:8, fact:14, fact:39}.
Facts (41)
Sources
Panpsychism - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org 8 facts
perspectivePhilip Goff argues that the counterintuitive nature of panpsychism is not a valid objection, noting that the theories of Albert Einstein and Charles Darwin are also counterintuitive.
perspectivePhilip Goff argues that panpsychism avoids the disunity of dualism, where mind and matter are ontologically separate, and avoids dualism's problems in explaining how mind and matter interact.
perspectiveDavid Chalmers and Philip Goff describe panpsychism as an alternative to both materialism and dualism.
perspectiveDavid Papineau expressed sympathy toward panpsychism in a 2017 debate, though he noted his reasons for doing so differ from those of Philip Goff.
perspectivePhilip Goff believes that neutral monism can reasonably be regarded as a form of panpsychism in so far as it is a dual aspect view.
perspectivePhilip Goff calls panpsychism an alternative to both physicalism and substance dualism.
perspectivePhilip Goff, a philosopher, advocates for panpsychism as a perspective on consciousness.
claimRecent proponents of panpsychism include David Ray Griffin, David Skrbina, Gregg Rosenberg, Timothy Sprigge, Philip Goff, and William Seager.
Critique of Panpsychism: Philosophical Coherence and Scientific ... thequran.love 8 facts
perspectivePhilip Goff and other proponents of panpsychism advocate for a 'post-Galilean' science that incorporates first-person data as fundamental, rather than restricting science solely to third-person data.
perspectivePhilip Goff asserts that dismissing panpsychism as 'crazy' without providing a substantive argument may appear irrational in hindsight.
referencePhilip Goff's 2019 book 'Galileo’s Error: Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness' provides a popular exposition of panpsychism, notes an increasing openness to the theory, and addresses the 'crazy' objection.
perspectiveGalen Strawson and Philip Goff argue that the seeming strangeness of panpsychism is not a decisive strike against it, noting that science has previously accepted counterintuitive ideas like relativity and quantum mechanics.
quotePhilip Goff predicts: "In twenty years’ time, the idea that panpsychism can be quickly dismissed as ‘crazy’ will seem, well, crazy."
perspectivePhilip Goff argues that panpsychism should be accepted despite its strangeness because it offers the best explanation for human and animal consciousness and serves as the most parsimonious theory regarding the intrinsic nature of matter.
claimPhilip Goff asserts that the combination problem is the central challenge for panpsychists and that no existing account of how micro-experiences combine is fully satisfactory.
claimGalen Strawson and Philip Goff are prominent contemporary advocates of panpsychism who view the theory as the only viable way to take consciousness seriously without abandoning a monistic worldview.
Panpsychism: Conscious Rocks and Socks - Free Thinking Ministries freethinkingministries.com 7 facts
claimPhilip Goff argues that panpsychism should be considered despite its counter-intuitive nature, drawing parallels to the initial reception of the theory of relativity, quantum mechanics, and the theory of evolution.
claimGalen Strawson is a prominent advocate for the panpsychist views held by Philip Goff.
claimDr. Tim Stratton defines Philip Goff's panpsychism as the theory that consciousness is a fundamental and ubiquitous feature of the material world, implying that material objects are composed of more fundamental, conscious components.
claimPhilip Goff prefers panpsychism because he argues it does not violate Ockham's Razor.
claimPhilip Goff suggests that panpsychism provides a potential framework for libertarian free will within a naturalistic worldview.
claimDr. Tim Stratton suggests that Philip Goff may prefer substance dualism or panpsychism over materialism because of the philosophical challenge known as 'the hard problem' of consciousness.
perspectiveThe author asserts that Philip Goff prefers substance dualism over materialism, but prefers panpsychism over substance dualism because he views materialism as incoherent and panpsychism as simpler than dualism.
Panpsychism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy plato.stanford.edu 7 facts
referenceThe chapter "Orthodox Property Dualism + Linguistic Theory of Vagueness = Panpsychism" by Philip Goff was published in the book "Consciousness Inside and Out: Phenomenology, Neuroscience, and the Nature of Experience", edited by Richard Brown, by Springer in Dordrecht in 2013, pages 75–91.
claimThe 'Intrinsic Nature Argument' for panpsychism has historical roots in the works of Leibniz, Schopenhauer, Bertrand Russell (1927), and Alfred North Whitehead (1933 [1967]), and is supported by contemporary philosophers including T.L.S. Sprigge (1999), Galen Strawson (2003), and Philip Goff (2017).
referenceThe article "Why Panpsychism Doesn’t Help Us Explain Consciousness" by Philip Goff was published in Dialectica in 2009, volume 63, issue 3, pages 289–311.
perspectivePhilip Goff (2006, 2017) argues that panpsychists may be unable to provide a wholly intelligible explanation for how macro-level consciousness emerges from micro-level consciousness, which challenges Galen Strawson's claim that panpsychism avoids radical emergence.
claimPhilip Goff has argued that consciousness is not vague, and this leads to a sorites-style argument in favor of panpsychism.
perspectivePhilip Goff argues that the most simple, elegant, and parsimonious hypothesis regarding the intrinsic nature of matter is panpsychism, which posits that matter outside of brains is continuous with brain matter in possessing a consciousness-involving nature.
claimPhilip Goff wrote the July 2017 version of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Panpsychism, which was almost entirely new.
Panpsychism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Fall 2025 Edition) plato.stanford.edu 5 facts
claimPhilip Goff's sorites-style argument for panpsychism posits that if consciousness lacks borderline cases, the emergence of consciousness would require an arbitrary, precise micro-level change in particle arrangement.
claimDavid Chalmers and Philip Goff identify the need to account for mental causation within the causal closure of the physical—the thesis that every physical event has a sufficient physical cause—as a motivation for panpsychism.
claimResponses to Philip Goff's simplicity argument for panpsychism have been provided by Taylor (2019) and Dainton (forthcoming).
claimThe intrinsic nature argument for panpsychism is defended by philosophers including Michael Lockwood Sprigge (1999), Galen Strawson (2003), and Philip Goff (2017).
claimPhilip Goff is the primary author of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Panpsychism starting from the July 2017 version, with Section 1 developed from a previous version by William Seager and Sean Allen-Hermanson.
Hard problem of consciousness - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org 3 facts
referencePhilip Goff, William Seager, and Sean Allen-Hermanson authored the entry 'Panpsychism' for the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta in 2017.
referencePhilip Goff authored the article 'The Case for Panpsychism', published in Philosophy Now in 2017.
claimThomas Nagel, Galen Strawson, Philip Goff, and David Chalmers have revived interest in panpsychism and neutral monism in recent decades.
Philp Goff on Dualism About Consciousness - YouTube youtube.com 2 facts
claimRobinson and Philip Goff discuss the major philosophical perspectives on consciousness, specifically physicalism, dualism, and panpsychism, in the YouTube video titled 'Philp Goff on Dualism About Consciousness'.
claimPhysicalism, dualism, and panpsychism are identified as the major camps in the debate over consciousness by Robinson and Philip Goff.
Philosophical perspectives on consciousness | Humans - Vocal Media vocal.media 1 fact
claimAlfred North Whitehead and Philip Goff argue that panpsychism provides a more coherent explanation for the emergence of consciousness than physicalism.